Because of the lack of tools available to assess problem-solving skills, teachers often revert to more traditional instructional approaches (e.g. lecture-based, memorization) that fail to prepare learners for the complexity of dynamic work environments. To overcome this challenge, technology solutions are needed that accurately and efficiently assess complex problem-solving skills such as causal reasoning. Moreover, these tools must be valid and reliable so instructors can accurately assess student learning. This emergent report details the design and development of Incremental Thesaurus for Assessing Causal Maps. As will be described, the software offers three unique features: (a) analysis of causal map with little or no manipulation of the original file; (b) a growing repository of terms that supports efficient assessment and (c) ability to codify the level of concept complexity using the structure–behavior–function framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bastien, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009) Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
Baur, M., & Benkert, M. (2005). Network comparison. In U. Brandes & T. Erlebach (Eds.), Network analysis (pp. 318–340). Berlin: Springer.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.
Dickinson, P. J., Bunke, H., Dadej, A., & Kraetzl, M. (2003). On graphs with unique node labels. In E. Hancock & M. Vento (Eds.), Graph based representations in pattern recognition (pp. 13–23). Berlin: Springer.
Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.
Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182.
Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2013). Validation study of a method for assessing complex ill-structured problem solving by using causal representations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 443–463.
Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In P. Feltovich, K. Fork, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 125–146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giabbanelli, P. J., & Baniukiewicz, M. (2018). Navigating complex systems for policymaking using simple software tools. In V. Mago, P. J. Giabbanelli, & E. Papageorgiou (Eds.), Advanced data analytics in health. New York, NY: Springer.
Hmelo-Silver, C. (2013). Creating a learning space in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1334.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., & Day, R. S. (2002). “It’s harder than we thought it would be”: A comparative case study of expert–novice experimentation strategies. Science Education, 86(2), 219–243.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Pfeffer, M. G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28(1), 127–138.
Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 529–552.
Hung, W. (2016). All PBL starts here: The problem. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2), 2.
Ifenthaler, D., & Eseryel, D. (2013). Facilitating complex learning by mobile augmented reality learning environments. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Reshaping learning (pp. 415–438). Berlin: Springer.
Ifenthaler, D., & Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2014). Model-based tools for knowledge assessment. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 289–301). New York, NY: Springer.
Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6(3), 41–49.
Jeong, A., & Lee, W. J. (2012). Developing causal understanding with causal maps: The impact of total links, temporal flow, and lateral position of outcome nodes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(2), 325–340.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2006). Learning to troubleshoot: A new theory-based design architecture. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 77–114.
Kolodner, J. (1991). Improving human decision making through case-based decision aiding. AI Magazine, 12(2), 52–68.
Kolodner, J., Hmelo-Silver, C., & Narayanan, N. H. (1996). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. In Proceedings of the 1996 international conference on learning sciences (pp. 188–195). Evanston, Illinois: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Moon, B., Hoffman, R. R., Novak, J., & Canas, A. (2011). Applied concept mapping. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Savin-Baden, M. (2004). Understanding the impact of assessment on students in problem-based learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(2), 221–233.
Senocak, E. (2009). Development of an instrument for assessing undergraduate science students’ perceptions: The problem-based learning environment inventory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 560–569.
Tamim, S., & Grant, M. (2013). Definitions and uses: Case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1323.
About this article
Cite this article
Giabbanelli, P.J., Tawfik, A.A. Overcoming the PBL Assessment Challenge: Design and Development of the Incremental Thesaurus for Assessing Causal Maps (ITACM). Tech Know Learn 24, 161–168 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9338-8
- Problem-based learning
- Causal reasoning
- Ill-structured problem solving