Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 35, Issue 5, pp 343–358 | Cite as

Students as Consumers of Knowledge: Are They Buying What We’re Selling?

  • Jill A. Singleton-Jackson
  • Dennis L. Jackson
  • Jeff Reinhardt
Article

Abstract

Academic entitlement, an attitude marked by students’ beliefs that they are owed something in the educational experience apart from what they might earn from their effort, has received attention recently in the literature. In previous work, academic entitlement has been shown to be related to parenting styles and personality constructs. The current study departs from previous research by taking a phenomenological approach to understanding academic entitlement. Focus groups were conducted with a total of 52 first-year students. Responses were coded into six facets of academic entitlement: product value of education, social promotion, role of professors, teaching assistants, administrators, and shoppers or scholars.

Key words

academic entitlement student entitlement millennials phenomenology 

References

  1. Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson, S. (2005, October 7). The net generation goes to college [Electronic version]. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52 (7), A34. Retrieved June 6, 2009, from http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i07/07a03401.htm
  4. Ciani, K. D., Summers, J. J., & Easter, M. A. (2008). Gender differences in academic entitlement among college students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(4), 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clay, R. (2008). The corporatization of higher education. Monitor on Psychology, 30(1), 50–54.Google Scholar
  6. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design; Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Feiertag, J., & Berge, Z. L. (2008). Training generation N: How educators should approach the net generation. Education + Training, 50(6), 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Twenge, J. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gamble, J. K. (1999). The Australopithecus afarensis (Lucy) of higher education. Journal of Educational Thought, 33(3), 305–312.Google Scholar
  10. Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  11. Greenberger, E., Lessard, J., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. P. (2008). Self-entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(10), 1193–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoover, E. (2007, March 9). Here’s looking at you, kid: Study says many students are narcissists. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 53.Google Scholar
  13. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2007). Millennials go to college (2nd ed.). Great Falls, VA: LifeCourse Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Lindgren, A., & McDorman, T. L. (1999). Canadian response to the Australopithecus afarensis (Lucy) of higher education. Journal of Educational Thought, 33(3), 313–318.Google Scholar
  15. Lombardi, J.V. (2007, September 26). The academic success entitlement. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved May 10, 2010 from http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/reality_check/the_academic_success_entitlement
  16. Morrow, W. (1994). Entitlement and achievement in education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 13(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murray, H. G. (1997). Effective teaching behaviors in the college classroom. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice (pp. 171–204). Bronx, NY: Agathon.Google Scholar
  18. Partridge, H., & Hallam, G. (2006). Educating the millennial generation for evidence based information practice. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 400–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Redeker, B. (2007, May 18). Meet the new millennials: They’re young, cool and not keen to get to work before 10 A.M. ABC News. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://abcnews.go.com/Business/SpecialSeries/Story?id=3188531&page=1
  21. Reiss, M. (2006, February 23). What happens when everyone’s a winner? The Boston Globe. Retrieved May 10, 2009 from http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/02/23/what_happens_when_everyones_a_winner/?page=1
  22. Rickes, P. C. (2009). Make way for millennials! How today’s students are shaping higher education space. Planning for Higher Education, 37(2), 7–17.Google Scholar
  23. Scott, D. (2009, February-March). University rankings as a marketing tool: Readers beware. Academic Matters, 3–6.Google Scholar
  24. Shaw, S., & Fairhurst, D. (2008). Engaging a new generation of graduates. Education + Training, 50(5), 366–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singleton-Jackson, J., & Newsom, R. (2006). Adapt, adjust, respond: Perspectives on current trends in American colleges and universities. Higher Education Perspectives, 2(11), 192–205.Google Scholar
  26. Stewart, K. (2009). Lessons from teaching millennials. College Teaching, 57(2), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—and more miserable than ever before. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jill A. Singleton-Jackson
    • 1
  • Dennis L. Jackson
    • 1
  • Jeff Reinhardt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations