Advertisement

Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 407–421 | Cite as

Preparing Ed.D. Students to Conduct Group Dissertations

  • Tricia Browne-Ferrigno
  • Jane McEldowney Jensen
Article

Abstract

In this article we present an overview of a recently launched cohort-based Ed.D. program that prepares participants to conduct group dissertations. The program, a hybrid model of online learning activities and monthly face-to-face class sessions, is delivered through a partnership between a university’s college of education and the administrative office of a statewide system of community and technical colleges. Discussion begins with a review of the pedagogical rationale that informed program design and instructional practices, followed by a presentation of key program elements tracing the development of the cohort through an innovative, collaborative dissertation process still in progress.

Key words

Doctoral dissertation Companion dissertation Education doctorate Cohort Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED) 

References

  1. Anderson, D. G. (1983). Differentiation of the Ed.D. and Ph.D. in education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, R., & Grogan, M. (2005, Spring). Form should follow function: Removing the Ed.D. dissertation from the Ph.D. straight jacket. UCEA Review, XLVI(2), 10–12. Retrieved from http://www.ucea.org/storage/review/spring2005.pdf
  3. Archbald, D. (2008). Research versus problem solving for the education leadership doctoral thesis: Implications for form and function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 704–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, B. G., Basom, M. R., Yerkes, D. M., & Norris, C. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255–282.Google Scholar
  5. Baxter Magolda, M., & King, P. A. (2004). Learning partnerships: Theory and models of practice to educate for self-authorship. Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  6. Beebe, J. (2001). Rapid Assessment Process: An introduction. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beghetto, R. A., & Alsonzo, J. (2006). Instructional leadership: Supporting the learning process. In S. C. Smith & P. K. Piele (Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for excellence in student learning (4th ed., pp. 284–301). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, S., Blankenship, P., Bolt, W., & Phillips, C. (2009, October). Innovative leadership preparation: What works and why. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Council on Educational Administration, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  9. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, L.D. (1990, April). A perspective on Ph.D.-Ed.D. discussion in schools of education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Muth, R. (2003). Effects of cohorts on learners. Journal of School Leadership, 13(6), 621–643.Google Scholar
  12. Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Muth, R. (2004). On being a cohort leader: Curriculum integration, program coherence, and shared responsibility. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 16, 77–95.Google Scholar
  13. Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Muth, R. (2008). Generative learning communities: Preparing leaders for authentic practice. In R. Papa, C. Achilles, & B. Ashford (Eds.), Leadership on the frontlines: Changes in preparation and practice (pp. 73–86). Sixteenth annual yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Lancaster, PA: Pro>Active.Google Scholar
  14. Burke, L., Jr., Preston, N., Quillen, M., Roe, R., & Strong, E. (2009, October). Stages of group development: From strangers to partners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Council on Educational Administration, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  15. Burnett, P. C. (1999). The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(1), 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Churchill, F. (1996). Collaborative inquiry: The practice of professional development. In Z. Donahue, M. A. Van Tassell, & L. Patterson (Eds.), Research in the classroom: Talk, texts, and inquiry (pp. 108–116). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  17. Cranton, P. A. (2002). Teaching for transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (93), 63–71. Retrieved from ERIC database (EJ642459)Google Scholar
  18. Cross, K. P. (1981). Adults as learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Decker, A., Dykes, M., Gilliam, J., & Marrs, S. (2009, October). Being students again: Balancing ambiguities, expectations, and responsibilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Council on Educational Administration, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  20. Deering, T. E. (1998). Eliminating the doctor of education degree: It’s the right thing to do. Educational Forum, 62(3), 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drath, W. H., & Palus, C. J. (1994). Making common sense: Leadership as meaning-making in a community of practice. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  22. Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar
  23. Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (Eds.). (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Guthrie, J. W. (2009). The case for a modern doctor of education degree (Ed.D.): Multipurpose education doctorates no longer appropriate. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansman, C. A. (2001). Context-based adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (89), 43–51. Retrieved from ERIC database (EJ625874)Google Scholar
  26. Harvard Business School Press. (2006). Leading teams: Expert solutions to everyday challenges [Pocket mentor series]. Boston, MA: Author.Google Scholar
  27. Hlinka, K., Mayo, T., Mobelini, D., Stephenson, L., & Young, A. (2009, October). Being and becoming leaders: Application of learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Council on Educational Administration, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  28. Kegan, R. (1980). Making meaning: The constructive-developmental approach to persons and action. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 58(5), 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knowles, M. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species (4th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  31. McCarthy, M. M., & Forsyth, P. B. (2009). Research and development activities pertaining to the preparation of school leaders. In M. D. Young, G. Crow, J. Murphy, & R. Ogawa (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 85–128). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. McCombs, B. L. (1991). Motivation and lifelong learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(2), 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNamara, J., Lara-Alecio, R., Irby, B., Hoyle, J., & Tong, F. (2007, May 22). Doctoral program issues: Commentary on companion dissertations. Retrieved from the Connexions web site: http://cnx.org/content/m14542/1.1/
  34. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (89), 3–13. Retrieved from ERIC database (EJ625870)Google Scholar
  35. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (74), 5–12. Retrieved from ERIC database (EJ554979)Google Scholar
  36. Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2005). Developing professionally anchored dissertations: Lessons from innovative programs. School Leadership Review, 1(1), 33–57. Retrieved from http://www.tcpea.org/slr/2005/murphy.pdf
  37. Muth, R. (2000). Toward a learning-oriented instructional paradigm: Implications for practice. In P. Jenlink & T. Kowalski (Eds.), Marching into a new millennium: Challenges to educational leadership. Eighth annual yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (pp. 82–103). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  38. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Wong, M. J. (1993). The Ph.D. versus the Ed.D.: Time for a decision. Innovative Higher Education, 18(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perry, J. A. (2011). The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate: Phase II—a quest for change. UCEA Review, 52(3), 1–4.Google Scholar
  40. Rath, T. (2007). StrengthsFinder 2.0. New York, NY: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
  41. Riehl, C., Larson, C. L., Short, P. M., & Reitzug, U. C. (2000). Reconceptualizing research and scholarship in educational administration: Learning to know, knowing to do, doing to learn. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 391–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shulman, L. S. (2010). Doctoral education shouldn’t be a marathon. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(30), B9–B12.Google Scholar
  43. Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Research News and Comment, 35(3), 25–32.Google Scholar
  44. Silver, P. F. (1978). Some areas of concern in administrator preparation. In P. F. Silver & D. W. Spuck (Eds.), Preparatory programs for educational administrators in the United States (pp. 202–215). Columbus, OH: University Council for Educational Administration.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, J., Licklider, B., & Jungst, S. (2003). Learner-centered teaching: Postsecondary strategies that promote “thinking like a professional. Theory into Practice, 42(2), 134–141.Google Scholar
  46. Toma, J.D. (2002, November). Legitimacy, differentiation, and the promise of the Ed.D. in higher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  47. Townsend, B. (2002, November). Rethinking the Ed.D. or what’s in a name? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  48. Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  49. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identify. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). A guide to managing knowledge: Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  51. Witte, J. E., & James, W. B. (1998). Cohort partnerships: A pragmatic approach to doctoral research. New Directors of Adult and Continuing Education, (79), 53–62. Retrieved for ERIC database (EJ571378)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tricia Browne-Ferrigno
    • 1
  • Jane McEldowney Jensen
    • 2
  1. 1.Educational Leadership StudiesUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Educational Policy Studies and EvaluationUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations