Abstract
Theory predicts that species can only coexist if they are sufficiently different in their resource and/or microhabitat utilization; if their needs are too similar, the stronger population will exclude the weaker, unless the two species are equally strong competitors. This hypothesis is difficult to assess in most species because populations are limited by multiple resources simultaneously. In hermit crabs, however, fitness is overwhelmingly limited by gastropod shells, which are their only shelter from external pressures, from predation to harsh environmental conditions. Several hermit crab species have similar shell requirements and occupy the same habitat. Here, we examine the degree of overlap in shell use and microhabitat occupation between two species, one of which (Calcinus californiensis) is clearly dominant over the other (Clibanarius albidigitus) in direct fights over shells. We hypothesized that these species should show microhabitat separation or shell partitioning. We sampled hermit crabs’ presence and shell use in the high- and mid-intertidal. The species overlapped in the two intertidal sites, especially at the higher intertidal, and they occupied preferred and suboptimal shells with similar frequency. The co-occurrence and strong overlap in shell use of these two species could be explained by a resource exploitation versus interference trade-off, relaxed selection pressure on shell characteristics due to small body size, spatial/temporal niche segregation, or dominance by Ca. californiensis that has yet to result in habitat displacement of Cl. albidigitus. Further research is needed to determine which of these hypotheses explain the apparent coexistence of ecologically similar species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, R. T., 1968. A Guide to Field Identification Seashells of North America, Golden Press, New York:
Abrams, P., 1980. Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in a tropical hermit crab community. Ecology 46: 365–379.
Abrams, P., 1981. Alternative methods of measuring competition applied to two Australian hermit crabs. Oecologia 51: 233–239.
Abrams, P., 1983. The theory of limiting similarity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 359–376.
Aguilera, M. A. & S. A. Navarrete, 2011. Distribution and activity patterns in an intertidal grazer assemblage: influence of temporal and spatial organization on interspecific associations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 431: 119–136.
Alcaraz, G. & K. N. García-Cabello, 2017. Feeding and metabolic compensations in response to different foraging costs. Hydrobiologia 787: 217–227.
Alcaraz, G. & G. I. Jofre, 2017. Aggressiveness compensates for low muscle strength and metabolic disadvantages in shell fighting: an outcome of the individual’s past. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71: 87.
Alcaraz, G. & K. Kruesi, 2012. Exploring the phenotypic plasticity of standard metabolic rate and its inter-individual consistency in the hermit crab Calcinus californiensis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 412: 20–26.
Alcaraz, G. & K. Kruesi, 2019. Niche overlap and resource partitioning between two intertidal hermit crab species. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 99: 135–142.
Alcaraz, G., K. Kruesi & L. M. Burciaga, 2020. The exploitation strategy determines the resource partitioning in hermit crabs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 523: 151272.
Alcaraz, G., B. Toledo & L. M. Burciaga, 2020. The energetic costs of living in the surf and impacts on zonation of shells occupied by hermit crabs. The Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.222703.
Arce, E. & G. Alcaraz, 2013. Plasticity of shell preference and its antipredatory advantages in the hermit crab Calcinus californiensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 91: 321–327.
Argüelles, A., F. Álvarez & G. Alcaraz, 2009. Shell architecture and its relation to shell occupation by the hermit crab Clibanarius antillensis under different wave action conditions. Scientia Marina 73: 717–723.
Bach, C., B. A. Hazlett & D. A. N. Rittschof, 1976. Effects of interspecific competition on fitness of the hermit crab Clibanarius tricolor. Ecology 57: 579–586.
Barnes, D. K., 1997. Ecology of tropical hermit crabs at Quirimba Island, Mozambique: distribution, abundance and activity. Marine Ecology Progress Series 154: 133–142.
Bell, G., 2000. The distribution of abundance in neutral communities. American Naturalist 155: 606–617.
Bertness, M. D., 1981a. The influence of shell-type on hermit crab growth rate and clutch size (Decapoda, Anomura). Crustaceana 40: 197–205.
Bertness, M. D., 1981b. Conflicting advantages in resource utilization: the hermit crab housing dilemma. The American Naturalist 118: 432–437.
Burciaga, L. M., A. Alvarez & G. Alcaraz, 2021. Same resource, different benefits: hermit crab shell structure advantages owners, but not intruders in agonistic interactions. Hydrobiologia 848: 2539–2550.
Busato, P., C. Benvenuto & F. Gherardi, 1998. Competitive dynamics of a mediterranean hermit crab assemblage: the role of interference and exploitative competition for shells. Journal of Natural History 32: 1447–1451.
Castillo, R., G. Charmantier & P. Thuet, 1988. Osmotic regulation in the hermit crab Clibanarius erythropus. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 16: 325–328.
Chesson, P., 2000. Mechanism of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343–366.
Cloyed, C. S. & P. K. Eason, 2017. Niche partitioning and the role of intraspecific niche variation in structuring a guild of generalist anurans. Royal Society Open Science 4: 170060.
Davidson, D. W., 1998. Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecological Entomology 23: 484–490.
De La Iglesia, H. O. & Y. W. A. Hsu, 2010. Biological clocks and rhythms in intertidal crustaceans. Frontiers in Bioscience - Elite. 2: 1394–1404.
Denny, M. W., T. L. Daniel & M. A. R. Koehl, 1985. Mechanical limits to size in wave-swept organisms. Ecological Monograph 55: 69–102.
Ekstrøm, C. T. & H. Sørensen, 2015. Statistical Data Analysis for the Life Sciences, CRC Press, London:
Etienne, R. S. & D. Alonso, 2007. Neutral community theory: how stochasticity and dispersal-limitation can explain species coexistence. Journal of Statistical Physics 128: 485–510.
