Advertisement

Hyperfine Interactions

, Volume 172, Issue 1–3, pp 45–51 | Cite as

Fundamental symmetries studies with cold trapped francium atoms at ISAC

  • G. Gwinner
  • E. Gomez
  • L. A. Orozco
  • A. Perez Galvan
  • D. Sheng
  • Y. Zhao
  • G. D. Sprouse
  • J. A. Behr
  • K. P. Jackson
  • M. R. Pearson
  • S. Aubin
  • V. V. Flambaum
Article

Abstract

Francium combines a heavy nucleus (Z = 87) with the simple atomic structure of alkalis and is a very promising candidate for precision tests of fundamental symmetries such as atomic parity non-conservation measurements. Fr has no stable isotopes, and the ISAC radioactive beam facility at TRIUMF, equipped with an actinide target, promises to provide record quantities of Fr atoms, up to 1010/s for some isotopes. We discuss our plans for a Fr on-line laser trapping facility at ISAC and experiments with samples of cold Fr atoms. We outline our plans for a measurement of the nuclear anapole moment – a parity non-conserving, time-reversal conserving moment that arises from weak interactions between nucleons – in a chain of Fr isotopes. Its measurement is a unique probe for neutral weak interactions inside the nucleus.

Keywords

Weak interaction Francium Anapole 

PACS

32.80.Ys 24.80.+y 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bouchiat, M.A., Bouchiat, C.: Parity violation induced by weak neutral currents in atomic physics. J. Phys (Paris) 35, 899 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood, C.S., Bennett, S.C., Cho, D., Masterson, B.P., Roberts, J.L., Tanner, C.E., Wieman, C.E.: Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium. Science 275, 1759 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vetter, P.A., Meekhof, D.M., Majumder, P.K., Lamoreaux, S.K., Fortson, E.N.: Precise test of electroweak theory from a new measurement of parity nonconservation in atomic thallium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2658 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Macpherson, M.J.D., Zetie, K.P., Warrington, R.B., Stacey, D.N., Hoare, J.P.: Precise measurement of parity nonconserving optical rotation at 876 nm in atomic bismuth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2784 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guéna, J., Chauvat, D., Jacquier, P., Jahier, E., Lintz, M., Sanguinetti, S., Wasan, A., Bouchiat, M.A., Papoyan, A.V., Sarkisyan, D.: New manifestation of atomic parity violation in cesium: a chiral optical gain induced by linearly polarized 6S − − 7S excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 143001 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wood, C.S., Bennett, S.C., Roberts, J.L., Cho, D., Wieman, C.E.: The measurement of parity nonconservation in atomic cesium is discussed in full detail; a major portion of this paper describes the characterization and elimination of systematic errors. Can. J. Phys. 77, 7 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fortson, E.N., Pang, Y., Wilets, L.: Nuclear-structure effects in atomic parity nonconservation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2857 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pollock, J., Fortson, E.N., Wilets, L.: Atomic parity nonconservation: electroweak parameters and nuclear structure. Phys. Rev. C 46, 2587 (1992)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bouchiat, M.-A., Bouchiat, C.: Parity violation in atoms. Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 1351 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simsarian, J.E., Orozco, L.A., Sprouse, G.D., Zhao, W.Z.: Lifetime measurement of the 7p levels of francium. Phys. Rev. A 57, 2448 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metcalf, H.J., van der Straten, P.: Laser Cooling and Trapping. Springer, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sprouse, G.D., Orozco, L.A.: Laser trapping of radioactive atoms. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 47, 429 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scielzo, N.D., Freedman, S.J., Fujikawa, B.K., Vetter, P.A.: Measurement of the βν correlation using magneto-optically Trapped 21Na. