The cost of access to scholarly research creates inequity for readers with varying resources. Open access publishing is an avenue to address this inequity. This research employed a survey of scholars to discover what they know and think about open access. The survey elicited both faculty and doctoral student perspectives. Data were analyzed according to rank and discipline. Although the majority of scholars across disciplines agreed that their work should be freely available to all readers, there were significant differences between disciplines regarding whether scholars had distributed their publications through open access. The survey instrument was examined through Exploratory Factor Analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Austin, A. E. (1991). Faculty cultures, faculty values. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1990(68), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019906807.
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701.
Björk, B. C., Laakso, M., Welling, P., & Paetau, P. (2014). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22963.
Carpenter, J. (2012). Researchers of tomorrow: The research behaviour of generation Y doctoral students. Information Services & Use, 32(1/2), 3–17.
Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University School of Education (2018). Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu
Dubinsky, E. (2014). A current snapshot of institutional repositories: Growth rate, disciplinary content and faculty contributions. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communications, 2(3), 1167. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1167.
Fan, W., & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015.
Gaines, A. M. (2015). From concerned to cautiously optimistic: Assessing faculty perceptions and knowledge of open access in a campus-wide study. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1212.
Gargouri, Y., Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). Green and gold open access percentages and growth, by discipline. https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3664
Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. https://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0606/0606079.pdf
Harley, D., Acord, S., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S. and King, C. (2010). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education. http://escholarship.org/uc/cshe_fsc
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R. C., & Wulfson, K. (2013). Ithaka S+R US faculty survey 2012. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/sites/default/files/reports/Ithaka_SR_US_Faculty_Survey_2012_FINAL.pdf
Kim, J. (2010). Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1909–1922. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21336
Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.02.017
Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Schmidt, H., & Mayer, B. (1998). The revised version of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED-R): Factor structure in normal children. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00130-5
Rodriguez, J. E. (2014). Awareness and attitudes about open access publishing: A glance at generational differences. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.013
Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/9780262517638_Open_Access_PDF_Version.pdf
Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access: An evidence-based review. F1000research, 5. https://f1000research.com/articles/5-632/v3
Tmava, A. M., & Miksa, S. D. (2017). Factors influencing faculty attitudes towards open access institutional repositories. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 519–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401061
Wang, X., Liu, C., Mao, W., & Fang, Z. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555–564 https://f1000research.com/articles/5-632/v3
Williams, L. J. (2011). Decomposing model fit: Measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020539
Yang, Z. Y. L., & Li, Y. (2015). University faculty awareness and attitudes towards open access publishing and the institutional repository: A case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1210
Zoski, K. W., & Jurs, S. (1996). An objective counterpart to the visual scree test for factor analysis: The standard error scree. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(3), 443–451.
Dr. Fitzgerald – Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Revising and Editing.
Dr. Jiang – Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft.
The authors did not receive any funding for this research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fitzgerald, S.R., Jiang, Z. Scholarly Publishing at a Crossroads: Scholarly Perspectives on Open Access. Innov High Educ 45, 457–469 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09508-8
- Open access
- Scholarly publishing
- University faculty
- Doctoral students
- Research universities