Abstract
Substantial shares of eligible students forgo or lose access to tuition-free college benefits, in part due to limited access to information on eligibility and other requirements. Given students’ dependence on the Internet for information on how to pay for college, we examine the availability and digital accessibility of critical program information on websites for the population of statewide tuition-free (Promise) programs (N = 39). To this end, we use an original dataset on Promise program websites and descriptive quantitative analyses. Drawing on the framework of administrative burdens from public administration, this study sheds light on potential informational barriers (learning costs) students may face in accessing Promise programs benefits. Findings indicate that Promise program websites prominently feature the benefits and requirements for initial eligibility. In contrast, certain eligibility criteria, information on deadlines, and renewal requirements are not readily available. We find limited options for students to contact program representatives and large variability across websites, signaling that programs could learn from others to reduce learning costs for students by providing more accessible information on official program websites.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Not all promise program websites were official state websites. For example, Hawaii Promise is on the University of Hawaii Community Colleges website. PACT is on the Connecticut state colleges and universities system page.
See https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ for more information on WCAG 2.
AChecker Web Accessibility Checker https://achecker.achecks.ca/checker/index.php.
See https://www.ada.gov/ for the latest information on ADA.
References
Ardoin, S. (2017). College aspirations and access in working-class rural communities: The mixed signals, challenges, and new language first-generation students encounter. Lexington Books.
Baekgaard, M., & Tankink, T. (2022). Administrative burden: Untangling a bowl of conceptual spaghetti. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab027
Baker, D., & McCloud, L. (2023). Too much or nothing at all: Racialized administrative burdens and higher education policy communication in Texas. Peabody Journal of Education, 98(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2023.2160159
Basch, C. H., Fera, J., & Garcia, P. (2020). Information regarding Zika virus on the internet: A cross-sectional study of readability. American Journal of Infection Control, 48(6), 714–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.11.014
Bell, E., & Gándara, D. (2021). Can free community college close racial disparities in postsecondary attainment? How Tulsa achieves affects racially minoritized student outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 58(6), 1142–1177. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211003501
Bell, E., & Smith, K. (2022). Working within a system of administrative burden: How street-level bureaucrats’ role perceptions shape access to the promise of higher education. Administration & Society, 54(2), 167–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211027535
Bettinger, E. P., Long, T. L., Oreopoulos, P., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1205–1242. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs017
Billings, M. S., Clayton, A. B., & Worsham, R. (2022). FAFSA and beyond: How advisers manage their administrative burden in the financial aid process. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 51(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1737
Boatman, A., & Evans, B. J. (2017). How financial literacy, federal aid knowledge, and credit market experience predict loan aversion for education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 671(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217695779
Briceño-Mosquera, A. (2023a). They asked for more, more, and more paperwork: Administrative burdens when undocumented youth claim in-state resident tuition policy benefits. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737231182672
Briceño-Mosquera, A. (2023b). Learning, compliance, and psychological burdens when undocumented immigrants claim in-state tuition policy. Research in Higher Education, 65, 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09749-4
Brinck, T., Gergle, D., & Wood, S. (2001). Usability for the web: Designing web sites that work. Morgan Kaufmann.
