Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examining the Relationship between Student Learning and Persistence

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using data from the 2006 cohort of the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education, we examined the relationships between three approaches to measuring student learning outcomes (direct-assessment learning gains, self-reported gains, and college grades) and student persistence from the first to second year. Results from a series of logistic regressions indicated that students’ grade-point averages had the largest explanatory power in student persistence, followed by self-reported gains. Direct-assessment learning gains had the least power in explaining persistence. The findings have implications for the national conversation on student success in college.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: American Council for Education and Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 155–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkner, L., He, S., & Cataldi, E. F. (2002). Descriptive summary of 1995–96 beginning postsecondary students: Six years later. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 2003–151).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. C. (2007). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, N. A. (2009). Can 1st-year college students accurately report their learning and development? American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 466–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (Ed.). (2002). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonyea, R. M., & Miller, A. (2011). Clearing the AIR about the use of self-reported gains in institutional research. In S. Herzog & N. A. Bowman (Eds.), Validity and limitations of college student self-report data. New Directions for Institutional Research, 150 (pp. 99–111). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, M. J. (2011, May-June). American higher education: “First in the world”. Change, 43(3), 7–19.

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE higher education report, 32(5). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, O., Pollio, H. R., & Eison, J. A. (1986). Making sense of college grades. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miville, M., Gelso, C., Pannu, R., Liu, W., Touradji, P., Holloway, P., & Fuertes, J. (1999). Appreciating similarities and valuing differences: The Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(3), 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2005). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris, France: Author.

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from 20 years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C., & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1975). Drop out from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyree, T. (1998). Designing an instrument to measure socially responsible leadership using the social change model of leadership development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland-College Park.

  • Walvoord, B. F., & Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective grading. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolniak, G. C, Mayhew, M. J., & Engberg, M. E. (in press). Learning’s weak link to persistence. Journal of Higher Education.

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Charles Blaich and the Wabash Center of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts for granting access to the data used in this study. The findings reported here reflect only the authors’ analyses and interpretations, and not official positions of the Center of Inquiry or its sponsoring organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shouping Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, S., McCormick, A.C. & Gonyea, R.M. Examining the Relationship between Student Learning and Persistence. Innov High Educ 37, 387–395 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9209-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9209-5

Key words

Navigation