Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk selection and complementary health insurance: The Swiss approach

  • Published:
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To avoid risk selection, the market for complementary health insurance is usually completely separate from the market for basic health insurance. In Switzerland, however, the basic benefit package and complementary insurance are offered by the same insurer. Risk-based premiums are allowed with respect to complementary insurance. This paper compares the Swiss integration approach to the separation approach. It is shown that under the integration approach insurers cream-skim by selling complementary insurance to low risks at a discount. Nevertheless, the integration approach can be Pareto-superior if the cost savings due to the integration of basic and complementary insurance are sufficiently large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, K. (1998). “Kann der Risikoausgleich unterlaufen werden? Analyse der schweizerischen Ausgleichsformel,” in Gesellschaft für Recht und Politik im Gesundheitswesen (eds.), Fairneβ, Effizienz und Qualitat in der Gesundheitsversorgung: was kann der Risikostrukturausgleich dazu leisten? pp. 99–146 Springer: Heidelberg.

  • Bundesamt für Sozialversicherung (2000). “Veränderungen im Bereich der Zusatzversicherung aufgrund des KVG,” BSV-Forschungsbericht 04/00, Bundesamt für Sozialversicherung, Bern.

  • Colombo, F. (2001). “Towards More Choice in Social Protection? Individual Choice of Insurer in Basic Mandatory Health Insurance in Switzerland,” OECD Labour Market and Social Policy—Occasional Paper 53, OECD.

  • Danzon, P. (2002). “Welfare Effects of Supplementary Insurance: A Comment.” Journal of Health Economics 21, 923–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, J. and T. McGuire (2000). “Optimal Risk Adjustment in Markets with Adverse Selection: An Application to Managed Care,” American Economic Review 90, 1055–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kifmann, M. (2002). “Community Rating in Health Insurance and Different Benefit Packages,” Journal of Health Economics 21, 719–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossialos, E., S. Thomson, R. Busse, C. Economou, M. Giannoni-Mazzi, J. Hermesse, T. Hockley, M. M. Hofmarcher, H. Maarse, H. Mikkola, M. Oliveira, M. Rodrìguez, S. Sandier, C. Skoglund, P. Ulmann, and K. Vrangbæ k (2002). “Voluntary Health Insurance in the European Union,” Report prepared for the directorate general for employment and social affairs of the european commission, http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc-prot/social/vhi.pdf.

  • Pauly, M. (1984). “Is Cream-Skimming a Problem for the Competitive Medical Market?,” Journal of Health Economics 3, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M., P. Danzon, P. Feldstein, and J. Hoff (1992). Responsible National Health Insurance. Washington, D.C. AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M. and B. Herring (1999). Pooling Health Insurance Risks. American Enterprise Institute: D.C. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellhorn, M. (2001). “The Effect of Variable Health Insurance Deductibles on the Demand for Physician Visits,” Health Economics 10, 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werblow, A. and S. Felder (2003). “Der Einfluss von freiwilligen Selbstbehalten in der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung: Evidenz aus der Schweiz,” Schmollers Jahrbuch 123, 235–264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias Kifmann.

Additional information

JEL Classification H51 · I18

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kifmann, M. Risk selection and complementary health insurance: The Swiss approach. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 6, 151–170 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-006-8162-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-006-8162-9

Keywords

Navigation