Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Mapping Pedagogical Opportunities Provided by Mathematics Analysis Software

  • Published:
International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a taxonomy of the pedagogical opportunities that are offered by mathematics analysis software such as computer algebra systems, graphics calculators, dynamic geometry or statistical packages. Mathematics analysis software is software for purposes such as calculating, drawing graphs and making accurate diagrams. However, its availability in classrooms also provides opportunities for positive changes to teaching and learning. Very many examples are documented in the professional and research literature, and in this paper we organize them into 10 types. These are displayed in the form of a ‘pedagogical map’, which further classifies them according to whether the opportunity arises from new opportunities for the mathematical tasks used, change to interpersonal aspects of the classroom or change to the point of view on mathematics as a subject. The map can be used in teacher professional development to draw attention to possibilities for lessons or as a catalyst for professional discussion. For research on teaching, it can be used to map current practice, or to track professional growth. The intention of the map is to summarise the potential benefits of teaching with technology in a form that may be useful for both teachers and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aldon, G. (Ed.). (2009). La function de l’ensegne. Mathématiques dynamiques. (pp. 46–68). Paris, France: Hachette Livre.

  • Artigue, M. (2001). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. Paper presented at CAME 2001 Symposium. Communicating Mathematics Through Computer Algebra Systems. Utrecht, The Netherlands. Retrieved 13th March 2008 from: http://Itsn.mathstore.ac.uk/came/events/freudenthal.

  • Artigue, M. (2005). The integration of symbolic calculators into secondary education: Some lessons from didactical engineering. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven, & L. Trouche (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument (pp. 231–294). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L., & Pierce, R. (2004). CAS: Trainer wheels for algebra using the TI89. In B. Tadich, S. Tobias, C. Brew, B. Beatty, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Towards excellence in mathematics. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the MAV, (pp. 13–21). Melbourne: Mathematical Association of Victoria.

  • Ball, L., & Stacey, K. (2003). What should students record when solving problems with CAS? Reasons, information, the plan and some answers. In J. T. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. Mullin, & R. M. Zbiek (Eds.), Computer algebra systems in secondary school mathematics education (pp. 289–303). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L., & Stacey, K. (2007). Using technology in high-stakes assessment: How teachers balance by-hand and automated techniques. In C.-S. Lim et al. Proceedings of EARCOME4 2007 4th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education, (pp. 90–97) Penang, Malaysia: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

  • Black, T. (1999). Simulations on spreadsheets for complex concepts: Teaching statistical power as an example. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 30(4), 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics : didactique des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (Edited and translated by N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, V. Warfield). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Brown, J. (2005). Affordances of a technology-rich teaching and learning environment. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research, and practice, Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1), (pp. 177–184). Sydney: MERGA.

  • Dickens, C. (1854). Hard Times. Retrieved 5th September 2008 from: http://www.pagebypagebooks.com/.

  • Etlinger, L. (1974). The electronic calculator: A new trend in school mathematics. Educational Technology, XIV(12), 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, P., Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Edwards, I. (2007). Facilitating middle secondary modelling competencies. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA12): Education, engineering and economics (pp. 130–140). Chichester, UK: Horwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, S. (2004). The CAS classroom. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 18(2), 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garry, T. (2003). Computing, conjecturing and confirming with a CAS Tool. In J. T. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. Mullin, & R. M. Zbiek (Eds.), Computer algebra systems in secondary school mathematics education (pp. 289–303). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Towards an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-López, M. J. (2001). Using dynamic geometry software to simulate physical motion. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(2), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heid, M. K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heid, M. K., & Blume, G. W. (2008a). Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Vol. 1: Research syntheses. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heid, M. K., & Blume, G. W. (2008b). Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Vol. 2: Cases and perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugl, H. (1997). Experimental and active learning with DERIVE. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 29(5), 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal, M., & Stacey, K. (2001). The impact of teacher privileging on learning differentiation with technology. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(2), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching of algebra at the middle school through college levels: Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 707–762). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. & Damboise, C. (2007). “How can we describe the relation between the factored form and the expanded form of these trinomials?-We don’t even know if our paper and pencil factorizations are right”: The case for computer algebra systems (CAS) with weaker algebra students. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 105–112). Seoul: PME.

  • Kieran, C., & Yerushalmy, M. (2004). Computer algebra systems and algebra: Curriculum, assessment, teaching, and learning. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI study (pp. 99–154). Norwood, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (2000). Dynamic geometry environments as a source of rich learning contexts for the complex activity of proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1/2), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagrange, J.-B. (2003). Learning techniques and concepts using CAS: A practical and theoretical reflection. In J. T. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. McMullin, & R. M. Zbiek (Eds.), Computer algebra systems in secondary school mathematics education (pp. 269–283). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagrange, J.-B., Artigue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2003). Technology and mathematics education: A multidimensional study of the evolution of research and innovation. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 237–270). Dordecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldknow, A. (1996). Micromaths: Tea cups, T Cubed, discharge and the elimination of drips. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 15(4), 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganise mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2001a). Reflections on the changing pedagogical use of computer algebra systems: Assistance for doing or learning mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(1), 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2001b). Observations on students’ responses to learning in a CAS environment. Mathematical Education Research Journal, 3(1), 28–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2004a). A framework for monitoring progress and planning teaching towards effective use of computer algebra systems. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(1), 59–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2004b). Monitoring progress in algebra in a CAS active context: Symbol Sense, algebraic insight and algebraic expectation. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2006). Enhancing the image of mathematics by association with simple pleasures from real world contexts. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2008). Using pedagogical maps to show the opportunities afforded by CAS for improving the teaching of mathematics. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 22(1), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • RITEMATHS. (n.d.) RITEMATHS project web site. Retrieved August 10th, 2009, from http://extranet.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/DSME/RITEMATHS/.

  • Stacey, K. (2008). Pedagogical maps for describing teaching with technology. Retrieved October 31st, 2008, from http://www.sharinginspiration.org/info/contributions.php?lang=en&size=normal.

  • Thomas, M. O. J., & Holton, D. (2003). Technology as a tool for teaching undergraduate mathematics. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 351–394). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. O. J., Monaghan, J., & Pierce, R. (2004). Computer algebra systems and algebra: Curriculum, assessment, teaching, and learning. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI study (pp. 155–186). Norwood, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, J. (2003). Year 8 students’ reasoning in a Cabri environment. In L. Bragg, C. Campbell, G. Herbert, & J. Mousley (Eds.), Mathematics education researching: Innovation, networking, opportunity. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. (pp. 696–703). Sydney: MERGA.

  • Wander, R., & Pierce, R. (2009). Marina’s fish shop: A mathematically- and technologically-rich lesson. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 65(2), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilf, H. S. (1982). The disc with the college education. The American Mathematical Monthly, 89, 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yearwood, J., & Glover, B. (1995). Computer algebra systems in teaching engineering mathematics. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 6(1), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1169–1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is based in part on research undertaken as part of projects C00002058 and LP 0453701 funded by the Australian Research Council with partners Texas Instruments, Casio and Hewlett-Packard and numerous schools. We thank all the teachers and students who participated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Doug McDonell Building, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Robyn Pierce & Kaye Stacey

Authors
  1. Robyn Pierce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaye Stacey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn Pierce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pierce, R., Stacey, K. Mapping Pedagogical Opportunities Provided by Mathematics Analysis Software. Int J Comput Math Learning 15, 1–20 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9158-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-010-9158-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation