Innovative Higher Education

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 63–79 | Cite as

Mentoring of Women Faculty: The Role of Organizational Politics and Culture



This article reports on a key finding of a phenomenological study on the mentoring experiences of women faculty. The study revealed the political climate of the organization as an essential attribute of this experience. Women faculty identified organizational culture and gender issues that affected the mentoring they received. This study suggests the need for human resource and organization development initiatives to facilitate the provision of academic mentoring for women faculty—individually, departmentally, and culturally—as a means to foster transformation and change in academic institutions.


mentoring women faculty organizational culture gender organization development 


  1. A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. (1999). MIT Faculty Newsletter, XI(4), 1–12. Retrieved April 30, 2000, from women/women.htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. Aisenberg, N., & Harrington, M. (1988). Women of academe: Outsiders in the sacred grove. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  3. Angelique, H., Kyle, K., & Taylor, E. (2002). Mentors and muses: New strategies for academic success. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley. R. J., & Blackburn, R. T. (1992). Two decades of gain for female faculty? Teachers College Record, 93, 697–709.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, M. (1995). Multiple roles of the mentor supporting women's adult development. In K. Taylor & C. Marienau (Eds.), Learning environments for women's adult development: Bridges toward change (Vol. 65, pp. 63–72). New directions for adult and continuing education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Boyce, M. E. (2003). Organizational learning is essential to achieving and sustaining change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 28, 119– 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyle, P., & Boice, B. (1998). Systematic mentoring for new faculty teachers and graduate teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 22, 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan, M. (2000). Mentoring tenured women chemists. Chemical and Engineering News, 78(36), 46–47.Google Scholar
  9. Buck, J. M., & Watson, J. L. (2002). Retaining staff employees: The relationship between human resource management strategies and organizational commitment. Innovative Higher Education, 26, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2005). Organization development and change (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Dahlberg, K., & Drew, N. (1997). A lifeworld paradigm for nursing research. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 15, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerdes, E. P. (2003). Do it your way: Advice from senior academic women. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson, S. K. (2004). Being mentored: The experience of women faculty. Journal of Career Development, 30, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, S. K., & Hanes, L. A. (2003). The contribution of phenomenology to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review, 2, 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Glazer-Raymo, J. (1999). Shattering the myths: Women in academe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hamrick, F. A. (1998, April). “I have work to do”: Affirmation and marginalization of women full professors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 420 251)Google Scholar
  18. Hensel, N. (1991). Realizing gender equality in higher education: The need to integrate work/family issues. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 2). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  19. Hopkins, N. (1999, June 11). MIT and gender bias: Following up on victory. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(40), B4–B5.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, W. K., & Simpson, R. D. (1994). Mentoring new faculty for teaching and research. In M. A. Wunsch (Ed.), Mentoring revisited: Making an impact on individuals and institutions, New directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 57, pp. 65–72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Johnsrud, L. K. (1991). Mentoring between academic women: The capacity for interdependence. Initiatives, 54(3), 7–17.Google Scholar
  22. Latta, G. F. (2005, February). “First break all the rules” of the Academy: Adapting Gallup's corporate tools of engagement for higher education. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development Research Conference, Estes Park, CO.Google Scholar
  23. McDonald, K. S., & Hite, L. M. (1998). Human resource development's role in women's career progress. In L. L. Bierema (Ed.), Women's career development across the lifespan: Insights and strategies for women, organizations, and adult educators. New directions for adult and continuing education (Vol. 80, pp. 53–62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Rabasca, L. (2000). In search of equity. Monitor on Psychology, 10, 1–3. Retrieved August 16, 2004, from Scholar
  25. Rios, A., & Longnion, J. (2000). Agenda for the 21st century: Executive summary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Initiative for Women in Higher Education. Retrieved September 7, 2000, from Scholar
  26. Ruona, W. E. A., & Gibson, S. K. (2004). The making of 21st century HR: An analysis of the convergence of HRM, HRD, and OD. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, J. W., Smith, W. J., & Markham, S. E. (2000). Diversity issues in mentoring academic faculty. Journal of Career Development, 26, 251–262.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, J. O., Whitman, J. S., Grant, P.A., Stanutz, A., Russett, J. A., & Rankin, K. (2001). Peer networking as a dynamic approach to supporting new faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 25, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Social change requires academic women's leadership. (2000, June). Women in Higher Education, 9(6), 1–2.Google Scholar
  30. Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  31. Torraco, R. J., Hoover, R. E., & Knippelmeyer, S. A. (2005). Organization development and change in universities. In M. L. Morris & F. M. Nafukho (Eds.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development Research Conference (pp. 858–865). Bowling Green, OH: AHRD.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). The gender and racial/ethnic composition of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff, 1992–98 (NCES2002–160), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience (2nd ed.). London: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wanberg, C. R., Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 22, pp. 39–124). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  35. Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139–145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St. ThomasMinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations