Skip to main content
Log in

Whistle structure variation between two sympatric dolphin species in the Gulf of California

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dolphins produce narrowband and frequency modulated sounds called whistles during a variety of behavioral contexts. Dolphin species vary in their whistle contour composition, frequency range, modulation, and duration, and these differences can be useful in their identification. Here, we compare the whistle contours of two sympatric dolphin species at La Paz Bay, Gulf of California, the Eastern Tropical Pacific bottlenose dolphin, and the long-beaked common dolphin. Dolphins were recorded (7 h and 1 min recording effort) from the research vessel with the engine off using an over-the-side hydrophone and a broadband recording system. A total of 666 high quality whistles (bottlenose dolphin, n = 415; long-beaked common dolphin, n = 251) were analyzed. A Random Forest Analysis identified duration, ending frequency, and maximum frequency as the most important variables that distinguish the two dolphin species. The most common whistle contour types of bottlenose dolphins were sine and convex, while the long-beaked common dolphins produced mainly upsweep and concave whistles. The results showed that bottlenose dolphins and long-beaked common dolphins differ in their whistle variables and contours facilitating their identification in future passive acoustic studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Citlali Cuevas, Mario Márquez Segovia and Minerva Valerio Conchas (Programa de Investigación en Mamíferos Marinos-Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur) for their help during the data collection. A special thanks to the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources of Mexico (SEMARNAT) for providing the Scientific Research Permit [Permit SGPA/DGVS/00657/21] to conduct fieldwork activities.

Funding

This study is part of the PhD program of Simone Antichi conducted at the UABCS (Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur). The PhD scholarship to Simone Antichi is provided by Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (Conahcyt) (Grant Number 759498). The boat-based surveys were financed by internal funds of the UABCS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Simone Antichi, Manali Rege‑Colt, Maia Austin, Óscar Carlón-Beltrán, Sergio Martínez-Aguilar and Lorena Viloria-Gómora. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Simone Antichi, Manali Rege‑Colt and Laura May-Collado and all authors contributed to edit the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Antichi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Handling editor: Grazia Pennino

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antichi, S., Rege‑Colt, M., Austin, M. et al. Whistle structure variation between two sympatric dolphin species in the Gulf of California. Hydrobiologia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05675-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05675-3

Keywords

Navigation