Despite the expansion of online and blended learning, as well as open education, until relatively recently little research has been undertaken on what motivates students to enrol in particular study modes at university level. This project contributes to recent scholarship in the field by exploring the reasons why humanities students choose to study through specific modes. The research was conducted between October 2013 and March 2014 administering three waves of data collection to over 700 students who were enrolled in humanities units being offered simultaneously through three different modes: on-campus, distance, and open and online. The findings suggest that students choose different enrolment modes based on factors such as personal, learning support, environment, advice and marketing, teaching and learning as well as logistics. However, the importance students ascribe to particular factors changes during their educational experience. This study found significant differences in the importance of factors between initial and subsequent choices of enrolment mode, suggesting that the ‘lived’ experience of students at university influences their perception of which factors are important.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2006). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States. Needham: The Sloan Consortium.
Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning and Instruction, 4(2), 1–14.
Artino, A. R, Jr. (2010). Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students’ choice of institutional format. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 272–276.
Aspden, L., & Helm, P. (2004). Making the connection in a blended learning environment. Educational Media International, 41(3), 245–252.
Australian Vice-Chancellor’s Committee. (2007). Australian university student finances 2006.
Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-Learning and distance education. London: Routledge.
Booth, A. (1997). Listening to students: Experiences and expectations in the transition to a history degree. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 205–220.
Bornholt, L., Gientzotis, J., & Cooney, G. (2004). Understanding choice behaviours: Pathways from school to university with changing aspirations and opportunities. Social Psychology of Education, 7(2), 211–228. doi:10.1023/B:SPOE.0000018560.99580.2a.
Bradley, D. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report.
Braun, T. (2008). making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 63–92.
Brown, J. L. M. (2012). Online learning: A comparison of web-based and land-based courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 39–42.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
Cebula, R. J., & Lopes, J. (1982). Determinants of student choice of undergraduate major field. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 303–312.
Chapman, D. W. (1981). A model of student college choice. Journal of Higher Education, 52(5), 490–505.
Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Auld, D. P. (2010). The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 349–364.
Cohen, V. (2003). A model for assessing distance learning instruction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 98–120. doi:10.1007/bf02940940.
Colorado, J., & Eberle, J. (2010). Student demographics and success in online learning environments. Emporia State Research Studies, 46(1), 4–10.
Currie, J. (2003). Australian universities as enterprise universities: Transformed players on a global stage. In G. Breton & M. Lambert (Eds.), Universities and globalization: Private linkages, public trust (pp. 179–194). Paris: UNESCO.
de Zilwa, D. (2010). Academic units in a complex, changing world. Adaptation and resistance. Heidelberg: Springer.
Ding, H., & Boody, R. M. (2011). Reasons why students attend Open University in China. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 40–52.
Dobozy, E., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Initial teacher education by open and distance modes a snapshot of e-competency experiences in Australia. eLearning Papers, 38, 43–54.
Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competencies for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 65–72.
Gosper, M., Malfroy, J., & McKenzie, J. (2013). Students’ experiences and expectations of technologies: An Australian study designed to inform planning and development decisions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 268–282.
Greenland, S. J., & Moore, C. (2014). Patterns of student enrolment and attrition in Australian open access online education: A preliminary case study. Open Praxis, 6(1), 45–54.
Hagel, P., & Shaw, R. N. (2010). How important is study mode in student university choice? Higher Education Quarterly, 64(2), 161–182.
Hannay, M., & Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of online and tradtional learning. Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 1–11.
Harkera, D., Sladea, P., & Harkera, M. (2001). Exploring the decision process of school leavers’ and ‘mature students’ in university choice. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 11(2), 1–20. doi:10.1300/J050v11n02_01.
Harrington, R., & Loffredo, D. A. (2010). MBTI personality type and other factors that relate to preference for online verse face-to-face instruction. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 89–95.
Hayes, T. J. (1989). How students choose a college. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 2(1), 19–28.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. doi:10.1007/bf02319856.
Hrastinski, S., & Jaldemark, J. (2012). How and why do students of higher education participate in online seminars? Education and Information Technologies, 17(3), 253–271. doi:10.1007/s10639-011-9155-y.
Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing between online and face-to-face courses: Community college student voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 27–38.
James, R. (2000). How school-leavers choose a preferred university course and possible effects on the quality of the school-university transition. Journal of Institutional Research, 9(1), 78–88.
James, R., Wyn, J., Baldwin, G., Hepworth, G., McInnes, C., & Stephanou, A. (1999). Rural and isolated students and their higher education choices: A re-examination of student location, socio-economic background, and educational advantage and disadvantage. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Johnson, R., Stewart, C., & Bachman, C. (2013). What drives students to complete online courses? What drives faculty to teach online? Validating a measure of motivation orientation in university students and faculty. Interactive Learning Environments,. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.788037.
Lefoe, G., & Albury, R. (2004). Editorial. Educational Media International, 41, 181–182.
Lefoe, G., & Hedberg, J. (2006). Blending on and off campus: A tale of two cities. In C. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning environments: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 325–337). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
McInnis, C., & Hartley, R. (2002). Managing Study and Work: The impact of full-time study and paid work on the undergraduate experience in Australian universities. Department of Education, Science and Training, Commonwealth of Australia.
Moore, M. G., & Kearskey, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont: Wadsworth.
O’Neil, D. K., & Sai, T. H. (2014). Why not? Examining college students’ reasons for avoiding an online course. Higher Education, 68(1), 1–14.
Paechter, M. M., & Maier, B. (2010). Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 292–297.
Paloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Price, L. (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: Challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 6(2), 367–379.
Romero, M., & Usart, M. (2014). The temporal perspective in higher education learners: Comparisons between online and onsite learning. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(1), 190–209.
Stacey, E., & Wiesenberg, F. (2007). A study of face-to-face and online teaching philosophies in Canada and Australia. Journal of Distance Education, 22(1), 19–40.
Sugahara, S., Boland, G., & Cilloni, A. (2008). Factors Influencing students’ choice of an Accounting major in Australia. Accounting Education, 17(Sup1), 37–54. doi:10.1080/09639280802009199.
Tsay, M. H., Morgan, G., & Quick, D. (2000). predicting students’ ratings of the importance of strategies to facilitate self-directed distance learning in Taiwan. Distance Education, 21(1), 49–65.
Wolming, S., & Mahieu, R. (2013). Motive for lifelong learners to choose web-based courses. Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16(1), 1–10.
Woo, K., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Preston, G., Green, D., & Phillips, R. (2008). Web-based lecture technologies: Blurring the boundaries between face-to-face and distance learning. Research in Learning Technology, 16(2), 81–93. doi:10.1080/09687760802315895.
Young, A., & Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses fron the students’ perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 107–115.
Ziguras, C., & McBurnie, G. (2011). Transnational higher education in the Asia-Pacific region: From distance education to the branch campus. In S. Marginson, S. Kaur, & E. Sawir (Eds.), Higher education in the Asia-Pacific (Vol. 36, pp. 105–122)., Higher education dynamics Amsterdam: Springer.
Funding for this research was generously provided by Macquarie University under its Learning and Teaching grant scheme. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their detailed and helpful feedback.
About this article
Cite this article
Bailey, M., Ifenthaler, D., Gosper, M. et al. The Changing Importance of Factors Influencing Students’ Choice of Study Mode. Tech Know Learn 20, 169–184 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9253-9
- Educational pathways
- Study mode
- Higher education
- Humanities students
- Open education