Skip to main content

Flexible Learning Environments: Leveraging the Affordances of Flexible Delivery and Flexible Learning

Innovative Higher Education volume 31, pages 187–197 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the key features of flexible learning environments (FLEs). Key principles associated with FLEs are explained. Underlying tenets and support mechanisms necessary for the implementation of FLEs are described. Similarities and differences in traditional learning and FLEs are explored. Finally, strategies and techniques for becoming a successful learner and facilitator in FLEs are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • American Distance Education Consortium (2002). ADEC guiding principles for distance teaching and learning. Available online: http://www.adec.edu/admin/papers/distance-teaching_principles.html.

  • Anton, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher–learner interaction in the second-language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 303–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, E. W., Anakwe, U. P., & Kessler, E. H. (2001). Receptivity to distance learning: The effect of technology, reputation, constraints, and learning preferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London, England: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T. M., Lowyck, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Designing environments for constructive learning. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. (1999). From dual-mode to flexible delivery: Paradoxical transitions in Australian (open and distance education). Performance Improvement Quarterly, 12, 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M. M., & Hill, J. R. (2006). Weighing the risks with the rewards: Implementing student-centered pedagogy within high-stakes testing. In R. Lambert & C. McCarthy (Eds.), Understanding teacher stress in an age of accountability (pp. 19–42). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology, 34, 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., & Land, S. M. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues and implication. Contemporary Education, 68, 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. R. (2002). Strategies and techniques for community building in Web-based learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J. (1998). Democracy and computer conferencing. Theory into Practice, 37(1), 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeroff, G. I. (2003). A classroom of one: How online learning is changing our schools and colleges. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. G., & Anderson, W. G. (2004). Handbook of distance education. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolova, I., & Collis, B. (1998). Flexible learning and design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, T., George, R., & McCausland, H. (2000). Rethinking the ways in which teaching and learning are supported: The Flexible Learning Centre at the University of South Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2002). Teaching and learning online: A beginner's guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. Mt. Lawley, Western Australia, Australia: Centre for Research in Information Technology and Communications, Edith Cowan University.

  • Osciak, S. Y., & Milheim, W. D. (2001). Multiple intelligences and the design of Web-based instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28, 355–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owston, R. (2000). Evaluating Web-based learning environments: Strategies and insights. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace : Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pataray-Ching, J., & Kavanaugh-Anderson, D. (1999, Fall). Supporting learner-generated inquiries. The Educational Forum, 64(1), 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations.New York, NY: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P. R.-J. (1993). Constructive learning: The role of the learner. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 291–313). Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. J. (2000). Flexible delivery and apprentice training: Preferences, problems and challenges. Journal of Vocational Education & Training: The Vocational Aspect of Education, 52, 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. J. (2001). Technology, student learning preferences, and the design of flexible learning programs. Instructional Science, 29, 237–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, C. (2000). High-tech heretic: Reflections of a computer contrarian. Norwell, MA: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. C. (1998). Flexible delivery: The globalisation of lifelong learning. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 7, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Wisconsin Extension Services (2002). Distance education clearinghouse. Available online: http://www.uwex.edu/disted/home.html.

  • White, K. W., & Weight, B. H. (2000). The online teaching guide: A handbook of attitudes, strategies and techniques for the virtual classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, G. (2005). Satisfaction, academic rigor and interaction: Perceptions of online instruction. Education, 125, 460–468.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

    Janette R. Hill

Authors
  1. Janette R. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janette R. Hill.

Additional information

Janette Hill

is an Associate Professor in the Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology at The University of Georgia, Athens. She received her Ph.D. from The Florida State University in Instructional Systems. Dr. Hill's research focuses on online learning with adults, specifically exploring issues related to building community and connections with others in virtual environments. Dr. Hill can be reached at janette@uga.edu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, J.R. Flexible Learning Environments: Leveraging the Affordances of Flexible Delivery and Flexible Learning. Innov High Educ 31, 187–197 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9016-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9016-6

Key words

  • flexible learning
  • online learning