Abstract
Field observations of the population dynamics and measurements of photophysiology in Lake Biwa were conducted by size class (< vs. > 30 μm) from early summer to autumn to investigate the relationships between susceptibility to light stress and cell size. Also, a nutrient bioassay was conducted to clarify whether the growth rate and photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry of small and large phytoplankton are limited by nutrient availability. Large phytoplankton, which have lower intracellular Chl-a concentrations, had higher maximum PSII photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) but lower non-photochemical quenching (NPQNSV) than small phytoplankton under both dark and increased light conditions. The nutrient bioassay revealed that the PSII photochemistry of small phytoplankton was restricted by N and P deficiency at the pelagic site even at the end of the stratification period, while that of large phytoplankton was not. These results suggest that large phytoplankton have lower susceptibility to PSII photodamage than small phytoplankton due to lower intracellular Chl-a concentrations. The size dependency of susceptibility to PSII photoinactivation may play a key role in large algal blooms in oligotrophic water.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- F ′ :
-
Fluorescence yield under actinic light
- F m :
-
Maximum PSII fluorescence yield in dark-adapted state
- F m ′ :
-
Maximum PSII fluorescence yield in light-adapted state
- F O :
-
Minimum PSII fluorescence yield in dark-adapted state
- F O ′ :
-
Minimum PSII fluorescence yield in light-adapted state
- F q :
-
Variable PSII fluorescence yield in light-adapted state (Fm − F)
- F v :
-
Maximum variable PSII fluorescence yield in dark-adapted state (Fm − FO)
- F v ′ :
-
Variable PSII fluorescence yield under actinic light (Fm′ − FO′)
- F v /F m :
-
Maximum PSII photochemical efficiency in dark-adapted state
- F q ′ /F m ′ :
-
Effective PSII photochemical efficiency in light-adapted state
- NPQ NSV :
-
Normalized Stern–Volmer coefficient of quenching (FO′/Fv′)
References
Abonyi, A., É. Ács, A. Hidas, I. Grigorszky, G. Várbíró, G. Borics & K. T. Kiss, 2018. Functional diversity of phytoplankton highlights long-term gradual regime shift in the middle section of the Danube River due to global warming, human impacts and oligotrophication. Freshwater Biology 63: 456–472.
Agustí, S., 1991. Light environment within dense algal populations: cell size influences on self-shading. Journal of Plankton Research Oxford Academic 13: 863–871.
Agusti, S. & E. J. Phlips, 1992. Light absorption by cyanobacteria: implications of the colonial growth form. Limnology and Oceanography 37: 434–441.
Alderkamp, A.-C., H. J. W. de Baar, R. J. W. Visser & K. R. Arrigo, 2010. Can photoinhibition control phytoplankton abundance in deeply mixed water columns of the Southern Ocean? Limnology and Oceanography 55: 1248–1264.
Álvarez, E., X. Morán, Á. López-Urrutia & E. Nogueira, 2016. Size-dependent photoacclimation of the phytoplankton community in temperate shelf waters (southern Bay of Biscay). Marine Ecology Progress Series 543: 73–87.
Banse, K., 1976. Rates of growth, respiration and photosynthesis of unicellular algae as related to cell size—a review1,2. Journal of Phycology 12: 135–140.
Becker, B., 2007. Function and evolution of the vacuolar compartment in green algae and land plants (Viridiplantae). International Review of Cytology 264: 1–24.
Branco, P., M. Egas, S. R. Hall & J. Huisman, 2020. Why do phytoplankton evolve large size in response to grazing? American Naturalist 195: E20–E37.
Bullejos, F. J., P. Carrillo, M. V. - Argaiz & J.M.M.-S. Ncheza, 2010. Roles of phosphorus and ultraviolet radiation in the strength of phytoplankton-zooplankton coupling in a Mediterranean high mountain lake. Limnology and Oceanography 55: 2549–2562.
