Advertisement

Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 375–386 | Cite as

Examining Ableism in Higher Education through Social Dominance Theory and Social Learning Theory

  • Shanna K. Kattari
Article

Abstract

In most societies, some social identity groups hold a disproportionate amount of social, cultural, and economic power, while other groups hold little. In contemporary U.S. society, examples of this power are evident around issues of ability/disability, with able-bodied individuals wielding social dominance and people with disabilities experiencing a lack of social, cultural, and economic power. However, this relationship between able-bodied individuals and people with disabilities is neither static nor determinant; and through social modeling it may be altered to foster increased positive outcomes for people with disabilities, including both undergraduate and graduate students. As educators and institutional staff members frequently engage with students with disabilities, improving ally behavior and overall accessibility will increase rapport building with students, leading to more just and equitable interactions.

Keywords

ableism ally behavior diversity disability higher education 

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Batalha, L., Reynolds, K., & Newbigin, C. (2011). All else being equal: Are men always higher in social dominance orientation than women? European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 796–806. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.829
  3. Brauer, J. R., & Tittle, C. R. (2012). Social learning theory and human reinforcement. Sociological Spectrum, 32, 157–177. doi: 10.1080/02732173.2012.646160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broido, E. M. (2000). The development of social justice allies during college: A phenomenological investigation. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 3–18.Google Scholar
  5. Denhart, H. (2008). Deconstructing barriers perceptions of students labeled with learning disabilities in higher education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 483–497. doi: 10.1177/0022219408321151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Draughn, T., Elkins, B., & Roy, R. (2002). Allies in the struggle: Eradicating homophobia and heterosexism on campus. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 6(3–4), 9–20. doi: 10.1300/J155v06n03_02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farnall, O., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Reactions to people with disabilities: Personal contact versus viewing of specific media portrayals. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 659–672. doi: 10.1177/107769909907600404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ford, A. (2009). It’s not just about racism, but ableism. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 26(4), 16.Google Scholar
  9. Franks, C. M. (1974). Social learning theory after two decades. Contemporary Psychology, 19, 302–303.Google Scholar
  10. Garland-Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal, 14(3), 1–32. doi: 10.2307/4316922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hehir, T. (2002). Eliminating ableism in education. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutcheon, E. J., & Wolbring, G. (2012). Voices of “disabled” post secondary students: Examining higher education “disability” policy using an ableism lens. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 5(1), 39–49. doi: 10.1037/a0027002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marks, D. (1996). Able-bodied dilemmas in teaching disability studies. Feminism and Psychology, 6, 69–73. doi: 10.1177/0959353596061009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Massengill, D. (2004). Adding insult to injury: Disability-based hostile environment under the ADA. Employee Relations Law Journal, 30, 74–88.Google Scholar
  15. Mearns, J. (2009). Social learning theory. In Encyclopedia of human relationships online. Retrieved from http://0-www.credoreference.com.bianca.penlib.du.edu/entry/sagehumanr/social_learning_theory
  16. Middleton, V. A., Anderson, S. K., & Banning, J. H. (2009). The journey to understanding privilege: A meta-narrative approach. Journal of Transformative Education, 7, 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palmeri, T. (May 14, 2013) Rich Manhattan mom hires handicapped tour guides so kids can cut lines at Disney World. New York Post. Retrieved from http://nypost.com/2013/05/14/rich-manhattan-moms-hire-handicapped-tour-guides-so-kids-can-cut-lines-at-disney-world/
  18. Parashar, D., & Devanathan, N. (2006). Still not in vogue: The portrayal of disability in magazine advertising. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 37(1), 13–20.Google Scholar
  19. Pease, B. (2010). Undoing privilege: Unearned advantage in a divided world. New York, NY: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  20. Pettijohn, T. F., & Walzer, A. S. (2008). Reducing racism, sexism, and homophobia in college students by completing a psychology of prejudice course. College Student Journal, 42, 459–468.Google Scholar
  21. Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Sellers, C. S., Thomas Winfree Jr, L., Madensen, T. D., Daigle, L. E., Fearn, N. E., & Gau, J. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta‐analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 765–802. doi: 10.1080/07418820903379610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rauscher, L., & McClintock, J. (1996). Ableism curriculum design. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffen (Eds.), Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice (pp. 198–231). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Rogers, A., McRee, N., & Arntz, D. L. (2009). Using a college human sexuality course to combat homophobia. Sex Education, 9, 211–225. doi: 10.1080/14681810903059052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Social identity, system justification and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823–844. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00400.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Laar, C. V., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Social dominance theory (2011). Social dominance theory. In Dowdin, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of power (pp. 613-614). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Solórzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69, 60–73.Google Scholar
  31. Spencer, M. S. (1998). Reducing racism in schools: Moving beyond rhetoric. Children & Schools, 20, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking and learning. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13(2), 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Storey, K. (2007). Combating ableism in schools. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52, 56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Thyer, B. A., & Myers, L. L. (1998). Social learning theory. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1, 33–52. doi: 10.1300/J137v01n01_03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tisdell, E. J. (1993). Feminism and adult learning: Power, pedagogy, and praxis. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 57, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United States Code (2008). Americans with disabilities act of 1990, as amended. Retrieved from http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm
  38. United States Census Bureau (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p70-131.pdf
  39. United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division (2011). Information and technical assistance on the Americans with Disabilities Act. Retrieved from http://www.ada.gov/taman3.html
  40. Walls, N.E. (2005). Modern forms of prejudice in the social dominance theoretical framework: Positively valenced attitudes as hierarchy-enhancing legitimizing myths (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://etd.nd.edu/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-07132005-170304/
  41. Washington, J., & Evans, N. J. (1991). Becoming an ally. In N. J. Evans & V. A. Wall (Eds.), Beyond tolerance: Gays, lesbians, and bisexuals on campus (pp. 195–204). Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.Google Scholar
  42. Wolbring, G. (2008). The politics of ableism. Development, 51, 252–258. doi: 10.1057/dev.2008.17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolbring, G. (2012). Ethical theories and discourse through an ability expectations and ableism lens: The case of enhancement and global regulation. Asian Bioethics Review, 4, 393–309. doi: 10.153/asb/2012/0033 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Social WorkUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations