Physician response to financial incentives when choosing drugs to treat breast cancer
- 380 Downloads
This paper considers physician agency in choosing drugs to treat metastatic breast cancer, a clinical setting in which patients have few protections from physicians’ rent seeking. Physicians have explicit financial incentives attached to each potential drug treatment, with profit margins ranging more than a hundred fold. SEER-Medicare claims and Medispan pricing data were formed into a panel of 4,503 patients who were diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and treated with anti-cancer drugs from 1992 to 2002. We analyzed the effects of product attributes, including profit margin, randomized controlled trial citations, FDA label, generic status, and other covariates on therapy choice. Instruments and drug fixed effects were used to control for omitted variables and possible measurement error associated with margin. We find that increasing physician margin by 10% yields between an 11 and 177% increase in the likelihood of drug choice on average across drugs. Physicians were more likely to use drugs with which they had experience, had more citations, and were FDA-approved to treat breast cancer. Oncologists are susceptible to financial incentives when choosing drugs, though other factors play a large role in their choice of drug.
KeywordsAgency Physician treatment decisions Financial incentives Medicare Reimbursement
JEL ClassificationI11 D82
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Casalino, L. P. (2008). Physician self-referral and physician-owned specialty facilities. The Synthesis Project, Issue 15. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, June 2008.Google Scholar
- Earle C., Nattinger A., Potosky A., Lang K., Mallick R., Berger M., Warren J. (2002) Identifying cancer relapse using SEER-Medicare data. Medical Care 40(8S): 75–81Google Scholar
- McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analyses of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers of econometrics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Office of the Inspector General Report. (2001). Medicaid Pharmacy—Actual acquisition costs of brand name prescription drug products (A-06-00-00023).Google Scholar
- Office of the Inspector General Report. (2002). Medicaid Pharmacy—Actual acquisition costs of generic prescription drug products (A-06-01-00053).Google Scholar
- Rischatsch, M., & Trottmann, M. (2009). Physician dispensing and the choice between generic and brand-name drugs: Do margins affect choice? Working paper. Accessed July 6, 2012, from http://www.soi.uzh.ch/research/wp/2009/wp0911.pdf.
- Schondelmeyer, S. W., & Wrobel, M. V. (2004). Medicaid and Medicare drug pricing: Strategy to determine market prices. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc., Prepared for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Contract #500-00-0049.Google Scholar
- Warren J., Klabunde C., Schrag D., Bach P., Riley G. (2002) Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: Content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Medical Care 40(8S): 3–18Google Scholar