Campbell, D. A. & J. Serôdio, 2020. Photoinhibition of photosystem II in phytoplankton: processes and patterns. In Larkum, A. W. D., A. R. Grossman & J. A. Raven (eds), Photosynthesis in Algae: Biochemical and Physiological Mechanisms Springer, Cham: 329–365.
Cermeño, P., P. Estévez-Blanco, E. Marañón & E. Fernóndez, 2005. Maximum photosynthetic efficiency of size-fractionated phytoplankton assessed by 14C uptake and fast repetition rate fluorometry. Limnology and Oceanography 50: 1438–1446.
Cosgrove, J. & M. A. Borowitzka, 2010. Chlorophyll fluorescence terminology: an introduction. In Suggett, D. J., O. Prášil & M. A. Borowitzka (eds), Chlorophyll a Fluorescence in Aquatic Sciences: Methods and Applications Springer, Dordrecht: 1–17.
Duyens, L. N. M., 1956. The flattering of the absorption spectrum of suspensions, as compared to that of solutions. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta 19: 1–12.
Edwards, K. F., C. A. Klausmeier & E. Litchman, 2011. Evidence for a three-way trade-off between nitrogen and phosphorus competitive abilities and cell size in phytoplankton. Ecology 92: 2085–2095.
Falkowski, P. G. & M. J. Oliver, 2007. Mix and match: how climate selects phytoplankton. Nature Reviews Microbiology 5: 813–819.
Finkel, Z. V., 2001. Light absorption and size scaling of light-limited metabolism in marine diatoms. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 86–94.
Finkel, Z. V., J. Beardall, K. J. Flynn, A. Quigg, T. A. V. Rees & J. A. Raven, 2010. Phytoplankton in a changing world: cell size and elemental stoichiometry. Journal of Plankton Research 32: 119–137.
Finkel, Z. V., C. J. Vaillancourt, A. J. Irwin, E. D. Reavie & J. P. Smol, 2009. Environmental control of diatom community size structure varies across aquatic ecosystems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 1627–1634.
Giannini, M. F. C. & Á. M. Ciotti, 2016. Parameterization of natural phytoplankton photo-physiology: effects of cell size and nutrient concentration. Limnology and Oceanography 61: 1495–1512.
Helbling, E. W., P. Carrillo, J. M. Medina-Sánchez, C. Durán, G. Herrera, M. Villar-Argaiz & V. E. Villafañe, 2013. Interactive effects of vertical mixing, nutrients and ultraviolet radiation: in situ photosynthetic responses of phytoplankton from high mountain lakes in Southern Europe. Biogeosciences 10: 1037–1050.
Hillebrand, H., C.-D. Dürselen, D. Kirschtel, U. Pollingher & T. Zohary, 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 403–424.
Hughes, D. J., D. Varkey, M. A. Doblin, T. Ingleton, A. Mcinnes, P. J. Ralph, V. van Dongen-Vogels & D. J. Suggett, 2018. Impact of nitrogen availability upon the electron requirement for carbon fixation in Australian coastal phytoplankton communities. Limnology and Oceanography 63: 1891–1910.
Jin, P., K. Gao, V. E. Villafañe, D. A. Campbell & E. W. Helbling, 2013. Ocean acidification alters the photosynthetic responses of a coccolithophorid to fluctuating ultraviolet and visible radiation. Plant Physiology American Society of Plant Biologists 162: 2084–2094.
Kagami, M. & J. Urabe, 2001. Phytoplankton growth rate as a function of cell size: an experimental test in Lake Biwa. Limnology 2: 111–117.
Kawanabe, H., M. Nishino, & M. Maehata (eds), 2012. Lake Biwa: Interactions Between Nature and People. Springer, Dordrecht
Kazama, T., K. Hayakawa, V. S. Kuwahara, K. Shimotori, A. Imai & K. Komatsu, 2021. Development of photosynthetic carbon fixation model using multi-excitation wavelength fast repetition rate fluorometry in Lake Biwa. PLOS ONE 16: e0238013.