Fellers, J. H., 1987. Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecological Society of America 68: 1466–1478.
Floeter, S. R., R. C. Nalesso, M. M. P. Rodrigues & A. Turra, 2000. Patterns of shell utilization and selection in two sympatric hermit crabs (Anomura: Diogenidae) in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80: 1053–1059.
Fotheringham, N., 1976. Population consequences of shell utilization by hermit crabs. Ecology 57: 570–578.
Gause, G. F., 1934. Experimental analysis of Vito Volterra’s mathematical theory of the struggle for existence. Science 79: 16–17.
Gherardi, F., 1990. Competition and coexistence in two Mediterranean hermit crabs, Calcinus ornatus (Roux) and Clibanarius erythropus (Latreille) (Decapoda, Anomura). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 143: 221–238.
Gherardi, F. & F. Nardone, 1977. The question of coexistence in hermit crabs: population ecology of a tropical intertidal assemblage. Crustaceana 70: 608–629.
Gordon, C. E., 2000. The coexistence of species. Revista Chilena De Historia Natural 73: 175–198.
Hahn, D. R., 1998. Hermit crab shell use patterns: response to previous shell experience and to water flow. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 228: 35–51.
Hardin, G., 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131: 1292–1297.
Hazlett, B. A., 1966. Social behavior of the Paguridae and Diogenidae of Curacao. Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean Islands 23: 1–143.
Hazlett, B. A., 1981. The behavioral ecology of hermit crabs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 1–22.
Hazlett, B. A., 1983. Interspecific negotiations: mutual gain in exchanges of a limiting resource. Animal Behavior 31: 160–163.
Horn, H. S., 1966. Measurement of “overlap” in comparative ecological studies. The American Naturalist 100: 419–424.
Houle, A., W. L. Vickery & C. A. Chapman, 2006. Testing mechanisms of coexistence among two species of frugivorous primates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 1034–1044.
Hubbell, S. P., 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (MPB-32), Princeton University Press:
Huey, R. B. & E. R. Pianka, 1981. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 62: 991–999.
Hutchinson, G. E., 1961. The paradox of the plankton. American Naturalist XCV: 137–145.
Keen, A. M., 1971. Sea Shells of Tropical West America, Stanford University Press, Redwood City:
Kellogg, C. W., 1977. Coexistence in a hermit crab species ensemble. The Biological Bulletin 153: 133–144.
Langton, R. W., 1982. Diet overlap between Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, silver hake, Merluccius bilinearis, and fifteen other northwest Atlantic finfish. Fishery Bulletin 80: 745–759.
Leonetti, D., M. Centorame & A. Fanfani, 2019. Differences in exploitation and interference ability between two dominant ants: the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) and Tapinoma magnum. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 31: 369–385.
Morisita, M., 1959. Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kiushu University. Series E (Biology) 3: 64–80.
Parejo, D. & J. M. Avilés, 2016. Social information use by competitors: resolving the enigma of species coexistence in animals? Ecosphere 7: e1295.
Peres, P. A. S., A. P. Ferreira & F. P. P. Leite, 2018. Expanding the “shell exchange market” hypothesis for clustering behavior in intertidal hermit crabs: mating and tide as proximate factors. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 500: 100–104.
Reese, E. S., 1968. Annual breeding seasons of three sympatric species of tropical intertidal hermit crabs, with a discussion of factors controlling breeding. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 2: 308–318.
Reese, E. S., 1969. Behavioral adaptations of intertidal hermit crabs. Integrative and Comparative Biology 9: 343–355.
Ribeiro, C. C., A. A. Braga, E. T. Nunes, A. P. Madureira & G. Bertini, 2019. The anomuran and brachyuran communities (Crustacea: Decapoda) in sheltered and exposed rocky shores from anchieta and guarapari regions (Espírito Santo), Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 47: 467–479.
Rosenzweig, M. L., 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. American Naturalist 137: S5–S28.
Shumway, S. E., 1978. Osmotic balance and respiration in the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus, exposed to fluctuating salinities. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 58: 869–876.
Siepielski, A. M. & M. A. McPeek, 2010. On the evidence for species coexistence: a critique of the coexistence program. Ecology 91: 3153–3164.
Turra, A. & F. P. P. Leite, 2000. Population biology and growth of three sympatric species of intertidal hermit crabs in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80: 1061–1069.
Turra, a, & M. R. Denadai, 2003. Daily activity of four tropical intertidal hermit crabs from southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63: 537–544.
Vance, R. R., 1972a. The role of shell adequacy in behavioral interactions involving hermit crabs. Ecology 53: 1075–1083.
Vance, R. R., 1972b. Competition and mechanism of coexistence in three sympatric of intertidal hermit crabs. Ecology 53: 1062–1074.
Volterra, V., 1926. Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118: 558–560.
Webb, P., 2008. Encyclopedia of Tidepools and Rocky Shores. Choice Reviews Online, University of Califonia Press, Berkeley:
Zuur, A. F., E. N. Ieno, N. J. Walker, A. A. Saveliev & G. M. Smith, 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R, Springer, New York:
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT-IN218321). We thank Isabel Ortiz and Elsah Arce for their support in field work. We thank the Laboratorio de Malacología ICMYL/UNAM, Colección Nacional de Crustáceos UNAM, and Departamento de Ecología of the Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias in Guadalajara for support in gastropod and hermit crab identification. We especially thank Dr. Lynna Kiere for reviewing this article and for English editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: Jonne Kotta
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kruesi, K., Burciaga, L.M. & Alcaraz, G. Coexistence of similar species: evidence of a resource and microhabitat sharing in two intertidal hermit crab species. Hydrobiologia 849, 1531–1541 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04800-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04800-4