Skip to main content
Log in

The Effects of Anti-Adhesion Materials in Preventing Postoperative Adhesion in Abdominal Cavity (Anti-Adhesion Materials for Postoperative Adhesions)

  • Published:
Inflammation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of anti-adhesion materials in postoperative adhesions.

Materials and Methods

Rats were assigned to five groups: Group 1: Control. Group 2: chitin layers were used. Group 3: Na-hyaluronate / carboxymethylcellulose layers were used. Group 4: Na-hyaluronate gel was poured into the abdomen. Group 5: methylprednisolone was injected. The adhesion frequency and grade were scored according to Granat. Blood was taken for Hb, AST, BUN and albumin levels determination.

Findings

The adhesion frequencies (right and left) and grades were as follow in Groups; I: 82%, 91%, 2.63 ± 1.22; II: 8.3%, 25%, 0.58 ± 0.66; III: 17%, 33%, 1.08 ± 1.08; IV: 50%, 58%, 1.41 ± 1.44; V: 50%, 42%, 1.41 ± 1.50. The adhesion phase in all study groups was found significantly low compared to control group, p < 0.05. No difference was observed among serologic and hematological parameters in all groups.

Conclusion

All the materials used significantly lowered the adhesion frequency and grade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellis, H. 1978. Wound repair-reaction of the peritoneum to injury. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. 60:219–221.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sahin, M., B. Gürocak, S. Tavlı, et al. Effects of different doses of stefsroid in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions. Int. J. Surg. Investig. 3:301–306.

  3. Kazman, S. H., M. Belviranl, M. ahin, et al. 1997. Mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyona bal opere edilmi hastalarn klinik analizi. T. Klin. 17:203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lehr, C.-M., J. A. Bouwstra, E. H. Schacht, et al. 1992. In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 78:43–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Obara, K., M. Ishihara, T. Ishizuka, et al. 2003. Photocrosslinkable chitosan hydrogel containing fibroblast growth factor-2 stimulates wound healing in healing-impaired db/db mice. Biomaterials 24:3437–3444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Granat, M., I. Tur-Kapsa, E. Zylber-Katz, et al. 1983. Reduction of peritoneal adhesion formation by colchicine: a comparative study in the rat. Fertil. Steril. 40:369–372.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stewardson, R. H., C. T. Bombeck, and L. M. Nyhus. 1978. Critical operative management of small bowel obstruction. Ann. Surg. 187:189–193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raf, L. E. 1969. Causes of abdominal adhesions in cases of intestinal obstructions. Acta Chir. Scand. 135:75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sannella, N. A. 1975. Early and late obstruction of the small bowel after abdominoperineal resection. Am. J. Surg. 130:270–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Raf, L. E. 1969. Causes of small intestinal obstruction. A study covering the Stockholm area. Acta Chir. Scand. 135:67–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Özer, . B., E. Kaymak, et al. 1990. Peritonun yaralanmaya kar reaksiyonu ve periton içi yapklk problemi (In Turkish). zmir Devlet Hastanesi Tp Dergisi 28:237–243.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gazzaniga, A. B., J. M. James, J. B. Shobe, et al. 1975. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions in the rat. The effects of dexamethasone, methylprednisone, promethazine and human fibrinolysin. Arch. Surg. 110:429–432.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Milligan, D. W., and A. T. Raftery. 1974. Observations on the pathogenesis of peritoneal adhesions: a light and electron microscopical study. Br. J. Surg. 61:274–280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vural, B., N. Z. Cantürk, N. Esen, et al. 1999. The role of neutrophils in the formation of peritoneal adhesions. Hum. Reprod. 14:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Grand, E. K., K. E. Rodgers, W. Girgis, et al. 1995. Comparative efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and ani-thromboxane agents in a rabbit adhesion-prevention model. J. Invest. Surg. 830:187–191.

    Google Scholar 

  16. VandeVord, P. J., H. W. T. Matthew, S. P. DeSilva, et al. 2002. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 59:585–590.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordtveit, R. J., K. M. Varum, and O. Smidsrød. 1996. Degradation of partially N-acetylated chitosans with hen egg white and human lysozyme. Carbohydr. Polym. 29:163–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Varurn, K. M., M. M. Myhr, R. J. N. Hjerde, et al. 1997. In vitro degradation rates of partially N-acetylated chitosans in human serum. Carbohydr. Res. 299:99–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomihata, K., and Y. Ikada. 1997. In vitro and in vivo degradation of films of chitin and its deacetylated derivatives. Biomaterials 18:567–575.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dargenio, R., Cimino, C., Ragusa, G., et al. 1986. Pharmacological prevention of postoperative adhesions experimentally induced in the rat. Actu. Eur. Fertil. 17:272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Diamond, M. P., and A. H. DeCherney. 1987. Pathogenesis of adhesion formation/reformation; application to reproduce pelvic surgery. Microsurgery 8:101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kappas, A. M., G. H. Barsoum, J. B. Ortiz, et al. 1992. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions in rats with verapamil, hydrocortisone sodium succinate and phosphatidylcholine. Eur. J. Surg. 158:33–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cohen, B. M., T. Heyman, and T. Mast, 1983. Use of intraperitoneal solutions for preventing pelvic adhesions in the rat. J. Reprod. Med. 28:649–653.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Christin, D., and P. Buchmann. 1991. Peritoneal adhesions after laparotomy: prophylactic measures. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 38:283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reijnen, M. M., P. Falk, H. van Goor, et al. 2000. The antiadhesive agent sodium hyaluronate increases the proliferation rate of human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Fertil. Steril. 74:146–151.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laurent, T.C., U.B. Laurent, and J.R. Fraser. 1996. The structure and function of hyaluronan: an overview. Immunol. Cell Biol. 74:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Adams, M. E., A. J. Lussier, and J. G. Peyron. 2000. A risk–benefit assessment of injections of hyaluronan and its derivatives in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Drug Safety 23:115–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Balazs, E. A., and J. L. Denlinger. 1993. Viscosupplementation: a new concept in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J. Rheumatol. Suppl. 39:3–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Takeuchi, H., H. Yamamoto, T. Niwa, et al. 1994. Mucoadhesion of polymer-coated liposomes to rat intestine in vitro. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 42(9):1954–1956.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bol’shakov, I. N., S. M. Nasibov, D. B. Kulaev, et al. 1994. Use of liquid sorbents based on chitosan for treatment of diffuse forms of peritonitis. Patol. Fiziol. Eksp. Ter. 3:49–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Biagini, G. 1991. Wound management with N-carboxy butyl chitosan. Biomaterials 12:28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weibel, and G. Majno. 1973. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study. Am. J. Surg. 126:345–353.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Moreno, A., J. L. Aguayo, G. Zambudio, et al. 1996. Influence of abdominal incision on the formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: an experimental study in rats. Eur. J. Surg. 162:181–185.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Avsar, F. M., M. ahin, H. Özel, et al. 2001. Effects of hyaluronic acid derivatives on the postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Int. J. Surg. Investig. 3:437–442.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Avsar, F. M., M. Sahin, F. Aksoy, et al. 2001. Effects of diphenhydramine HCL and methylprednisolone in the prevention of abdominal adhesions. Am. J. Surg. 181:512–515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Tekin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahin, M., Cakir, M., Avsar, F.M. et al. The Effects of Anti-Adhesion Materials in Preventing Postoperative Adhesion in Abdominal Cavity (Anti-Adhesion Materials for Postoperative Adhesions). Inflammation 30, 244–249 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-007-9043-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10753-007-9043-1

Key words

Navigation