Abstract
Our 5-year experiment with teaching and evaluating an inquiry course has led us to conclude that inquiry is a potent pedagogical tool in higher education, encouraging students to become self-directed and engaged learners. This article offers key ingredients and procedures for designing an inquiry-based course. It provides a pragmatic model of inquiry that describes the structure and function of such a course and the goals and learning objectives for students. This model of inquiry is widely applicable and will help faculty members from a variety of disciplines develop an innovative way of engaging and teaching students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdal-Haqq, I. (1998). Constructivism in teacher education: Considerations for those who would link practice to theory. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED426986) Retrieved February 20, 2006, from ERIC database: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED426986.
Alford, R. (1998). The craft of inquiry: Theories, methods and evidence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Boyer Commission (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: Carnegie Foundation.
Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 3–17.
Budnitz, N. (2000). What do we mean by inquiry? Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://www.biology.duke.edu/cibl/inquiry/what_is_inquiry.htm.
Cuneo, C., Inglis, S., Justice, C., Lee, B., Miller, S., Rice, J., et al. (2000). Turning the page: Student learning through a collaboratively taught social sciences inquiry course. Paper presented at 5th Annual EvNet Conference. ON, Canada: Cornwall (June).
Evans, D. (1994). Socialization into deafness. In M. L. Deitz, R. Prus, & W. Shaffir (Eds.), Doing everyday life: Ethnography as human lived experience (pp. 129–142). Mississauga, ON, Canada: Copp Clark Longham.
Hare, W. (2000). Teaching and the barricades to inquiry. Journal of General Education, 49, 88–109.
Hebrank, M. (2000). Why inquiry-based teaching and learning in the middle school science classroom? Retrieved February 15, 2005, from http://www.biology.duke.edu/cibl/inquiry/why_inquiry_in_ms.doc.
Hubbuch, S. M. (1996). Writing research papers across the curriculum (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Hudspith, B., & Jenkins, H. (2001). Teaching the art of inquiry (Green Guide #3). Halifax, NS, Canada: Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
Inglis, S., Sammon, S., Justice, C., Cuneo, C., Miller, S., Quirke, L., et al. (2004). BaFa BaFa as a cross-cultural simulation to advance student inquiry. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal of Theory, Practice and Research, 35, 476–487.
Justice, C., Laurie, I., Rice, J., & Warry W. (in press). Does teaching inquiry make a difference? A comparative analysis of student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education.
Justice, C., Warry, W., Cuneo, C., Inglis, S., Miller, S., Rice, J., et al. (2002). A grammar for inquiry: Linking goals and methods in a collaboratively taught social sciences inquiry course. In Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (Ed.), The Alan Blizzard award paper: The award winning papers. Windsor, ON, Canada: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Knapper, C. K., & Cropley, A. J. (1999). Lifelong learning in higher education (3rd ed.). London, England: Kogan Page.
Lee, V., Greene, D., Odom, J., Schechter, E., & Slatta, R. W. (2004). What is inquiry guided learning? In V. S. Lee (Ed.), Teaching and learning through inquiry: A guidebook for institutions and instructors (pp. 3–16). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Olson, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Shirts, G. (1977). BaFa’ BaFa’: A cross cultural simulation. Del Mar, CA: Simile II.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge McMaster University reference librarians Nora Gaskin and Olga Perkovic for their creative input and work in designing and conducting the library training sessions described in this article. We thank Dale Roy, Bob Hudspith, and Chris Knapper for their suggestions and critical feedback on this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Christopher Justice, Ph.D., is an anthropologist and health social scientist, and is an associate of the Centre for Leadership in Learning.
e-mail: justice@mcmaster.ca
James Rice, Ph.D., is Professor Emeritus in the School of Social Work.
e-mail: ricejame@mcmaster.ca
Wayne Warry, Ph.D., is Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology. His interests include aboriginal issues, aboriginal health and health systems evaluation, and educational research.
e-mail: warrywa@mcmaster.ca
Sue Inglis, Ph.D., is Professor in the Department of Kinesiology. Her interests include organizational behaviour and student inquiry.
e-mail: ingliss@mcmaster.ca
Stefania Miller, Ph.D., is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science. Her interests include international human rights and democratization in post-communist systems.
e-mail: millers@mcmaster.ca
Sheila Sammon, M.A., is Associate Professor, School of Social Work. Her interests include social work education and the integration of theory and practice.
e-mail: sammon@mcmaster.ca
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W. et al. Inquiry in Higher Education: Reflections and Directions on Course Design and Teaching Methods. Innov High Educ 31, 201–214 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9021-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9021-9