Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Abstract

Consistency among the objectives, learning activities, and assessment exercises results in aligned courses, which give students direction and clarity and yield increased learning. However, instructors may not check for course alignment. This article describes a concrete way to determine course alignment by plotting the course components on a table using the cognitive process levels from a revised taxonomy of learning objectives. Once instructors realize that courses are misaligned, they can make adjustments. By giving students experience with varied types of knowledge, which is the other part of this taxonomy, they also learn more. The types of knowledge include factual, conceptual, procedural, and meta-cognitive knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruiskshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Tthe classification of educational goals. Handbook I. Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.

  4. Blumberg, P. (2009). Developing learner-centered teaching: A practical guide for faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experiences and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phyllis Blumberg.

Additional information

Phyllis Blumberg received her A.B. in Psychology from Washington College (MD), her M.A. and Ph.D. both in educational and developmental psychology from the University of Pittsburgh. She is a Professor and Director of the Teaching and Learning Center at the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia. Her research interests include learning-centered teaching, self-directed learning and problem-based learning.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blumberg, P. Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge. Innov High Educ 34, 93–103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9095-2

Download citation

Key words

  • course alignment
  • student learning
  • objectives