Interdisciplinary Strategies as Transformative Change in Higher Education

Abstract

Using data collected through case studies of 21 research universities in the United States, I reviewed the efforts institutions are undertaking to meet the growing demand for interdisciplinary knowledge. I adopted the framework of transformative change, where change occurs over time and brings important shifts in the way an institution views itself. Findings indicated that implementing interdisciplinary initiatives is accomplished not only through changes in how institutional work is organized and the facilities in which the work is carried out, but also through concurrent shifts in the institutional culture related to interdisciplinary endeavors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aldrich, H., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altheide, D., Coyle, M., DeVriese, K., & Schneider, C. (2008). Emergent qualitative data analysis. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavey (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 127–154). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bess, J., & Dee, J. (2008). Understanding college and university organization: Theories for effective policy and practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boix Mansilla, V., & Duraising, E. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework. Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 218–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brint, S., Turk-Bicakci, L., Proctor, K., & Murphy, S. (2009a). Expanding the social frame of knowledge: Interdisciplinary, degree-granting fields in American four-year colleges and universities, 1975–2000. Review of Higher Education, 32(2), 155–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brint, S., Turk-Bicakci, L., Proctor, K., Murphy, S., & Hanneman, R. (2009b). The market model and the growth and decline of academic fields in US colleges and universities, 1975–2000. Retrieved July 9, 2009 from http://www.higher-ed2000.ucr.edu/Publications/Brint%20et%20al%20(2009a).pdf

  7. Brodhead, R. (2004, August 19). Richard Brodhead: Welcomes graduate and professional students. Retrieved July 20, 2009, from http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2004/08/brodhead_graduate_0804.html

  8. Brodhead, R. (2006, October 16). Richard Brodhead: Supporting the faculty. Retrieved July 21, 2009 from http://news.duke.edu/2006/10/rhb.html

  9. Campbell, R. (2005, February 20). Like no building you’ve ever seen before. Boston Globe. Retrieved July 17, 2009 from http://senseable.mit.edu/competition/Campbell_Globe.htm

  10. Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duke University. (2000). 2000 campus master plan. Retrieved July 16, 2009 from http://architect.duke.edu/planning/master_plan.html

  12. Duke University. (2006a). Susan Roth to oversee interdisciplinary studies, Sarah Deutsch to lead social sciences at Duke. Retrieved July 17, 2009 from http://news.duke.edu/2006/03/roth_deutsch.html

  13. Duke University. (2006b). Duke and the changing landscape: A planning prologue. Retrieved July 16, 2009 from http://www.provost.duke.edu/StratPlan/pdfs/MADPrologue.pdf

  14. Duke University. (n.d.). Office of the provost: Research. Retrieved July 21, 2009 http://www.provost.duke.edu/units/research.html

  15. Eckel, P., & Kezar, A. (2003). Taking the reins: Institutional transformation in higher education. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gumport, P. (1993). The contested terrain of academic program reduction. Journal of Higher Education, 64(3), 283–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gumport, P., & Snydman, S. (2002). The formal organization of knowledge: An analysis of academic structure. Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 375–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hage, J. (1999). Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual Reviews in Sociology, 25, 597–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris, M., & Holley, K. (2008). Constructing the interdisciplinary ivory tower: The planning of interdisciplinary spaces on university campuses. Planning for Higher Education, 36(3), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harvard University. (2008). Commencement address of President Drew Faust. Retrieved July 17, 2009 from http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/faust/080605_commspeech.php

  21. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Ithaca, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hennessy, J. (2003). Building for the future: Ushering in a new era of collaborative research. Stanford Alumni Magazine. Retrieved July 22, 2009 from http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2003/novdec/columns/prez.html

  23. Hockfield, S. (2006). Campus development for MIT’s future. Retrieved July 20, 2009 from http://web.mit.edu/campus

  24. Holley, K. (2009). Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report series, 35(2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

  25. Keup, J., Astin, A., Lindholm, J., & Walker, A. (2001). Organizational culture and institutional transformation. In A. Astin & H. Astin (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Contexts and processes (pp. 17–40). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kezar, A. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2002). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klein, J. (1990). Interdisciplinarity. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kogan, M. (2000). Transforming higher education: A comparative study. London: Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  30. March, J. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Massachusetts Institute for Technology. (2005, December 2). MIT opens world’s largest neuroscience research center. Retrieved July 16, 2009 from http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2005/bcs-dec2.html

