Skip to main content
Log in

Options for Change: A Flexible Vehicle for Curriculum Evolution and Reform

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we examine a flexible curricular approach known as the “Option.” The Option enables students to supplement traditional majors with a coherent set of courses and other educational experiences in a related, often interdisciplinary field. Options can act as curricular bridges between mainstream academic fields and problems of professional practice. They can also give students experience with emerging subject areas (e.g., biomedical engineering). Options serve as laboratories for experimenting with new subject areas before incorporating them fully into the curriculum as majors and minors. Hence, Options promote creativity and risk-taking by providing a proving ground for potential new academic programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of American Colleges, Project on liberal learning, study-in-depth, and the arts and sciences major (1991). The challenge of connecting learning. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. M. (1998). The shaping of American higher education: Emergence and growth of the contemporary system. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaff, J. G., & Ratcliff, J. L. (1996). Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskin, A. E. (1997). Restructuring to enhance student learning (and reduce costs). Liberal Education, 83(2), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (1978). Handbook on undergraduate curriculum. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (1989). Undergraduate curriculum 2000. In C. H. Pazandak (Vol. Ed.), Improving undergraduate education in large universities (pp. 77–84). New Directions for Higher Education, Vol. 66. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Levine, A. (1990). Curriculi-Curricula. Change, 22(2), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A. (2001). The remaking of the American university. Innovative Higher Education, 25, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcy, M., & Guskin, A. (2003). Project on the future of higher education: Teaching and learning in a climate of restricted resources. Liberal Education, 89(2), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Registrar’s Office. (2002). Academic program terminology. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, J. S., & Lattuca, L. R. (1997). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in action. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingspread Group on Higher Education. (1993). An American imperative: Higher expectations for higher education. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation and others.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, W. A., & Fisher, G. M. C. (2002). A makeover for engineering education. Issues in Science and Technology, 18(3), 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, R., & Massy, W. F. (1995). Toward an understanding of our current predicaments: Expanding perimeters, melting cores, and sticky functions. Change, 27(6), 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Roger G. Baldwin received his doctorate in higher education from the University of Michigan. He is currently Professor of Higher, Adult, and Lifelong Education at Michigan State University. His research interests include curriculum development and reform, faculty career development, and organizational change. Melissa J. Baumann received her doctorate in Materials Science and Engineering from Case Western Reserve University. She is currently Associate Professor of Engineering at Michigan State University. Her research interests include biomedical materials research, specifically ceramic scaffolds in bone tissue engineering and biomedical engineering education.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldwin, R.G., Baumann, M.J. Options for Change: A Flexible Vehicle for Curriculum Evolution and Reform. Innov High Educ 30, 89–98 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-4958-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-4958-7

Key Words

Navigation