Abstract
Institutional policies and policy systems are vital to the well-being of institutions of higher education. While many institutions dedicate time and resources to the development of key policies, the establishment of a well-designed and well-functioning policy system is often neglected. We refer to the discrepancy between the importance of institutional policy systems and the lack of time and resources devoted to them as the policy paradox. This article chronicles Utah Valley University’s policy improvement initiative as a guide for institutions of higher education interested in improving institutional policy systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The institution became Utah Valley University on July 1, 2008. The research described in this article occurred prior to the change in status, but UVU is used in this article for consistency with the current institutional name.
References
Achtemeier, S. D., & Simpson, R. D. (2005). Practical considerations when using benchmarking for accountability in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 30(2), 117–128.
Alstete, J. W. (1995). Benchmarking in higher education. ASHE-ERIC higher education report No. 5. Washington, DC: The George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
Beckham, J., & Dagley, D. (Eds.). (2005). Contemporary issues in higher education law. Dayton, OH: Education Law Association.
Bender, B. E., & Schuh, J. H. (Eds.). (2002). Using benchmarking to inform practice in higher education. New directions for higher education, 118. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Blobaum, P., Ford, T. M., Hippchen, T., Petersen, R., & Spellacy, P. (2005). ACUPA: Exploring the campus policy process. Retrieved from http://process.umn.edu/acupa/projects/ACUPA_ExploringCampusPolicyProcess.doc
Brown, V. J., & Howell, M. E. (2001). The efficacy of policy statements on plagiarism: Do they change students’ views? Research in Higher Education, 42(1), 103–118.
Bruhn, M., & Petersen, R. (2003). Policy development for information security. In M. Luker & R. Petersen (Eds.), Computer and network security in higher education: EDUCAUSE leadership strategies 8 (pp. 59–71). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dennison, G. M. (2003). Privatization: An unheralded trend in public higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 28(1), 7–20.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McLendon, M. K. (2003). The politics of higher education: Toward an expanded research agenda. Educational Policy, 17(1), 165–191.
Meyer, K. A. (2009). What’s yours is mine: An investigation of current copyright policies of education journals. Innovative Higher Education, 34(1), 3–18.
Mills, M. R. (2007). Stories of politics and policy: Florida’s higher education governance reorganization. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 162–187.
Petersen, R. J. (2004). A framework for IT policy development. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(2), 54–55.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Lynn England, T. Michael Ford, Kathy French, Rodney Petersen, and Jeff Torlina for their valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors were members of the taskforces mentioned in this article. Cameron K. Martin was also the Institutional Policy Administrator.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, S.C., Griffin, R.A. & Martin, C.K. Alleviating the Policy Paradox through Improved Institutional Policy Systems: A Case Study. Innov High Educ 37, 11–26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9182-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9182-z