  32. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miller, M., & Boix Mansilla, V. (2004). Thinking across perspectives and disciplines. Paper from the Interdisciplinary Studies Project of Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education. Retrieved July 9, 2009 from http://www.pzweb.harvard.edu/interdisciplinary/pdf/ThinkingAcross.pdf

  35. National Science Foundation. (2004). Interdisciplinary training for undergraduates in biological and mathematical sciences: Program solicitation. Retrieved July 20, 2009 from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04546/nsf04546.htm

  36. Newell, W. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pfirman, S., Collins, J., Lowes, S., & Michaels, A. (2005, February 11). Collaborative efforts: Promoting interdisciplinary scholars. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B15–B16.

  39. Rhoten, D. (2003). A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration. Final report to the National Science Foundation. Retrieved July 20, 2009 from http://www.hybridvigor.net/interdis/pubs/hv_pub_interdis-2003.09.29.pdf

  40. Sa, C. (2008). Interdisciplinary strategies in US research universities. Higher Education, 55(5), 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sample, S. (2006, November 10). Redefining undergraduate education for the 21st century. Retrieved July 17, 2009 from http://www.usc.edu/president/speeches/2006/college_board.html

  42. Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Slaughter, S. (1997). Race, class, gender, and the construction of post-secondary curricula in the United States: Social movement, professionalization, and political economic theories of curricular change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Smith, B., & McCann, J. (eds). (2001). Reinventing ourselves: Interdisciplinary education, collaborative learning, and experimentation in higher education. Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tierney, W. (1988). Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the essentials. Journal of Higher Education, 59(1), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. University of California, Los Angeles. (2008). UCLA re-accreditation by WASC. Retrieved July 15, 2009 from http://www.wasc.ucla.edu/index.shtml

  48. University of Michigan. (2008). Interdisciplinary junior faculty initiative. Retrieved July 15, 2009 from http://www.umich.edu/pres/committees/interdisc.html

  49. University of Minnesota. (n.d.). Interdisciplinary research and education. Retrieved July 15, 2009 from http://www.interdisciplinary.umn.edu/index.html

  50. University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. (2006, May 25). Resolution in support of Carolina North. Retrieved July 17, 2009 from http://www.unc.edu/community/cnorthresolution.htm

  51. University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. (2007). Carolina North holds vast promise. Retrieved July 16, 2009 from http://www.unc.edu/community/chancellors_column_3_07.html

  52. University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. (2008). An introductory discussion of the Carolina North plan. Retrieved July 15, 2009 from http://www.ci.chapel-hill.nc.us/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=2455

  53. University of Pennsylvania. (2002). Agenda for excellence, 1995–2000: A strategic plan for the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved July 17, 2009 from http://www.upenn.edu/almanac/v47pdf/010501/agenda.pdf

  54. University of Pennsylvania. (2006). Penn connects: Campus development plan. Retrieved July 15, 2009 from http://www.upenn.edu/almanac/volumes/v52/n21/pdf_n21/supp.pdf

  55. University of Southern California (n.d.a). About us: Office of the vice provost for research advancement. Retrieved July 10, 2009 from http://www.usc.edu/research/about/vp/

  56. University of Southern California (n.d.b). James H. Zumberge Research and Innovation Fund. Retrieved July 21, 2009 from http://www.usc.edu/research/for_researchers/funding/usc/zumberge/

  57. University of Washington (n.d.). Network of interdisciplinary initiatives. Retrieved July 15, 2009 from http://www.grad.washington.edu/acad/interdisc_network/InterdisNetwork.htm

  58. Walters, A. (2006, May 12). Industry support for academic research falls, but federal aid rises. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A34.

  59. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karri A. Holley.

Additional information

Karri A. Holley

is Assistant Professor of Higher Education at the University of Alabama. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Southern California. Her research interests include interdisciplinarity, graduate education, and qualitative inquiry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holley, K.A. Interdisciplinary Strategies as Transformative Change in Higher Education. Innov High Educ 34, 331 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9121-4

Download citation

Key words

  • interdisciplinarity
  • organizational theory
  • organizational change