Abstract
Designers of professional development activities and programs within higher education generally believe workshop learning outcomes and learner-created materials are what graduate students and postdoctoral scholars value from participating in these activities. We created a new structure for online synchronous workshops that integrates active learning, participant reflection, and skill development. Our design was informed by the hypothesis that participants value the work that they do and the materials they create during our online workshops. In our evaluations we examined students’ self-reported behavioral and attitudinal changes and perspectives on professional development. We learned that participants considered their sense of community and opportunities for reflection to be valued elements of the workshops. We found that these workshops added to students’ self-reflective practices and skill-building processes. Participants suggested that workshops should integrate active learning and skills application with deliberate reflection and community building to increase the potential for long-term change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, A. E., Campa, H., III, Pfund, C., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Mathieu, R., & Stoddart, J. (2009). Preparing STEM doctoral students for future faculty careers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 117, 83–95.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Davis, G. (2005). Doctors without orders: Highlights of the sigma xi postdoc survey. American Scientist, 93(3), supplement not paginated.
Denecke, D., Feaster, K., & Stone, K. (2017). Professional development: Shaping effective programs for STEM graduate students. Retrieved from https://cgsnet.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/CGS_ProfDev_STEMGrads16_web.pdf
Fuhrmann, C. N. (2016). Enhancing graduate and postdoctoral education to create a sustainable biomedical workforce. Human Gene Therapy, 27, 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2016.154
Fuhrmann, C. N., Halme, D. G., O'Sullivan, P. S., & Lindstaedt, B. (2011). Improving graduate education to support a branching career pipeline: Recommendations based on a survey of doctoral students in the basic biomedical sciences. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-02-0013
Goodwin, S. S. (2014). iBiology: Communicating the process of science. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 25, 2217–2219. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-02-0756
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.
Helm, M., Campa, H., III, & Moretto, K. (2012). Professional socialization for the Ph.D.: An exploration of career and professional development preparedness and readiness for Ph.D. candidates. Journal of Faculty Development, 26, 5–23.
Hill, L., & Austin, A. E. (2016, September). The impact of multi-institutional STEM reform networks: A case study of CIRTL. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Hokanson, S. C., Campa, H. III, & Goldberg, B.B. (2017, March). Professional development re-imagined: Designing active learning workshops for postdocs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Postdoctoral Association, San Francisco, CA.
Lee, S. P., McGee, R., Pfund, C., & Branchaw, J. (2015). Mentoring up: Learning to manage your mentoring relationships. In G. Wright (Ed.), The mentoring continuum: From graduate school through tenure (pp. 133–154). Syracuse, NY: The Graduate School Press.
McDaniels, M., Pfund, C., & Barnicle, K. (2016). Creating dynamic learning communities in synchronous online courses: One approach from the Center for the Integration of research, teaching and learning (CIRTL). Online Learning, 20, 110–129.
Meyers, F. J., Mathur, A., Fuhrmann, C. N., O'Brien, T. C., Wefes, I., Labosky, P. A., …, Chalkley, R. (2016). The origin and implementation of the broadening experiences in scientific training programs: An National Institutes of Health common fund initiative. The FASEB Journal, 30, 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.15-276139
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Pfund, C., Mathieu, R., Austin, A., Connolly, M., Manske, B., & Moore, K. (2012). Advancing STEM undergraduate learning: Preparing the nation's future faculty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(6), 64–72.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012). Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PLoS One, 7(5), e36307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036307
Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Health Communication, 2(4), 2–52. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1654.100093
Wei, C. W., & Chen, N. S. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9234-9
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2006). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Williams, S. N., Thakore, B. K., & McGee, R. (2015). Coaching to augment mentoring to achieve faculty diversity: A randomized controlled trial. Academic Medicine, 91, 1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001026
Wilson-Grau, R. (2019). Outcome harvesting: Principles, steps, and evaluation applications. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Acknowledgements
Our thanks to Catherine Jett for assisting with survey data analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hokanson, S.C., Grannan, S., Greenler, R. et al. A Study of Synchronous, Online Professional Development Workshops for Graduate Students and Postdocs Reveals the Value of Reflection and Community Building. Innov High Educ 44, 385–398 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-9470-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-9470-6