Skip to main content
Log in

Coexistence of similar species: evidence of a resource and microhabitat sharing in two intertidal hermit crab species

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theory predicts that species can only coexist if they are sufficiently different in their resource and/or microhabitat utilization; if their needs are too similar, the stronger population will exclude the weaker, unless the two species are equally strong competitors. This hypothesis is difficult to assess in most species because populations are limited by multiple resources simultaneously. In hermit crabs, however, fitness is overwhelmingly limited by gastropod shells, which are their only shelter from external pressures, from predation to harsh environmental conditions. Several hermit crab species have similar shell requirements and occupy the same habitat. Here, we examine the degree of overlap in shell use and microhabitat occupation between two species, one of which (Calcinus californiensis) is clearly dominant over the other (Clibanarius albidigitus) in direct fights over shells. We hypothesized that these species should show microhabitat separation or shell partitioning. We sampled hermit crabs’ presence and shell use in the high- and mid-intertidal. The species overlapped in the two intertidal sites, especially at the higher intertidal, and they occupied preferred and suboptimal shells with similar frequency. The co-occurrence and strong overlap in shell use of these two species could be explained by a resource exploitation versus interference trade-off, relaxed selection pressure on shell characteristics due to small body size, spatial/temporal niche segregation, or dominance by Ca. californiensis that has yet to result in habitat displacement of Cl. albidigitus. Further research is needed to determine which of these hypotheses explain the apparent coexistence of ecologically similar species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, R. T., 1968. A Guide to Field Identification Seashells of North America, Golden Press, New York:

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P., 1980. Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in a tropical hermit crab community. Ecology 46: 365–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P., 1981. Alternative methods of measuring competition applied to two Australian hermit crabs. Oecologia 51: 233–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, P., 1983. The theory of limiting similarity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 359–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, M. A. & S. A. Navarrete, 2011. Distribution and activity patterns in an intertidal grazer assemblage: influence of temporal and spatial organization on interspecific associations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 431: 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz, G. & K. N. García-Cabello, 2017. Feeding and metabolic compensations in response to different foraging costs. Hydrobiologia 787: 217–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz, G. & G. I. Jofre, 2017. Aggressiveness compensates for low muscle strength and metabolic disadvantages in shell fighting: an outcome of the individual’s past. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71: 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz, G. & K. Kruesi, 2012. Exploring the phenotypic plasticity of standard metabolic rate and its inter-individual consistency in the hermit crab Calcinus californiensis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 412: 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz, G. & K. Kruesi, 2019. Niche overlap and resource partitioning between two intertidal hermit crab species. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 99: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz, G., K. Kruesi & L. M. Burciaga, 2020. The exploitation strategy determines the resource partitioning in hermit crabs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 523: 151272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz, G., B. Toledo & L. M. Burciaga, 2020. The energetic costs of living in the surf and impacts on zonation of shells occupied by hermit crabs. The Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.222703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arce, E. & G. Alcaraz, 2013. Plasticity of shell preference and its antipredatory advantages in the hermit crab Calcinus californiensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 91: 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argüelles, A., F. Álvarez & G. Alcaraz, 2009. Shell architecture and its relation to shell occupation by the hermit crab Clibanarius antillensis under different wave action conditions. Scientia Marina 73: 717–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, C., B. A. Hazlett & D. A. N. Rittschof, 1976. Effects of interspecific competition on fitness of the hermit crab Clibanarius tricolor. Ecology 57: 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. K., 1997. Ecology of tropical hermit crabs at Quirimba Island, Mozambique: distribution, abundance and activity. Marine Ecology Progress Series 154: 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G., 2000. The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. American Naturalist 155: 606–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness, M. D., 1981a. The influence of shell-type on hermit crab growth rate and clutch size (Decapoda, Anomura). Crustaceana 40: 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness, M. D., 1981b. Conflicting advantages in resource utilization: the hermit crab housing dilemma. The American Naturalist 118: 432–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burciaga, L. M., A. Alvarez & G. Alcaraz, 2021. Same resource, different benefits: hermit crab shell structure advantages owners, but not intruders in agonistic interactions. Hydrobiologia 848: 2539–2550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busato, P., C. Benvenuto & F. Gherardi, 1998. Competitive dynamics of a mediterranean hermit crab assemblage: the role of interference and exploitative competition for shells. Journal of Natural History 32: 1447–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, R., G. Charmantier & P. Thuet, 1988. Osmotic regulation in the hermit crab Clibanarius erythropus. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 16: 325–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, P., 2000. Mechanism of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloyed, C. S. & P. K. Eason, 2017. Niche partitioning and the role of intraspecific niche variation in structuring a guild of generalist anurans. Royal Society Open Science 4: 170060.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. W., 1998. Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecological Entomology 23: 484–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Iglesia, H. O. & Y. W. A. Hsu, 2010. Biological clocks and rhythms in intertidal crustaceans. Frontiers in Bioscience - Elite. 2: 1394–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M. W., T. L. Daniel & M. A. R. Koehl, 1985. Mechanical limits to size in wave-swept organisms. Ecological Monograph 55: 69–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrøm, C. T. & H. Sørensen, 2015. Statistical Data Analysis for the Life Sciences, CRC Press, London:

