Advertisement

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 103–120 | Cite as

A Framework for Learning About Big Data with Mobile Technologies for Democratic Participation: Possibilities, Limitations, and Unanticipated Obstacles

  • Thomas M. PhilipEmail author
  • Sarah Schuler-Brown
  • Winmar Way
Article

Abstract

As Big Data becomes increasingly important in policy-making, research, marketing, and commercial applications, we argue that literacy in this domain is critical for engaged democratic participation and that peer-generated data from mobile technologies offer rich possibilities for students to learn about this new genre of data. Through the lens of what we term the paradigms of technology and cutting-edge content as an educational end, means, and equalizer, we explore how learning about Big Data with mobile technologies exists at the critical intersection of issues such as the purpose of schooling, global competitiveness, corporate profit, student agency, and democratic participation. These competing interests surface tensions at the classroom, institutional, and societal levels. Engaging these tensions, we offer a framework of student objectives for learning about Big Data with mobile technologies. Through a reflection on the challenges we continue to encounter as we attempt to implement innovative curriculum within the constraints of urban public schools, we hope to prompt dialogue and changes in practice with respect to what it means to learn for democratic participation using Big Data.

Keywords

Big Data Mobile technology Learning Democratic participation Ideology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSF grant MSP-0962919.

References

  1. Amichaihamburger, Y., McKenna, K., & Tal, S. (2008). E-empowerment: Empowerment by the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1776–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. Q., & Rainie, L. (2012). Big data: Experts say new forms of information will help people be more nimble and adaptive, but worry over humans’ capacity to understand and use these new tools well. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, S. E. (2011). Big data: The new information challenge. Online, 35(2), 27–29.Google Scholar
  4. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematical worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238–266.Google Scholar
  7. Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M. S., & Hodge, L. (2009). An interpretative scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.Google Scholar
  8. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  10. Duhigg, C. (2012, February 16). How companies learn your secrets. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/magazine/shopping-habits.html?pagewanted=all.
  11. Freire, P. (2001). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Giroux, H. A. (2001). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  13. Goode, E. (2011, August 15). Sending the police before there is a crime. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/16/us/16police.html.
  14. Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of ‘ideology’: Return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch, T. Bennet, J. Curran & J. Wollacott (Eds.), Culture, society and the media (pp. 56–90). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  16. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Helft, M. (2008, November 11). Google uses searches to track flu’s spread. The New York Times, p. A1.Google Scholar
  18. Hochschild, J., & Scovronick, N. (2003). The American dream and the public schools. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Howard, P. N. (2005). Deep democracy, thin citizenship: The impact of digital media in political campaign strategy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597(1), 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ito, M., Okabe, D., & Matsuda, M. (2005). Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Klein, H. K., & Kleinmann, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(1), 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  23. Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality globalization, and urban school reform. New York: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipman, P., & Hursh, D. (2007). Renaissance 2010: The reassertion of ruling-class power through neoliberal policies in Chicago. Policy futures in education, 5(2), 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loukides, M. (2010). What is data science? The future belongs to the companies and people that turn data into products. Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/06/what-is-data-science.html.
  26. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_innovation.
  27. Martin, D. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338.Google Scholar
  28. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Introduction to mulitmedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLaren, P. (1994). Life in schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  30. Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html.
  32. Neill, M. (1995). Computers, thinking and schools in the new world order. In J. Brook & I. A. Boal (Eds.), Resisting the virtual life: The culture and politics of information (pp. 181–194). San Francisco, CA: City Lights.Google Scholar
  33. Newman, A. A. (2011, December 22). Using Google’s data to reach consumers. The New York times, p. B3.Google Scholar
  34. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2012). Obama administration unveilsBig Datainitiative: Announces $200 million in new R&D investments. Retrieved from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/…/big_data_press_release_final_2.pdf.Google Scholar
  35. Office of the White House Press Secretary. (2009). President Obama launchesEducate to Innovatecampaign for excellence in science, technology, engineering & math (STEM) education. Retrieved from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-launches-educate-innovate-campaign-excellence-science-technology-en.
  36. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf.
  37. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. d. Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rose, M. (2009). Why school? New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
  40. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  41. Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., & Williams, S. (2001). Digital divide or digital opportunity? The role of technology in overcoming social exclusion in U.S. education. Educational Policy, 15(2), 258–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shekhar, S. (2011). What is special about mining spatial and spatio-temporal datasets? Paper presented at The International Symposium on Spatial-Temporal Analysis and Data Mining. London, UK: University College.Google Scholar
  43. Thackeray, R., & Hunter, M. (2010). Empowering youth: Use of technology in advocacy to affect social change. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(4), 575–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01503.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thrift, N. (2006). Re-inventing invention: New tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society, 35(2), 279–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tuhiwai-Smith, L. (2002). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  46. Tyack, D. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (2001). Progress or regress? In L. Iura (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on school reform (pp. 5–42). San Francisco, CA: Wiley Company.Google Scholar
  48. Valaitis, R. K. (2005). Computers and the internet: Tools for youth empowerment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(5), e51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wider Opportunities for Women. (2010). The basic economic security tables for the United States. Retrieved from http://wowonline.org/documents/BESTIndexforTheUnitedStates2010.pdf.
  52. Wraga, W. G. (1994). Democracy’s high school: The comprehensive high school and educational reform in the United States. Lanhan, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  53. Wresch, W. (1996). Disconnected: Haves and have-nots in the information age. New Brunswich, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas M. Philip
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sarah Schuler-Brown
    • 1
  • Winmar Way
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Education and Information StudiesUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations