Abstract
Powder magnetite was analyzed in situ via Mössbauer with temperatures ranging from 170 K up to 900 K. Hyperfine fields of the tetrahedral and octahedral sites of magnetite as well as the corresponding average field were followed as a function of temperature in order to elucidate the critical behavior of magnetite at around the Curie temperature. Results evidence a progressive collapse of the Mössbauer spectra onto a singlet-type line at a critical temperature of around 870 K characterized by a critical exponent β = 0.28(2) for the hyperfine field. In order to describe such temperature dependence of the hyperfine field, a Monte Carlo-Metropolis simulation based on a stoichiometric magnetite and an Ising model with nearest magnetic neighbor interactions was also carried out. In the model, we have taken into account antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic interactions depending on the involved ions. A discussion about the critical behavior of magnetite and a comparison between the hyperfine field obtained via Mössbauer and the magnetization obtained via Monte Carlo is finally presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cornell R. M. and Schwertmann U., In: The Iron Oxides, VCH mbH, Weinheim, Germany, 1996; Halasa N. A., DePasquali G. and Drickamer H. G., Phys. Rev. B 10 (1974), 154; DaCosta G. M., DeGrave E., Bakker P. M. and Vandenberghe R. E., Clays and Clay Min. 43(6), (1995), 656; Evans R. C., In: An Introduction to Crystal Chemistry, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966, p.173.
Muxworthy A. R. and Williams W., J. Geophys. Res. 104 (1999), 29203.
Williams W. and Wright T. M., J. Geophys. Res. 103 (1998), 30537.
Winklhofer M., Fabian K. and Heider F., J. Geophys. Res. 102 (1997), 22695.
Birgeneau R. J., Cowley R. A., Shirane G., Yoshizawa H., Belanger D. P., King A. R. and Jaccarino V., Phys. Rev. B 27 (1983), 6747.
Brand R. A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 28 (1997), 417.
Uhl M. and Siberchicot B., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 7 (1995), 4227.
Kittel C., In: Introduction to Solid State Physics, 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1996, p. 449.
Iglesias O. and Labarta A., Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001), 184416-1.
Landau D. P. and Binder K., In: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, p. 71.
Newman M. E. J. and Barkema G. T., In: Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1999, p. 46.
Betancur J. D., Restrepo J., Palacio C. A., Morales A. L., Mazo-Zuluaga J., Fernández J. J., Pérez O., Valderruten J. F. and Bohórquez A., Hyperfine Interact. 148/149 (2003), 163.
Ferrenberg A. M. and Landau D. P., Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991), 5081.
Fisher M. E. and Barber M. N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972), 1516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Florez, J.M., Mazo-Zuluaga, J. & Restrepo, J. Ferrimagnetic to Paramagnetic Transition in Magnetite: Mössbauer versus Monte Carlo. Hyperfine Interact 161, 161–169 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-005-9178-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-005-9178-0