Kazama, T., J. Urabe, M. Yamamichi, K. Tokita, X. Yin, I. Katano, H. Doi, T. Yoshida & N. G. Hairston, 2021b. A unified framework for herbivore-to-producer biomass ratio reveals the relative influence of four ecological factors. Communications Biology Nature Publishing Group 4: 1–9.
Key, T., A. McCarthy, D. A. Campbell, C. Six, S. Roy & Z. V. Finkel, 2010. Cell size trade-offs govern light exploitation strategies in marine phytoplankton. Environmental Microbiology 12: 95–104.
Kirk, J. T., 1994. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems, Cambridge University Press:
Kishimoto, N., S. Ichise, K. Suzuki & C. Yamamoto, 2013. Analysis of long-term variation in phytoplankton biovolume in the northern basin of Lake Biwa. Limnology 14: 117–128.
Kolber, Z. & P. G. Falkowski, 1993. Use of active fluorescence to estimate phytoplankton photosynthesis in situ. Limnology and Oceanography 38: 1646–1665.
Kolber, Z. S., O. Prášil & P. G. Falkowski, 1998. Measurements of variable chlorophyll fluorescence using fast repetition rate techniques: defining methodology and experimental protocols. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Bioenergetics 1367: 88–106.
Lampert, W., W. Fleckner, H. Rai & B. E. Taylor, 1986. Phytoplankton control by grazing zooplankton: A study on the spring clear-water phase1. Limnology and Oceanography 31: 478–490.
Larkum, A. W. D., S. E. Douglas, & J. A. Raven, 2003. Photosynthesis in algae. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, https://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3101397.
Law, T., W. Zhang, J. Zhao & G. B. Arhonditsis, 2009. Structural changes in lake functioning induced from nutrient loading and climate variability. Ecological Modelling 220: 979–997.
Litchman, E., C. A. Klausmeier & K. Yoshiyama, 2009. Contrasting size evolution in marine and freshwater diatoms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Sciences 106: 2665–2670.
Litchman, E., P. J. Neale & A. T. Banaszak, 2002. Increased sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation in nitrogen-limited dinoflagellates: photoprotection and repair. Limnology and Oceanography 47: 86–94.
Litchman, E., D. Steiner & P. Bossard, 2003. Photosynthetic and growth responses of three freshwater algae to phosphorus limitation and daylength. Freshwater Biology 48: 1241–1248.
Marshall, H. L., R. J. Geider & K. J. Flynn, 2000. A mechanistic model of photoinhibition. New Phytologist 145: 347–359.
McKew, B. A., P. Davey, S. J. Finch, J. Hopkins, S. C. Lefebvre, M. V. Metodiev, K. Oxborough, C. A. Raines, T. Lawson & R. J. Geider, 2013. The trade-off between the light-harvesting and photoprotective functions of fucoxanthin-chlorophyll proteins dominates light acclimation in Emiliania huxleyi (clone CCMP 1516). New Phytologist 200: 74–85.
Mei, Z., Z. V. Finkel & A. J. Irwin, 2011. Phytoplankton growth allometry and size dependent C: N stoichiometry revealed by a variable quota model. Marine Ecology Progress Series 434: 29–43.
Menden-Deuer, S. & E. J. Lessard, 2000. Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms and other protist plankton. Limnology and Oceanography 45: 569–579.
Moore, C. M., M. I. Lucas, R. Sanders & R. Davidson, 2005. Basin-scale variability of phytoplankton bio-optical characteristics in relation to bloom state and community structure in the Northeast Atlantic. Deep Sea Research Part i: Oceanographic Research Papers 52: 401–419.
Moore, C. M., M. M. Mills, R. Langlois, A. Milne, E. P. Achterberg, J. L. Roche & R. J. Geider, 2008. Relative influence of nitrogen and phosphorous availability on phytoplankton physiology and productivity in the oligotrophic sub-tropical North Atlantic Ocean. Limnology and Oceanography 53: 291–305.
Morel, A. & A. Bricaud, 1981. Theoretical results concerning the optics of phytoplankton, with special reference to remote sensing applications. In Gower, J. F. R. (ed), Oceanography from Space Springer, Boston, MA: 313–327.
Nishino, M., 2012. Ecological changes in lake Biwa. In Kawanabe, H., M. Nishino & M. Maehata (eds), Lake Biwa: Interactions Between Nature and People Springer, Dordrecht: 155–238.
Nishiyama, Y. & N. Murata, 2014. Revised scheme for the mechanism of photoinhibition and its application to enhance the abiotic stress tolerance of the photosynthetic machinery. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 98: 8777–8796.
Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, M. Friendly, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, D. McGlinn, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens, E. Szoecs, & H. Wagner, 2018. Package ‘vegan.’ https://cran.r-project.org/, https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan.
Olenina, I., S. Hajdu, L. Edler, A. Andersson, N. Wasmund, J. Göbel, M. Huttunen, A. Jaanus, I. Ledaine, & S. Huseby, 2006. Biovolumes and size-classes of phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings.
Pinckney, J. L., H. W. Paerl, P. Tester & T. L. Richardson, 2001. The role of nutrient loading and eutrophication in estuarine ecology. Environmental Health Perspectives 109: 699–706.
R Development Core Team, 2020. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, http//www.R-project.org/.
Raven, J. A., 2011. The cost of photoinhibition. Physiologia Plantarum 142: 87–104.
Raven, J. A., 2013. RNA function and phosphorus use by photosynthetic organisms. Frontiers in Plant Science Frontiers 4: 536.
Ray, S., L. Berec, M. Straškraba & S. E. Jørgensen, 2001. Optimization of exergy and implications of body sizes of phytoplankton and zooplankton in an aquatic ecosystem model. Ecological Modelling 140: 219–234.
Reynolds, C. S., 2006. The Ecology of Phytoplankton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:
Ripley, B., W. Venables, D. Bates, K. Hormik, A. Gebhardt, & D. Firth, 2020. Package ‘MASS.’ , http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/.
Robarts, R. D., M. J. Waiser, O. Hadas, T. Zohary & S. Maclntyre, 1998. Relaxation of phosphorus limitation due to typhoon-induced mixing in two morphologically distinct basins of Lake Biwa, Japan. Limnology and Oceanography 43: 1023–1036.
Rugema, E., F. Darchambeau, H. Sarmento, M. Stoyneva-Gärtner, M. Leitao, W. Thiery, A. Latli & J.-P. Descy, 2019. Long-term change of phytoplankton in Lake Kivu: The rise of the greens. Freshwater Biology 64: 1940–1955.
Schlesinger, D. A., L. A. Molot & B. J. Shuter, 1981. Specific growth rates of freshwater algae in relation to cell size and light intensity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38: 1052–1058.
Shebanova, A., T. Ismagulova, A. Solovchenko, O. Baulina, E. Lobakova, A. Ivanova, A. Moiseenko, K. Shaitan, V. Polshakov, L. Nedbal & O. Gorelova, 2017. Versatility of the green microalga cell vacuole function as revealed by analytical transmission electron microscopy. Protoplasma 254: 1323–1340.
Shiga Prefecture, 2018. Environment of Shiga Prefecture 2018 (White Paper of Environment). Shiga Prefecture, Ostu, Japan, https://www.pref.shiga.lg.jp/file/attachment/4042980.pdf.
Sommer, U., R. Adrian, L. De Senerpont Domis, J. J. Elser, U. Gaedke, B. Ibelings, E. Jeppesen, M. Lürling, J. C. Molinero, W. M. Mooij, E. van Donk & M. Winder, 2012. Beyond the plankton ecology group (PEG) model: mechanisms driving plankton succession. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43: 429–448.
Sommer, U., Z. M. Gliwicz, W. Lampert, & A. Duncan, 1986. The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Archiv für Hydrobiologie E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nägele u. Obermiller) 106: 433–471.
