Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s Perspective

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The doctoral advisor is said to be one of the most important persons—if not the single most critical person—with whom doctoral students will develop a relationship during their doctoral degree programs (Baird 1995). However, we have limited knowledge regarding how doctoral advisors see their roles and responsibilities as advisors. Therefore, through in-depth interviews, we explored the perceptions of 25 exemplary doctoral advisors, who have graduated a large number of doctoral students, about their roles and responsibilities as advisors. We conclude this article with implications for doctoral education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern, K., & Manathunga, C. (2004). Clutch-starting stalled research students. Innovative Higher Education, 28(4), 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. S., & Swazey, J. P. (1998). Reflection on the graduate student experience: An overview. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration. New Directions for Higher Education, 101 (pp. 3–13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, J. S., & Taylor, E. (2004). Theories and strategies of academic career socialization: Improving paths to the professoriate for Black graduate students. In D. H. Wulff, & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 92–114). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (1994). Understanding and assessing faculty cultures and climates. In M. K. Kinnick (Ed.), Providing useful information for deans and department chairs. New Directions for Institutional Research, 84 (pp. 47–63). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E. (2002, January/February). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 21, 397–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, L. L. (1995). Helping graduate students: A graduate adviser’s view. In A. S. Pruitt-Logan & P. D. Isaac (Eds.), Student services for the changing graduate student population. New Directions for Student Services, 72 (pp. 25–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. J. (2005). Success in graduate school: How exemplary advisors guide their doctoral advisees. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

  • Barnes, B. J., Williams, E. A., & Stassen, M. (2007, April). Who’s getting what? Quality and variation in doctoral students’ advising experiences across disciplines. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Beal, P. E., & Noel, L. (1980). What works in student retention. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program and the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, J. E. (1983). Networking and mentoring: A study of cross-generational experiences of Blacks in graduate and professional school (Research Report). Atlanta, GA: Southern Educational Foundation, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, A. K. (1976). The socialization process in higher education. Washington, DC: The American Association of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R. H. (1978). Mastering medicine. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (2003). The foundations of social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J., & Cooper, D. L. (2001). Assessing advising style: Student perceptions of academic advisors. College Student Affairs Journal, 20(2), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagen, A. P., & Suedkamp Wells, K. M. (2004). The 2000 national doctoral program survey: An on-line study of students’ voices. In D. H. Wulff, & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 74–91). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. (1993). Academic values and faculty rewards. Review of Higher Education, 17(1), 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty work and public trust. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer de Valero, Y. (2001). Departmental factors effecting time-to-degree and completion rates of doctoral students at one land-grant research institution. Journal of Higher Education, 72(3), 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girves, J. E., & Wemmerus, V. (1988). Developing models of graduate student degree progress. Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennen, R. E. (2003). The importance of faculty advising: A CEO and CAO perspective. In G. L. Kramer (Ed.), Faculty advising examined (pp. 40–54). Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration. New directions for higher education, 101 (pp. 55–64). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 199–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (2006). Preparing stewards of the discipline. In C. Golde, & G. Walker (Eds.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the disciplines (pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Retrieved January 31, 2008 from http://www.phd-survey.org

  • Hartnett, R. T., & Katz, J. (1977). The education of graduate students. Journal of Higher Education, 48(6), 646–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. (1993). Being bright is not enough: The unwritten rules of doctoral studies. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, K. T. (1995). Doctoral advisement relationships between women: On friendship and betrayal. Journal of Higher Education, 66(4), 447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinchey, P., & Kimmel, I. (2000). The graduate grind: A critical look at graduate education. New York, NY: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. W. (1998). Mentoring and the faculty development of African-American doctoral students. In H. T. Frierson Jr. (Ed.), Diversity in higher education: Vol. 2. Examining protégé–mentor experiences (pp. 17–40). Stamford, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. B., & Huwe, J. M. (2003). Getting mentored in graduate school. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klomparens, K. L., & Beck, J. P. (2004). Michigan State University’s conflict resolution program: Setting expectations and resolving conflicts. In D. H. Wulff, & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future Faculty (pp. 250–264). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovitts, B. E. (2004). Research on the structure and process of graduate education: Retaining students. In D. H. Wulff, & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 115–136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A., & Toney, M. (2000). Academic advising: View of the givers ad takers. Journal of College Student Retention, 2(2), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna, G., & Cullen, D. L. (1998). Do graduate students need mentoring? College Student Journal, 23(3), 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, W., Scroggins, D., & Rule, P. B. (1990). The mentor in graduate education. Studies in Higher Education, 15(3), 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M. A., Ford, M. E., & Thompson, C. M. (2004). Degree process of women doctoral students: Factors that constrain, facilitate, and differentiate. The Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 385–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLure, J. E. B. (1989). Recommendations for faculty advising. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University, College of Education, Georgia, USA. Retrieved July 22, 2008 from Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. (Publication No. AAT 8922915).

  • Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B., & Dey, E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 454–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor, J. (2003). For better or worse: Improving advising relationships between faculty and graduate students. In A. L. Green, & L. V. Scott (Eds.), Journey to the Ph.D. How to navigate the process as African Americans (pp. 239–253). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. D., Manning, L., Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Sprague, J., Fraser, P. K., et al. (1999, May/June). On the road to becoming a professor. Change, 31(3), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, J. D., & Woodford, B. J. (2000). Re-envisioning the Ph.D. What concerns do we have? Retrieved July 22, 2008 from http://www.grad.washington.edu/envision/project_resources/concerns.html

  • O’Bara, C. C. (1993). Why some finish and why some don’t: Factors affecting PhD completion. Ph.D. dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University, California, United States. Retrieved July 22, 2008 from Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. (Publication No. AAT 9330356).

  • Peters, R. L. (1992). Getting what you came for: The smart guide to earning a M.A. or Ph.D. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petress, K. C. (1996). The multiple roles of an undergraduate’s academic advisor. Education, 117(1), 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, C. J., Sprokkereef, A., Burgess, R. G., & Lakin, E. (1997). Supervision of doctoral students in the natural sciences: Expectations and experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seagram, B., Gould, J., & Pyke, S. W. (1998). An investigation of gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degrees. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. S. V., & Thompson, J. R. (1993). Socializing women doctoral students: Minority and majority experiences. Review of Higher Education, 16(3), 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twale, D., & Kochan, F. (1999). Restructuring an educational leadership program: The teacup adventure. International Studies in Educational Administration, 27(1), 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valadez, J. R. (1998). The social dynamic of mentoring in graduate education: A case study of African American students and their graduate advisors. In H. T. Frierson Jr. (Ed.), Diversity in higher education: Vol. 2. Examining protégé–mentor experiences (pp. 129–140). Stamford, CT: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilkinas, T. (2008). An exploratory study of the supervision of Ph.D./research students’ theses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(5), 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldeck, J. H., Orrego, V. O., Plax, G. T., & Kearney, P. (1997). Graduate student/Faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end. Communication Quarterly, 45(3), 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage?. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willie, C. V., Grady, M. K., & Hope, R. O. (1991). African-Americans and the doctoral experience: Implications for policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, R. B., & Polkosnik, M. C. (1984). Advising in graduate and professional school. In R. B. Winston Jr., T. K. Miller, S. C. Ender, & T. J. Crites (Eds.), Developmental academic advising (pp. 287–316). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Nyquist, J. D., & Sprague, J. (2004). The development of graduate students as teaching scholars: A four-year longitudinal study. In D. H. Wulff, & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 46–73). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, D. (2002). The engagement model for effective academic advising with undergraduate college students and student organizations. Journal of Humanistic Counseling Education and Development, 41(1), 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational Policy, Research, and Administration, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 111 Infirmary Way, Office 2, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA

    Benita J. Barnes

  2. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    Ann E. Austin

Authors
  1. Benita J. Barnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann E. Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benita J. Barnes.

Additional information

Benita J. Barnes

received her Ph.D. in Higher, Adult, and Lifelong Education from Michigan State University and is currently Assistant Professor of Higher Education Administration at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Her research interests include doctoral education, the millennial generation, and identity development. She can be reached at barnesbj@educ.umass.edu.

Ann E. Austin

received her Ph.D. in higher education from the University of Michigan and currently holds the Mildred B. Erickson Distinguished Chair in the Higher, Adult, and Lifelong Education Program at Michigan State University. Her research interests include graduate education, teaching and learning, organizational change, and faculty development. She can be reached at aaustin@msu.edu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnes, B.J., Austin, A.E. The Role of Doctoral Advisors: A Look at Advising from the Advisor’s Perspective. Innov High Educ 33, 297–315 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x

Key words

Search

Navigation