Skip to main content
Log in

Applying Learning Analytics to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we report on the findings of a project funded by the Australian Office for Learning and Teaching and entitled “Learning Analytics: Assisting Universities with Student Retention.” While this project was primarily focused on retention as a potential outcome of learning analytics, its application could be related to the broader concept of student success. Student success allows for a focus on pedagogy and the use of learning analytics for the improvement of learning and teaching with a firm scholarly evidence base. The data gathered for the project provide the background for a discussion about the potential of learning analytics to inform the practice of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. A case study demonstrates the potential of this approach. Overall, clear pedagogical questions are important in the application of learning analytics to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, and we suggest potential ways to explore pedagogical questions with big data methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Academic staff” is the common term in an Australian context, the North American equivalent of which is the term “faculty”.

  2. A data stream is defined in Information Technology (IT) as a set of digital signals used for different kinds of content transmission (https://www.techopedia.com/definition/6757/data-stream).

References

  • Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 380–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, K., & Pistilli, M. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ‘12), Vancouver, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330666

  • Bawa, P. (2016, Jan-March). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions – a literature review. Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777

  • Boyer, E. (1991). The scholarship of teaching from: Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. College Teaching, 39(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1991.10532213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Retrieved from www.mq.edu.au/pubstatic/public/download.jsp?id=111997

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., DeBlois, P., & Oblinger, D. (2007). Academic analytics: A new tool for a new era. Educause Review, 42(4), 40–57. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/article-downloads/erm0742.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdry, H., Crawford, C., Dearden, L., Goodman, A., & Vignoles, A. (2013). Widening participation in higher education: Analysis using linked administrative data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 176, 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01043.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Nelson, K., & Stoodley, I. (2013). The place of higher education institutions in assessing student engagement, success and retention. Proceedings of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Conference, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/60024/2/60024.pdf

  • Clow, D. (2013). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK ‘13), Leuven, Belgium. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460332

  • Cochran, J., Campbell, S., Baker, H., & Leeds, E. (2014). The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education, 55(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, G., Pechenizkiy, M., & Vleeshouwers, J. (2009). Predicting students’ drop out: A case study. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM '09), Cordoba, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.educationaldatamining.org/EDM2009/uploads/proceedings/dekker.pdf

  • del Mar Casanovas-Rubio, M., Ahearn, A., Ramos, G., & Popo-Ola, S. (2016). The research-teaching nexus: Using a construction teaching event as a research tool. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 53(1), 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, D. (2000). Comparison of student characteristics, and evaluation of student success, in an online health education course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from http://home.earthlink.net/~davidpdiaz/LTS/pdf_docs/dissertn.pdf

  • Elton, L. (2005). Scholarship and the research and teaching nexus. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 108–118). Maidenhead, United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners drop out. Retrieved from http://www.workforce.com/articles/why-online-learners-drop-out

  • Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N., Long, P., & Dawson, S. (2014). Editorial – inaugural issue of the Journal of Learning Analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijser, H., West, D., & Heath, D. (2016). The potential of learning analytics to systematically address diverse learning needs and improve student retention in Australian higher education. Advances in SoTL, 3(1). Retrieved from http://tlc.suss.edu.sg/research/advsotl-2016/pdf/SoTL-Volume03-Number01.pdf

  • James, R., Krause, K., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-transition-pedagogy-report-qut-2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Kift, S., Nelson, K., & Clarke, J. (2010). Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE - A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. (2002). Small-scale research: Pragmatic inquiry in social science and the caring professions. London, England: SAGE.

  • Long, P., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(4), 31–40. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/penetrating-fog-analytics-learning-and-education

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K., Creagh, T., Kift, S., & Clarke, J. (2014). Transition pedagogy handbook: A good practice guide for policy and practice in the First Year Experience at QUT (2nd ed.). Brisbane, Australia: QUT. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/76333/1/Transition_Pedagogy_Handbook_2014.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K., Kift, S., & Clarke, J. (2012). A transition pedagogy for student engagement and first-year learning, success and retention. In I. Solomonides, A. Reid, & P. Petocz (Eds.), Engaging with learning in higher education (pp. 117–144). Faringdon, United Kingdom: Libri Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D., & Baer, L. (2013). Building organizational capacity for analytics. Boulder, CO: Educause. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB9012.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, J., & Rice, M. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes and satisfaction between traditional and web based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/rivera53.html

  • Schaeffer, C., & Konetes, G. (2010). Impact of learner engagement on attrition rates and student success in online learning. International journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(5). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/journal/may_10/article01.htm

  • Siemens, G. (2010). What are learning analytics? Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/08/25/what-are-learning-analytics/

  • Siemens, G., Dawson, S., & Lynch, G. (2013). Improving the productivity of the higher education sector: Policy and strategy for systems-level deployment of learning analytics. Canberra, Australia: Society for Learning Analytics Research/Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/projects/SoLAR_Report_2014.pdf

  • Thomas, L. (2002). Widening participation in post-compulsory education. Education & Training, 44, 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/et.2002.44.4_5.241.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2009) Taking student retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of university. Australian Learning and Teaching Council First Year Experience Curriculum Design Symposium. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.fyecd2009.qut.edu.au/resources/SPE_VincentTinto_5Feb09.pdf

  • Trigwell, K. (2012). Scholarship of teaching and learning. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus: A learning-centred approach (pp. 253–267). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, I. (2010). The changing relationship between the scholarship of teaching (and learning) and universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J. (2016). A theoretically grounded framework for integrating the scholarship of teaching and learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., & Farmer, T. (2012). Online course offerings: Issues of retention and professional relationship skill development. In J. Tareilo & B. Bizzell (Eds.), NCPEA handbook of online instruction and programs in education leadership (pp. 73–79). Ypsilanti, MI: NCPEA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D., Heath, D., & Huijser, H. (2016a). Let’s talk learning analytics: A framework for implementation in relation to student retention. OLC Online Learning Journal, 20(2). Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/792/202

  • West, D., Huijser, H., & Heath, D. (2016b). Putting an ethical lens on learning analytics. Educational Technology Research & Development, 64, 903–922.

  • West, D., Huijser, H., Bronnimann, J., Miles, C., Toohey, D., & Lizzio, A. (2015a). Learning analytics: Assisting universities with student retention. Sydney, Australia: Australian Office for Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D., Huijser, H., Heath, D., Lizzio, A., Toohey, D., & Miles, C. (2015b). Higher education teachers' experiences with learning analytics in relation to student retention. In T. Reiners, B. R. von Konsky, D. Gibson, V. Chang, L. Irving, & K. Clarke (Eds.), Globally Connected, Digitally Enabled: Proceedings of the ascilite 2015 Conference (pp. 296–307), Perth, Australia, 29 November-2 December.

  • Willcoxson, L., Manning, M., Wynder, M., Hibbins, R., Joy, S., Thomas, J., et al. (2011). The whole of university experience: Retention, attrition, learning and personal support interventions during undergraduate business studies - Project Report. Sydney, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henk Huijser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bronnimann, J., West, D., Huijser, H. et al. Applying Learning Analytics to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Innov High Educ 43, 353–367 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9431-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-018-9431-5

Keywords

Navigation