Suggett, D. J., C. M. Moore, A. E. Hickman & R. J. Geider, 2009. Interpretation of fast repetition rate (FRR) fluorescence: signatures of phytoplankton community structure versus physiological state. Marine Ecology Progress Series 376: 1–19.
Sunda, W. & D. Hardison, 2010. Evolutionary tradeoffs among nutrient acquisition, cell size, and grazing defense in marine phytoplankton promote ecosystem stability. Marine Ecology Progress Series 401: 63–76.
Suttle, C. A., J. G. Stockner & P. J. Harrison, 1987. Effects of nutrient pulses on community structure and cell size of a freshwater phytoplankton assemblage in culture. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44: 1768–1774.
Suzuki, R. & T. Ishimaru, 1990. An improved method for the determination of phytoplankton chlorophyll using N, N-dimethylformamide. Journal of the Oceanographical Society of Japan 46: 190–194.
Tozzi, S., O. Schofield & P. Falkowski, 2004. Historical climate change and ocean turbulence as selective agents for two key phytoplankton functional groups. Marine Ecology Progress Series 274: 123–132.
Van de Waal, D. B. & E. Litchman, 2020. Multiple global change stressor effects on phytoplankton nutrient acquisition in a future ocean. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences Royal Society 375: 20190706.
Winder, M., J. E. Reuter & S. G. Schladow, 2009. Lake warming favours small-sized planktonic diatom species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences Royal Society 276: 427–435.
Wojtasiewicz, B. & J. Stoń-Egiert, 2016. Bio-optical characterization of selected cyanobacteria strains present in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Journal of Applied Phycology 28: 2299–2314.
Wu, X., F. Kong & M. Zhang, 2011. Photoinhibition of colonial and unicellular Microcystis cells in a summer bloom in Lake Taihu. Limnology 12: 55–61.
Yamada, K., H. Yamamoto, S. Hichiri, T. Okamoto & K. Hayakawa, 2021. First observation of incomplete vertical circulation in Lake Biwa. Limnology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-021-00653-3.
Yarnold, J., I. L. Ross & B. Hankamer, 2016. Photoacclimation and productivity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii grown in fluctuating light regimes which simulate outdoor algal culture conditions. Algal Research 13: 182–194.
Yvon-Durocher, G., A. P. Allen, M. Cellamare, M. Dossena, K. J. Gaston, M. Leitao, J. M. Montoya, D. C. Reuman, G. Woodward & M. Trimmer, 2015. Five years of experimental warming increases the biodiversity and productivity of phytoplankton. PLOS Biology 13: e1002324.
Zohary, T., G. Flaim & U. Sommer, 2020. Temperature and the size of freshwater phytoplankton. Hydrobiologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04246-6.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Hirokazu Teraishi for assisting with the chemical analysis. This study was financially supported by the Collaborative Research Fund from Shiga Prefecture entitled ‘Study on water quality and lake-bottom environment for protection of the soundness of water environment’ under the Japanese Grant for Regional Revitalization and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (grant no. 5-1607) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan (https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/tiiki/tiikisaisei/souseikoufukin.html).
Funding
This study was financially supported by the Collaborative Research Fund from Shiga Prefecture entitled ‘Study on water quality and lake-bottom environment for protection of the soundness of water environment’ under the Japanese Grant for Regional Revitalization and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (Grant No. 5-1607) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan (https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/tiiki/tiikisaisei/souseikoufukin.html).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization (TK, KH), Methodology (TK, KH, KK), Resources (KH, TN), Investigation (TK, KH, TN, KS), Formal analysis (TK), Writing-original draft (TK), Writing-review & editing (TK, KH, TN, KS, AI, KK), Supervision (AI).
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Handling editor: Alex Elliott
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kazama, T., Hayakawa, K., Nagata, T. et al. Size-dependent susceptibility of lake phytoplankton to light stress: an implication for succession of large green algae in a deep oligotrophic lake. Hydrobiologia 849, 1115–1130 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04763-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-021-04763-y