Abstract
While there has been emphasis on the institution and individual classroom as loci of learning and reform, less attention has been paid to the academic department. However, precisely because its structure is so endemic to institutions of higher education, the academic department may be the most logical and potent site for change. Using a case study approach, this paper examines the conditions under which change in undergraduate education takes hold and flourishes in the academic department, advances the concept of readiness, and explores its implications for those who wish to promote change in the department.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, R. G. (Ed.) (1985). Incentives for faculty vitality. New directions for higher education, 51. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Baldwin, R. G., & Krotseng, M. V. (1985). Incentives in the academy: Issues and options. In R. G. Baldwin (Ed.), Incentives for faculty vitality. New Directions for Higher Education, 51 (pp. 5–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12–25 (November/December).
Bergquist, W. H. (1992). The four cultures of the academy: Insights and strategies for improving leadership in collegiate organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 195–203.
Biglan, A. (1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 204–213.
Bok, D. (2005, December 16). The critical role of trustees in enhancing student learning. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i17/17b01201.htm
Doherty, A., Riordan, T., & Roth, J. (Eds.) (2002). Student learning: A central focus for institutions of higher education: A report and collection of institutional practices of the student learning initiative. Milwaukee, WI: Alverno Institute.
Donald, J. G. (1983). Knowledge structures: Methods for exploring course content. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 31–41.
Donald, J. G. (1995). Disciplines with an affinity for the improvement of undergraduate education. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich (Eds.), Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Vol. 64, pp. 7–17). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Donald, J. G. (2002). Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hagner, P. R. (2004). Engaging faculty in new forms of teaching and learning. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 15(6). Nederland, CO: POD Network in Higher Education.
Hyman, M., & Luginbuhl, G. (2004). Inquiry-guided learning and the undergraduate major in the department of microbiology. In V. S. Lee (Ed.), Teaching and learning through inquiry: A guidebook for institutions and instructors (pp. 129–142). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Lee, V. S. (2002). Proceedings from the institute on inquiry-guided learning. Raleigh, NC: Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning, North Carolina State University.
Lee, V. S. (Ed.) (2004). Teaching and learning through inquiry: A guidebook for institutions and instructors. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Lucas, A. F., & Associates (2000). Leading academic change: Essential roles for department chairs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Marcy, M. B. (2003, July 25). Why foundations have cut back in higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B16.
Murray, H. G., & Renaud, R. D. (1995). Disciplinary differences in classroom teaching behaviors. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich (Eds.), Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice (pp. 31–40). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science: Why some things work and most don’t. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
Trow, M. (1976). The American academic department as a context for learning. Studies in Higher Education, 1(1), 11–22.
Volkwein, C. (1991, November). Study of research and teaching orientations in twenty-seven academic departments. Paper presented at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Boston, MA.
Walvoord, B., Carey, A. K., Smith, H. L., Soled, S. W., Way, P. K., & Zorn, D. (2000). Academic departments: How they work, how they change. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27(8). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wergin, J. F. (2003). Departments that work: Building and sustaining cultures of excellence in academic programs. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Winteler, A. (1981). The academic department as environment for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 10(1), 25–36.
Zemsky, R. (Ed.) (1991). Policy perspectives. Pew higher education research project (p. 5A) (November).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Virginia S. Lee
is managing member and consultant, Virginia S. Lee & Associates, LLC, a consulting firm specializing in teaching, learning, and assessment in higher education. She received her B.A. from Smith College, her M.B.A. from New York University, and her Ph.D. from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Special interests include the design and implementation of institution-wide curriculum reform efforts, course and curriculum design, inquiry-guided learning, intensive learning, outcomes-based assessment, and the scholarship of teaching and learning.
Michael R. Hyman
is Director of Graduate Programs and Associate Professor in the Department of Microbiology at North Carolina State University. He received his B.S. from University College, London, his M.B.A. from Oregon State University, and his Ph.D. from Bristol University. His major research interest is the biodegradation of environmental pollutants.
Geraldine Luginbuhl
is Interim Department Head and Professor in the Department of Microbiology at North Carolina State University. She received her B.S. from Stanford University and her Ph.D. from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She has a longstanding interest in undergraduate education and, recently, inquiry-guided learning.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, V.S., Hyman, M.R. & Luginbuhl, G. The Concept of Readiness in the Academic Department: A Case Study of Undergraduate Education Reform. Innov High Educ 32, 3–18 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9032-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9032-6