Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Successful Inter-institutional Resource Sharing in a Niche Educational Market: Formal Collaboration Without a Contract

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Funded by an Institute for Museum and Library Services National Leadership grant, five universities developed a system to provide archives education courses—a niche curriculum—to each other. They use compressed video over Internet 2 in a resource-sharing collaboration across five states and two time zones. The original grant ran from 2002–2005, during which time the collaborative offered eight courses to 140 students. Between 2006 and 2008, it offered eleven courses to 177 students. This article details the administrative model, based solely on school- and department-level agreements, which have enabled this resource-sharing collaborative to thrive after grant support ceased. While developed for archives education programs, the model could enhance any niche curriculum program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cardenas, K. H. (1998). Saving small foreign language programs: Is cooperation the answer? ADFL Bulletin, 29(3), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care, W. D., & Scanlan, J. M. (2001). Planning and managing the development of courses for distance delivery: Results from a qualitative study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/summer42/care42.html

  • Carliner, S. (2001). Administering distance courses taught in partnership with other institutions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/summer42/carliner42.html

  • Dirr, P. J. (2003). Distance education policy issues: Towards 2010. In M.G. Moore, & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 461–479). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotolo, L. (2002). Cooperation and alliances: Higher education and the use of television. In L. G. Dotolo, & J. B. Noftsinger (Eds.), Leveraging resources through partnerships (pp. 99–106). New directions for higher education, Vol. 120. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feasley, D. E. (2003). Evolution of national and regional organizations. In M. G. Moore, & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 37–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannoni, D. L., & Tesone, D. V. (2003). What academic administrators should know to attract senior level faculty members to online learning environments. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/spring61/giannoni61.htm

  • Great Plains Interactive Distance Education Alliance (Great Plains IDEA). (2004). Faculty Handbook. Community development: An inter-institutional masters degree program. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.ag.iastate.edu/centers/rdev/projects/distdegree/workbook/tab4-programmaterials.pdf

  • Hanna, D. E. (2003). Organizational models in higher education, past and future. In M. G. Moore, & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 67–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, A. (1994). Distance education and niche markets in conventional education. Open Learning, 9(1), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, A., & Guiton, P. (2006). Strategies for stainable open and distance learning. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (2001). Managing the changing nature of distance and open education at institutional level. Open Learning, 16(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangan, M. (2001). Professional schools seek degrees of cooperation. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(3), A14–A15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulus, L. S., Price, W. J., & Tracey, J. C. (2003). An inter-institutional partnership for a doctoral program in an era of financial restraint. Ypsilanti, Michigan: Cooperative Doctoral Program, Eastern Michigan University and Grand Valley State University (Michigan). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 481782. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from the ERIC database.

  • McRae, K. (1997). Walking the tightrope of collaboration: The challenges. Calgary (Alberta), Canada: Calgary Conjoint Nursing Program, University of Calgary. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED407030. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from the ERIC database.

  • Open University. (2008). Home Page. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.open.ac.uk

  • Perraton, H. (1991). Administrative structures for distance education. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L. (2002). Assessing a consortium’s effectiveness. In L. G. Dotolo, & J. B. Noftsinger (Eds.), Leveraging resources through partnership (pp. 107–114). New directions in higher education, Vol. 120. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B. (2001). Services and technology: Revolutionizing higher education. Educause, 36(4), 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAEC. (2005). Guiding principles. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.archiveseducation.info/principles.html

  • SAEC. (2008). Current and proposed classes. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.archiveseducation.info/current_proposed.html

  • Simonsen, M., & Bauck, T. (2003). Distance education policy issues: Statewide perspectives. In M. G. Moore, & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 417–424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, J., & Gamroth, L. (2002). Scholarship revisited: A collaborative nursing education program’s journey. Journal of Nursing Education, 41, 524–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thach, L., & Murphy, K. L. (1994). Collaboration in distance education: From local to international perspectives. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Graduate School of Library and Information Science. Online Education (LEEP). (2008). Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.lis.uiuc.edu/programs/leep/index.html

  • University of Phoenix. Axia College. (2008). Home Page. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from https://axiaecampus.phoenix.edu

  • University of South Carolina. School of Library and Information Science. (2008). Distance Education Home Page. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.libsci.sc.edu/de/index.htm

  • Wilson, G. G., Abel, F. J., Patrick, M., & Rouscelp, E. (1994). A three college collaborative teacher preparation program. ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED 367 595. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from the ERIC database.

  • World Wide Web Consortium. (2008). Member agreement. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://www.w3.org/2005/03/Member-Agreement

  • Zlatic, T. D., Nowak, D. M., & Sylvester, D. (2000). Integrating general and professional education through a study of herbal products: An intercollegiate collaboration. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth H. Dow.

Additional information

Elizabeth H. Dow holds an M.A. in history from the University of Vermont and a Ph.D. in Library Science from the University of Pittsburgh. She teaches the archives track in the School of Library and Information Science at Louisiana State University and specializes in description of archival materials and intellectual access to electronically published historical documents.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dow, E.H. Successful Inter-institutional Resource Sharing in a Niche Educational Market: Formal Collaboration Without a Contract. Innov High Educ 33, 169–179 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9076-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9076-x

Key words

Navigation