Brown, C., Murphy, T. J., & Nanny, M. (2003). Turning techno-savvy into info-savvy: Authentically integrating information literacy into the college curriculum. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(6), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2003.08.005
Burton, V. T., & Chadwick, S. A. (2000). Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of criteria for use of internet and library sources. Computers and Composition, 17(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8755-4615(00)00037-2
Carnevale, D. (2005). To size up colleges, students now shop online. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(40), A25. https://www.chronicle.com/article/to-size-up-colleges-students-now-shop-online/
Coker, C., & Glynn, J. (2017). Making college affordable: Providing low-income students with the knowledge and resources needed to pay for college. Jack Kent Cook Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED587381.pdf
Connaway, L. S., Dickey, T. J., & Radford, M. L. (2011). If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it: Convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Library & Information Science Research, 33(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.12.002
Davidson, C. T. (2020). The higher education funding revolution: An exploration of statewide community college free tuition programs. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2018.1558135
Davis, L. A., Wolniak, G. C., George, C. E., & Nelson, G. R. (2019). Demystifying tuition? A content analysis of the information quality of public universities and university websites. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419867650
Eichelberger, B., Mattioli, H., & Foxhoven, R. (2017). Uncovering barriers to financial capability: Underrepresented students’ access to financial resources. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1634
Estabrook, L., Witt, E., & Rainie, L. (2007). Information searches that solve problems. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2007/12/30/information-searches-that-solve-problems/
Everett, A., Rosinger, K., Baker, D. J., Kim, H. J., Kelchen, R., & Ortagus, J. C. (2023). Tennessee’s burden: How students apply for state financial aid within one southern state. InformEdStates Working Paper, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d9f9fae6a122515ee074363/t/63eab6bfcb08812d2c3d93e2/1676326592566/ISPaper_TNAdminBurden.pdf
Federal Student Aid (2024, May). Requesting an interpreterhttps://studentaid.gov/apply-for-aid/fafsa/filling-out/request-interpreter
Gándara, D., & Li, A. (2020). Promise for whom? Free-college programs and enrollments by race and gender classifications at public, 2-year colleges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 603–627. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720962472
Gándara, D., Acevedo, R., Cervantes, D., & Quiroz, M. A. (2023). Advancing a framework of racialized administrative burdens in higher education policy. The Journal of Higher Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2023.2251866
George-Jackson, C., & Gast, M. J. (2015). Addressing information gaps: Disparities in financial awareness and preparedness on the road to college. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 44(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1540
Gigg, R. N. L., Campus, M., PLEXUSS, & StudentBridge (2023). 2023 E-expectations trend report. Ruffalo Noel Levitz. https://RNL.com/Expectations
Goldrick-Rab, S. (2016). Paying the price: College costs, financial aid, and the betrayal of the American dream. University of Chicago Press.
Goldstein, A., Eaton, C., Villalobos, A., Chakrabarti, P., Cohen, J., & Donnelly, K. (2023). Administrative burden in federal student loan repayment, and socially stratified access to income-driven repayment plans. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 9(4), 86–111. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2023.9.4.04
Hannor-Walker, T., Pincus, R., Wright, L. S., Rock, W., Money-Brady, J., & Bohecker, L. (2022). School counselors and administrators agree: Time and testing are barriers. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 18(2), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2022v18n2a1243
Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2018). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. Russell Sage Foundation.
Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. (2020, May 27). Administrative Burdens in the time of COVID-19 [Webinar]. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison. https://youtu.be/s3aWhE2R-5s
Herd, P., Hoynes, H., Michener, J., & Moynihan, D. (2023). Introduction: Administrative burden as a mechanism of inequality in policy implementation. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 9(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2023.9.5.01
Hilts, D., Kratsa, K., Joseph, M., Kolbert, J. B., Crothers, L. M., & Nice, M. L. (2019). School counselors’ perceptions of barriers to implementing a RAMP-designated school counseling program. Professional School Counseling, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X19882646
Holman, L. F., Nelson, J., & Watts, R. (2019). Organizational variables contributing to school counselor burnout: An opportunity for leadership, advocacy, collaboration, and systemic change. The Professional Counselor, 9(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.15241/lfh.9.2.126
Jano, Z., Noor, S. M., Ahmad, R., Saad, M. S. M., Saadan, R., Bokhari, M., & Abdullah, A. N. (2015). Website usability and cultural dimensions in Malaysian and Australian universities. Asian Social Science, 11(9), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n9p1
Kesuma Nasution, D. (2022). Machine translation in website localization: Assessing its translation quality. Al Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 1879–1886. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1308
Kramer, J. W. (2022). Expectations of a promise: The psychological contracts between students, the state, and key actors in a tuition-free college environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 44(4), 759–782. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737221090265
Kwakye, I., & Lacalli, E. (2023). A new approach to increasing awareness of postsecondary opportunities and financial aid in Washington. Embedding a learning agenda into outreach efforts. Washington Student Achievement Council. https://wsac.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2023.06_InformationalVideos_CaseStudy.pdf
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers. NCEE 2017–4023. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Lovell, D. (2022). Administrative burden in the classroom: An embedded mixed-methods study of how external pressure impacts the burden of student success at the community college level. Texas Education Review, 10(2), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/41903
Mankoff, J., Fait, H., & Tran, T. (2005, April 2). Is your web page accessible? A comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind [paper presentation]. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, OR, United States.
Margolin, J., Miller, S. R., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2013). The community college website as virtual advisor: A usability study. Community College Review, 41(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552112471844
Meyer, K. (2008). The virtual Face of institutions: What do home pages reveal about higher education? Innovative Higher Education, 33(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9071-2
Miller-Adams, M., & Iriti, J. (Eds.). (2022). The free college handbook: A practitioner’s guide to promise research. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Monaghan, D. B., & Attewell, P. A. (2023). College promise programs as symbolic politics. Sociology of Education, 00(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407231183459
Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
National Center for Education Statistics (2023). English learners in public schools. Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgf
National Association for College Admission Counseling. (2017). State of college admission report. National Association for College Admission Counseling.
Odle, T. K., Lee, J. C., & Gentile, S. P. (2021). Do promise programs reduce student loans? Evidence from Tennessee Promise. Journal of Higher Education, 92(6), 847–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1888674
Office of English Language Acquisition (2023). The top languages spoken by English learners in the United States. U.S. Department of Education, Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED628854.pdf
Perlow, E. L., Wells, R. S., Hedayet, M., Xia, J., MacLean, H., Ding, E., & McCall, A. (2021). Hidden inequality: Financial aid information available to college students with disabilities attending public four-year institutions. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 50(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1344343
Perna, L. W., & Steele, P. (2011). The role of context in understanding the contributions of financial aid to college opportunity. Teachers College Record, 113(5), 895–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300507
Perna, L. W., Wright-Kim, J., & Jiang, N. (2021). Money matters: Understanding how colleges and universities use their websites to communicate information about how to pay college costs. Educational Policy, 35(7), 1311–1348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904819867398
Poock, M. C., & Lefond, D. (2001). How college-bound prospects perceive university web sites: Findings, implications, and turning browsers into applicants. College & University, 77(1), 15–21. https://www.aacrao.org/docs/default-source/c-u-.pdfs/albvevobtsxy5zyeocxv_summer2001.pdf?sfvrsn=f0e78149_0
Rosinger, K., Meyer, K., & Wang, J. (2021). Leveraging insights from behavioral science and administrative burden in free college program design: A typology. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.42.197
Schudde, L., Jabbar, H., Epstein, E., & Yucel, E. (2021). Students’ sense making of higher education policies during the vertical transfer process. American Educational Research Journal, 58(5), 921–953. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211003050
Slay, K. E., & Glasener, K. M. (2022). Beyond admissions: Advancing equity and success for high-achieving, low-income students through an institutional promise program. In O. A. Poon, & M. N. Bastedo (Eds.), Rethinking college admissions: Research-based practice and policy (pp. 185–204). Harvard Education.
Swanson, E., & Ritter, G. (2020). Start to finish: Examining the impact of the El Dorado Promise on postsecondary outcomes. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 49(N3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.55504/0884-9153.1703
Symonenko, S. (2006). Exploring patterns in website content structure. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Exploring-patterns-in-website-content-structure-Symonenko/2f96ae7520a381b281a8fc70485fce0c4db96d99
Taylor, Z. W., & Bicak, I. (2020). First-generation college student financial aid: Results from a national financial aid jargon survey. College Student Affairs Journal, 38(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/csj.2020.0006
Tennessee Higher Education Commission & Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation (2022). Tennessee Promise Annual Report. https://www.tn.gov/thec/research/tn-promise-annual-report.html
Venegas, K. M. (2006). Internet inequalities: Financial aid, the internet, and low-income students. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1652–1669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206289147
Washington State, F. A. F. S. A., & Completion Dashboard. (2023). https://wsac.wa.gov/fafsa-completion
Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Vigo, M., & Harper, S. (2012). Understanding web accessibility and its drivers. W4A2012-Technical, International World Wide Web Conference. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Simon-Harper-2/publication/235339928_Understanding_web_accessibility_and_its_drivers/links/0046353882e0fa0e7d000000/Understanding-web-accessibility-and-its-drivers.pdf
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Meredith Billings for her comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Funding
We thank the William T. Grant Foundation for supporting this work through a Scholars Award (Grant ID #201035). This research was also supported in part by grant, P2CHD042849, Population Research Center, awarded to the Population Research Center at The University of Texas at Austin by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Denisa Gándara, Rosa Maria Acevedo, Diana Cervantes, Marco Antonio Quiroz, and Isabel McMullen. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Denisa Gándara, Rosa Maria Acevedo, Diana Cervantes, Tarini Kumar, and Isabel McMullen and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Approval was obtained from the Office of Research and Support and Compliance Institutional Review Board at the University of Texas at Austin. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gándara, D., Acevedo, R.M., Cervantes, D. et al. Learning About Tuition-Free College: Evaluating the Availability and Digital Accessibility of Information on Promise Program Websites. Innov High Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09721-9
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09721-9