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 102501 (2004) 93, 102501 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gorelov, A., Melconian, D., Alford, W.P., Ashery, D., Ball, G., Behr, J.A., Bricault, P.G., D’Auria, J.M., Deutsch, J., Dilling, J., Dombsky, M., Dubt’e, P., Fingler, J., Giesen, U., Glück, F., Gu, S., Häusser, O., Jackson, K.P., Jennings, B.K., Pearson, M.R., Stocki, T.J., Swanson, T.B., Trinczek, M.: Scalar interaction limits from the βν correlation of trapped radioactive atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 142501 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crane, S.G., Brice, S.J., Goldschmidt, A., Guckert, R., Hime, A., Kitten, J.J., Vieira, D.J., Zhao, X.: Parity violation observed in the beta decay of magnetically trapped 82Rb atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2967 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perey, M.: Sur un élément 87, dériveé de l’actinium. C.R. Acad. Sci. 208, 97 (1939)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liberman, S., Pinard, J., Duong, H.T., Juncar, P., Vialle, J.-L., Jacquinot, P., Huber, G., Touchard, F., Büttgenbach, S., Pesnelle, A., Thibault, C., Klapisch, R., The ISOLDE Collaboration: First evidence of an optical transition in francium atoms. C.R. Acad. Sci. B 286, 253 (1978)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simsarian, J.E., Ghosh, A., Gwinner, G., Orozco, L.A., Sprouse, G.D., Voytas, P.A.: Magneto-optic trapping of 210Fr. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3522 (1996)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lu, Z.-T., Corwin, K.L., Vogel, K.R., Wieman, C.E., Dinneen, T.P., Maddi, J., Gould, H.: Efficient collection of 221Fr into a vapor cell magneto-optical trap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 994 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atutov, S.N., Biancalana, V., Burchianti, A., Calabrese, R., Corradi, L., Dainelli, A., Guidi, V., Khanbekyan, A., Mai, B., Marinelli, C., Mariotti, E., Moi, L., Sanguinetti, S., Stancari, G., Tomassetti, L., Veronesi, S.: Production and trapping of francium atoms. Nuc. Phys. A 746, 421 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gomez, E., Orozco, L.A., Sprouse, G.D.: Spectroscopy with trapped francium: advances and perspectives for weak interaction studies. Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 79 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sapirstein, J.: Theoretical methods for the relativistic atomic many-body problem. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 55 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ginges, J.S.M., Flambaum, V.V.: Violations of fundamental symmetries in atoms and tests of unification theories of elementary particles. Phys. Rep. 397, 63 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aubin, S., Gomez, E., Orozco, L.A., Sprouse, G.D.: High efficiency magneto-optical trap for unstable isotopes. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 4342 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kulin, S., Aubin, S., Christe, S., Peker, B., Rolston, S.L., Orozco, L.A.: J. Opt. B: A single hollow-beam optical trap for cold atoms. Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 3, 353 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gomez, E., Aubin, S., Sprouse, G.D., Orozco, L.A., DeMille, D.P.: Measurement method for the nuclear anapole moment of laser-trapped alkali-metal atoms. Phys. Rev. A 75, 033418 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haxton, W.C., Wieman, C.E.: Atomic parity nonconservation and nuclear anapole moments. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51, 261 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khriplovich, I.B.: Parity non-conservation in atomic phenomena. Gordon and Breach, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Orozco, L.A.: Trapped particles and fundamental physics. In: Les Houches 2000. Atutov, S.N., Calabrese, R., Moi, L. (eds.). Kluwer, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Precision tests of the standard electroweak model. In: Langacker, P. (ed.). World Scientific, Singapore (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Gwinner
    • 1
  • E. Gomez
    • 2
  • L. A. Orozco
    • 2
  • A. Perez Galvan
    • 2
  • D. Sheng
    • 2
  • Y. Zhao
    • 2
  • G. D. Sprouse
    • 3
  • J. A. Behr
    • 4
  • K. P. Jackson
    • 4
  • M. R. Pearson
    • 4
  • S. Aubin
    • 5
  • V. V. Flambaum
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Physics & AstronomyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Physics & AstronomyStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  4. 4.TRIUMFVancouverCanada
  5. 5.Department of PhysicsCollege of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA
  6. 6.School of PhysicsUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations