Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sexual Harassment, Sexual Harassment Climate, and the Well-Being of STEM Faculty Members

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the documented negative outcomes accompanying sexual harassment, the experience of sexual harassment among STEM faculty members remains underexamined. In this paper, we explore how two sexual harassment variables—gender harassment and sexual harassment climate—are linked to four facets of faculty well-being: job burnout, turnover intentions, psychological distress, and self-rated physical health. Using data from STEM faculty at a mid-sized university located in the upper Midwest (N = 117 faculty members), we find gender harassment is associated with lower self-rated physical health and higher turnover intentions among women STEM faculty. In contrast, gender harassment was not significant in predicting well-being outcomes among men STEM faculty. Instead, the sexual harassment climate features more prominently in the experiences of STEM men faculty, with the perception that sexual harassment charges will be treated seriously (the sexual harassment climate) being negatively related to men’s job burnout and psychological distress and positively related to men’s self-rated physical health. Taken together, our findings extend the existing literature by documenting that outcomes for STEM men faculty are more strongly shaped by the perceived institutional climate surrounding sexual harassment, whereas women’s outcomes are more intricately linked to experiencing gender harassment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data are available upon request from the authors.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krista Lynn Minnotte.

Ethics declarations

Declarations

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. The study was funded by a small internal grant from the authors’ university. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for the authors’ university. The data are available upon request from the authors. Both authors were equally responsible for the study design and the collection of data. The first author was primarily responsible for the for conducting the statistical analyses and writing the introduction, literature review, and discussion. The second author was primarily responsible for writing the method and findings sections.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minnotte, K.L., Pedersen, D.E. Sexual Harassment, Sexual Harassment Climate, and the Well-Being of STEM Faculty Members. Innov High Educ 48, 601–618 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09645-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09645-w

Keyword

Navigation