Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 291–303 | Cite as

What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching

  • Lillian MacNellEmail author
  • Adam Driscoll
  • Andrea N. Hunt


Student ratings of teaching play a significant role in career outcomes for higher education instructors. Although instructor gender has been shown to play an important role in influencing student ratings, the extent and nature of that role remains contested. While difficult to separate gender from teaching practices in person, it is possible to disguise an instructor’s gender identity online. In our experiment, assistant instructors in an online class each operated under two different gender identities. Students rated the male identity significantly higher than the female identity, regardless of the instructor’s actual gender, demonstrating gender bias. Given the vital role that student ratings play in academic career trajectories, this finding warrants considerable attention.


gender inequality gender bias student ratings of teaching student evaluations of instruction 


  1. Abrami, P. C., d’Apollonia, S., & Rosenfield, S. (2007). The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 385–445). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, job, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, K., & Miller, E. D. (1997). Gender and student evaluations of teaching. Ps-Political Science and Politics, 30, 216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, G. D. (1981). Parametric statistics and ordinal data: A pervasive misconception. Nursing Research, 30, 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students' evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 48, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basow, S. A. (1995). Student evaluations of college professors: When gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 656–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basow, S. A., & Montgomery, S. (2005). Student ratings and professor self-rating of college teaching: Effects of gender and divisional affiliation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basow, S. A., Phelan, J. E., & Capotosto, L. (2006). Gender patterns in college students' choices of their best and worst professors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: Are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, S. K. (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: Evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benton, S. L., & Cashin, W. E. (2014). Student ratings of instruction in college and university courses. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 279–326). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burns-Glover, A. L., & Veith, D. J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluations: Sex still makes a difference. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 69–80.Google Scholar
  13. Centra, J. A. (2007). Differences in responses to the student instructional report: Is it bias? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  14. Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education, 71, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chamberlin, M. S., & Hickey, J. S. (2001). Student evaluations of faculty performance: The role of gender expectations in differential evaluations. Educational Research Quarterly, 25, 3–14.Google Scholar
  16. Curtis, J. W. (2011). Persistent inequity: Gender and academic employment. Report from the American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from
  17. Dalmia, S., Giedeman, D. C., Klein, H. A., & Levenburg, N. M. (2005). Women in academia: An analysis of their expectations, performance and pay. Forum on Public Policy, 1, 160–177.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, B. G. (2009). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Feldman, K. A. (1992). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments – Part 1. Research in Higher Education, 33, 317–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments – Part 2. Research in Higher Education, 34, 151–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaito, J. (1980). Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 564–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garson, G. D. (2012). General linear models: Multivariate GLM & MANOVA/MANCOVA. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Trans-action, 5, 28–30.Google Scholar
  24. Greenwald, A. G. (1997). Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist, 52, 1182–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Hampton, S. E., & Reiser, R. A. (2004). Effects of a theory-based feedback and consultation process on instruction and learning in college classrooms. Research in Higher Education, 45, 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, V. E. (2003). Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, A. (2006). Power, privilege, and difference. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Knapp, T. R. (1990). Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: An attempt to resolve the controversy. Nursing Research, 39, 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knol, M. H., Veld, R., Vorst, H. C. M., van Driel, J. H., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2013). Experimental effects of student evaluations coupled with collaborative consultation on college professors’ instructional skills. Research in Higher Education, 54, 825–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Labovitz, S. (1968). Criteria for selecting a significance level: A note on the sacredness of.05. The American Sociologist, 3, 220–222.Google Scholar
  32. Lai, M.K. (1973). The case against tests of statistical significance. Report from the Teacher Education Division Publication Series. Retrieved from
  33. Liu, O. L. (2012). Student evaluation of instruction: In the new paradigm of distance education. Research in Higher Education, 53, 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Marsh, H. W. (2001). Distinguishing between good (useful) and bad workloads on students’ evaluations of teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 183–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 319–383). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, J., & Chamberlin, M. (2000). Women are teachers, men are professors: A study of student perceptions. Teaching Sociology, 28, 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T., & Alexander, A. (2008). Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morris, L. V. (2011). Women in higher education: Access, success, and the future. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 145–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morrison, K., & Johnson, T. (2013). Editorial. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murray, H. G. (2007). Low-inference teaching behaviors and college teaching effectiveness: Recent developments and controversies. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 145–183). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Sullivan, P. D., Hunt, S. K., & Lippert, L. R. (2004). Mediated immediacy: A language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 464–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paludi, M. A., & Strayer, L. A. (1985). What’s in an author’s name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author’s name. Sex Roles, 12, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Perry, R. P., & Smart, J. C. (Eds.). (2007). The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowden, G. V., & Carlson, R. E. (1996). Gender issues and students' perceptions of instructors' immediacy and evaluation of teaching and course. Psychological Reports, 78, 835–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sandler, B. R. (1991). Women faculty at work in the classroom, or, why it still hurts to be a woman in labor. Communication Education, 40, 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sidanius, J., & Crane, M. (1989). Job evaluation and gender: The case of university faculty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simeone, A. (1987). Academic women: Working toward equality. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  51. Skipper, J. K., Guenther, A. C., & Nass, G. (1967). The sacredness of.05: A note concerning the uses of statistical levels of significance in social science. The American Sociologist, 1, 16–18.Google Scholar
  52. Sprague, J., & Massoni, K. (2005). Student evaluations and gendered expectations: What we can't count can hurt us. Sex Roles, 53, 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Statham, A., Richardson, L., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Gender and university teaching: A negotiated difference. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  54. Subramanya, S. R. (2014). Toward a more effective and useful end-of-course evaluation scheme. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 7, 143–157.Google Scholar
  55. Svanum, S., & Aigner, C. (2011). The influences of course effort, mastery and performance goals, grade expectancies, and earned course grades on student ratings of course satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Svinicki, M., & McKeachie, W. J. (2010). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  57. Theall, M., Abrami, P. C., & Mets, L. A. (Eds.). (2001). The student ratings debate: Are they valid? How can we best use them? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  58. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Young, S., Rush, L., & Shaw, D. (2009). Evaluating gender bias in ratings of university instructors' teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3, 1–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lillian MacNell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adam Driscoll
    • 2
  • Andrea N. Hunt
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyRaleighUSA
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin-La CrosseLa CrosseUSA
  3. 3.University of North AlabamaFlorenceUSA

Personalised recommendations