Scholars in teaching and learning value student research and program assessment as strategies to promote excellence in undergraduate education. Yet, in practice, each can be complex and difficult to sustain. This case study demonstrates how undergraduate research, mentoring of junior faculty, and assessment can be integrated in ways that enrich the educational experiences of students and the professional development of faculty and improve research on teaching and learning. The authors describe a lively undergraduate research project that became tied to the mentoring of assistant professors and then to program assessment. We conclude with recommendations for implementing such a project in other academic settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Balcazar, F. E., Taylor, R. E., Kielhofner, G. W., Tamley, K., Benziger, T., Carlin, N., et al. (2004). Participatory action research: General principles and a study with a chronic health condition. In L. A. Jason, C. B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balaczar, R. R. Taylor, & M. I. Davis (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 17-36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13–25.
Bode, R. K. (1999). Mentoring and collegiality. In R. J. Menges (Ed.), Faculty in new jobs: A guide to settling in, becoming established, and building institutional support (pp. 118–144). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, S. S. Kenny (chair) (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.
Boyer, E. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Outreach, 1(1), 11–20.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Boyle, P., & Boice, B. (1998). Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 22, 157–179.
Dotterer, R. L. (2002). Student–faculty collaborations, undergraduate research, and collaboration as an administrative model. In K. J. Zahorski (Ed.), Scholarship in the postmodern era: New venues, new values, new visions. New directions for teaching and learning (vol. 90, pp. 81–89). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ewell, P. T. (2002). An emerging scholarship: A brief history of assessment. In T. Banta (Ed.), Building a scholarship of assessment (pp. 3–25). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
Field, M., & Stowe, D. (2002). Transforming interdisciplinary teaching and learning through assessment. In C. Haynes (Ed.), Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching (pp. 256–274). Westport, CT: Oryx.
Gelmon, S., & Agre-Kippenhan, S. (2002). Promotion, tenure, and the engaged scholar: Keeping the scholarship of engagement in the process. AAHE Bulletin, 7–11. Retrieved March 27, 2006 from http://www.artsci.utk.edu/outreach/pdfs/Promotion,Tenure,%20Engaged%20Scholar.pdf.
Gillespie, D., Dolšak, N., Kochis, B., Krabill, R., Lerum, K., Peterson, A., et al. (2005). Research circles: Supporting the scholarship of junior faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 30, 149–162.
Gillespie, D., Roos, J., & Slaughter, C. (2006a). Undergraduates’ ambivalence about leadership in small groups. The Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 17(3), 33–49.
Gillespie, D. Rosamond, S., & Thomas, E. (2006b). Grouped out?: Undergraduate default strategies for participating in multiple small groups. The Journal of General Education, 55, 81–102.
Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman, S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 614–631.
Hillyard, C., Gillespie, D., & Littig, P. (2007). University students’ attitudes toward small groups: The effects of frequent participation (Manuscript in preparation).
Kauffman, L., & Stocks, J. (Eds.). (2004). Reinvigorating the undergraduate experience. Retrieved July 2006 from the Council on Undergraduate Research Web site at http://www.cur.org/publications/aire_raire/toc.asp.
Kinkead, J. (2003). Learning through inquiry: An overview of undergraduate research. In J. Kinkead (Ed.), Valuing and supporting undergraduate research (pp. 5–18). New directions for teaching and learning, vol. 93. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Klein, J. T. (1999). Mapping interdisciplinary studies. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Malachowski, M. R. (2003). A research across the curriculum movement. In J. Kinkead (Ed.), Valuing and supporting undergraduate research (pp. 55–68). New directions for teaching and learning, vol. 93. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
National Science Foundation (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. National Science Foundation publication no. 96–139. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sorcinelli, M. D. (1992). New and junior faculty stress: Research and responses. In M. D. Sorcinelli & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Developing new and junior faculty (pp. 27–37). New directions for teaching and learning, vol. 50. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. E. (Eds.) (1992). Developing new and junior faculty. New directions for teaching and learning. vol. 50. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Vogelgesang, L. J., & O’Byrne, K. (2003). Undergraduate research as community service. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 7(2), 146–150.
Walvoord, B. E. (2004). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wilson, R. (2001). A higher bar for earning tenure. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved October 3, 2003, from the University of Washington Library Website at http://nersp.nerdc.ufl.edu/~lombardi/edudocs/wilson_chron_2001.html, January 5.
Yogan, L. J., & Mercer-Taylor, B. (2000, May). Developing faculty as stakeholders in assessment: A case study. Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH.
Elizabeth Thomas is Assistant Professor in the Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at the University of Washington Bothell. She received her Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and teaches courses on inquiry in the social sciences, community psychology, and psychology and the arts. Her research examines sociocultural contexts for learning and development with a particular focus on the role of the arts and the potential of participatory action research strategies.
Diane Gillespie is Professor and Associate Director of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences (IAS) at The University of Washington, Bothell, received her Ph.D. at the University of Nebraska—Lincoln in Cultural and Psychological Studies in Education. She teaches multicultural social science courses and qualitative research. Her recent publications explore the importance of narrative for reflective teaching and learning, learning in small groups, and the role of human rights in nonformal education.
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, E., Gillespie, D. Weaving Together Undergraduate Research, Mentoring of Junior Faculty, and Assessment: The Case of an Interdisciplinary Program. Innov High Educ 33, 29–38 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-007-9060-x
- undergraduate research
- program assessment
- faculty mentoring