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne, R. S. & D. Alonso, 2007. Neutral community theory: how stochasticity and dispersal-limitation can explain species coexistence. Journal of Statistical Physics 128: 485–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellers, J. H., 1987. Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecological Society of America 68: 1466–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floeter, S. R., R. C. Nalesso, M. M. P. Rodrigues & A. Turra, 2000. Patterns of shell utilization and selection in two sympatric hermit crabs (Anomura: Diogenidae) in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80: 1053–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, N., 1976. Population consequences of shell utilization by hermit crabs. Ecology 57: 570–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause, G. F., 1934. Experimental analysis of Vito Volterra’s mathematical theory of the struggle for existence. Science 79: 16–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, F., 1990. Competition and coexistence in two Mediterranean hermit crabs, Calcinus ornatus (Roux) and Clibanarius erythropus (Latreille) (Decapoda, Anomura). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 143: 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, F. & F. Nardone, 1977. The question of coexistence in hermit crabs: population ecology of a tropical intertidal assemblage. Crustaceana 70: 608–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. E., 2000. The coexistence of species. Revista Chilena De Historia Natural 73: 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, D. R., 1998. Hermit crab shell use patterns: response to previous shell experience and to water flow. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 228: 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G., 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131: 1292–1297.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, B. A., 1966. Social behavior of the Paguridae and Diogenidae of Curacao. Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean Islands 23: 1–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, B. A., 1981. The behavioral ecology of hermit crabs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett, B. A., 1983. Interspecific negotiations: mutual gain in exchanges of a limiting resource. Animal Behavior 31: 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, H. S., 1966. Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. The American Naturalist 100: 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houle, A., W. L. Vickery & C. A. Chapman, 2006. Testing mechanisms of coexistence among two species of frugivorous primates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 1034–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell, S. P., 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32), Princeton University Press:

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey, R. B. & E. R. Pianka, 1981. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62: 991–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1961. The paradox of the plankton. American Naturalist XCV: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, A. M., 1971. Sea Shells of Tropical West America, Stanford University Press, Redwood City:

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, C. W., 1977. Coexistence in a hermit crab species ensemble. The Biological Bulletin 153: 133–144.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, R. W., 1982. Diet overlap between Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, silver hake, Merluccius bilinearis, and fifteen other northwest Atlantic finfish. Fishery Bulletin 80: 745–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonetti, D., M. Centorame & A. Fanfani, 2019. Differences in exploitation and interference ability between two dominant ants: the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) and Tapinoma magnum. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 31: 369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisita, M., 1959. Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kiushu University. Series E (Biology) 3: 64–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parejo, D. & J. M. Avilés, 2016. Social information use by competitors: resolving the enigma of species coexistence in animals? Ecosphere 7: e1295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres, P. A. S., A. P. Ferreira & F. P. P. Leite, 2018. Expanding the “shell exchange market” hypothesis for clustering behavior in intertidal hermit crabs: mating and tide as proximate factors. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 500: 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, E. S., 1968. Annual breeding seasons of three sympatric species of tropical intertidal hermit crabs, with a discussion of factors controlling breeding. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 2: 308–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, E. S., 1969. Behavioral adaptations of intertidal hermit crabs. Integrative and Comparative Biology 9: 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, C. C., A. A. Braga, E. T. Nunes, A. P. Madureira & G. Bertini, 2019. The anomuran and brachyuran communities (Crustacea: Decapoda) in sheltered and exposed rocky shores from anchieta and guarapari regions (Espírito Santo), Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 47: 467–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. L., 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. American Naturalist 137: S5–S28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, S. E., 1978. Osmotic balance and respiration in the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus, exposed to fluctuating salinities. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 58: 869–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siepielski, A. M. & M. A. McPeek, 2010. On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program. Ecology 91: 3153–3164.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turra, A. & F. P. P. Leite, 2000. Population biology and growth of three sympatric species of intertidal hermit crabs in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80: 1061–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turra, a, & M. R. Denadai, 2003. Daily activity of four tropical intertidal hermit crabs from southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63: 537–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, R. R., 1972a. The role of shell adequacy in behavioral interactions involving hermit crabs. Ecology 53: 1075–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, R. R., 1972b. Competition and mechanism of coexistence in three sympatric of intertidal hermit crabs. Ecology 53: 1062–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volterra, V., 1926. Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118: 558–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P., 2008. Encyclopedia of Tidepools and Rocky Shores. Choice Reviews Online, University of Califonia Press, Berkeley:

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno, N. J. Walker, A. A. Saveliev & G. M. Smith, 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R, Springer, New York:

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT-IN218321). We thank Isabel Ortiz and Elsah Arce for their support in field work. We thank the Laboratorio de Malacología ICMYL/UNAM, Colección Nacional de Crustáceos UNAM, and Departamento de Ecología of the Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias in Guadalajara for support in gastropod and hermit crab identification. We especially thank Dr. Lynna Kiere for reviewing this article and for English editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermina Alcaraz.

Additional information

Handling editor: Jonne Kotta

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kruesi, K., Burciaga, L.M. & Alcaraz, G. Coexistence of similar species: evidence of a resource and microhabitat sharing in two intertidal hermit crab species. Hydrobiologia 849, 1531–1541 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04800-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04800-4

Keywords

Navigation