Skip to main content

Water velocity and groundwater upwelling influence benthic algal biomass in a sandy tropical river: implications for water-resource development

Hydrobiologia volume 847, pages 1207–1219 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Benthic algae are a major source of carbon supporting aquatic food webs in northern Australia, but little is known about the factors that regulate algal production. We surveyed benthic algal biomass in mainstem habitats of an unregulated sandy tropical river (the Fitzroy River) during a base-flow period. We used predictive models to reveal the physical and chemical parameters controlling algal biomass in mainstem habitats. We found that water velocity was an important driver—algal biomass was lower at higher water velocities. Subsurface flow was also influential—algal biomass increased in locations where groundwater upwelling occurred, as evident by a positive relationship between algal biomass and elevated radon and ammonium concentrations. In this sand-bed river, it is likely that high water velocity destabilises the sandy substrate reducing the establishment of algal biofilms. However, where water velocity is low enough for algal establishment, groundwater upwelling likely promotes algal growth by delivering limiting resources and/or creating stable conditions that promote algal production. The importance of surface and subsurface-flow conditions to benthic algal biomass means that any modification to the Fitzroy River catchment that alters dry-season longitudinal flows (via river regulation) or groundwater levels (via groundwater extraction) may directly influence river algal production.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Allan, J.D. & M.M. Castillo, 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and function of running waters. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E.S., G.E. Likens, D.C. Buso & C.T. Driscoll, 2003. In-stream uptake dampens effects of major forest disturbance on watershed nitrogen export. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 10304-10308.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, B.J.F., 1996. Patterns in Benthic Algae of Streams. In: Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.L., Lowe, R.L. (Eds), Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A., pp. 31-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolpagni, R. & A. Laini, 2016. Microhabitat patterns of soft-bodied benthic algae in a lowland river largely fed by groundwater. Fottea, 16, 244-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A.J., M.A. Brock, B.J. Robson, D.S. Ryder, J.M. Chambers & J.A. Davis, 2014. Chapter 8: groundwater processes and management. In, Australian Freshwater Ecology: Processes and Management. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 174-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, W.C. & H. Dulaiova, 2003. Estimating the dynamics of groundwater input into the coastal zone via continuous radon-222 measurements. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 69, 21-35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K.P. & D.R. Anderson, 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, R.M., H. Rutlidge, D.G. Valdez, M. Venarsky, N.R. Bond, M.S. Andersen, B. Fry, S.M. Eberhard & M.J. Kennard, 2018. Groundwater supports intermittent-stream food webs. Freshwater Science, 37, 42-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.M., S.E. Bunn & S.K. Hamilton, 2008. Primary production in tropical streams and rivers. In: Dudgeon, D. (Ed.), Tropical Stream Ecology. Academic Press, London, pp. 23-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M.M., S.E. Bunn & P.M. Davies, 2005. River and wetland food webs in Australia's wet-dry tropics: general principles and implications for management. Marine and Freshwater Research, 56, 329-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echenique-Subiabre, I., C. Dalle, C. Duval, M.W. Heath, A. Couté, S.A. Wood, J.-F. Humbert & C. Quiblier, 2016. Application of a spectrofluorimetric tool (bbe BenthoTorch) for monitoring potentially toxic benthic cyanobacteria in rivers. Water Research, 101, 341-350.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faggotter, S.J., I.T. Webster & M.A. Burford, 2013. Factors controlling primary productivity in a wet–dry tropical river. Marine and Freshwater Research, 64, 585-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellman, J.B., R.G.M. Spencer, P.A. Raymond, N.E. Pettit, G. Skrzypek, P.J. Hernes & P.F. Grierson, 2014. Dissolved organic carbon biolability decreases along with its modernization in fluvial networks in an ancient landscape. Ecology, 95, 2622-2632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, E.A., N.E. Pettit, D.M. Warfe, P.M. Davies, P.M. Kyne, P. Novak & M.M. Douglas, 2015a. Temporal variation in benthic primary production in streams of the Australian wet–dry tropics. Hydrobiologia, 760, 43-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, E.A., S.A. Townsend & M.M. Douglas, 2015b. Context dependency of top-down and bottom-up effects in a Northern Australian tropical river. Freshwater Science, 34, 679-690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. & J.S. Harding, 2009. Braided river benthic diversity at multiple spatial scales: a hierarchical analysis of beta diversity in complex floodplain systems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 28, 537-551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N.B. & S.G. Fisher, 1989. Stability of periphyton and macroinvertebrates to disturbance by flash floods in a desert stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 8, 293-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, G.A., W.P. Gardner & T.J. Munday, 2014. Tracking groundwater discharge to a large river using tracers and geophysics. Groundwater, 52, 837-852.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, G.A. & N.M. Harrington, 2016. A preliminary assessment of groundwater contribution to wetlands in the lower reaches of Fitzroy River catchment. A report prepared for the Department of Water, Western Australia by Innovative Groundwater Solutions.

  • Harris, T.D. & J.L. Graham, 2015. Preliminary evaluation of an in vivo fluorometer to quantify algal periphyton biomass and community composition. Lake and Reservoir Management, 31, 127-133.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W.R., J. Rinchard & S. Czesny, 2011. Light, nutrients and the fatty acid composition of stream periphyton. Freshwater Biology, 56, 1825-1836.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, J.M., J.P. Benstead, W.F. Cross, A.D. Huryn, P.W. Johnson, G.M. Gíslason, J.R. Junker, D. Nelson, J.S. Ólafsson & C. Tran, 2018. Increased resource use efficiency amplifies positive response of aquatic primary production to experimental warming. Global Change Biology, 24, 1069-1084.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R.J., T.D. Jardine, S.K. Hamilton & S.E. Bunn, 2012. Temporal and spatial variation in ecosystem metabolism and food web carbon transfer in a wet-dry tropical river. Freshwater Biology, 57, 435-450.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, T.D., N.E. Pettit, D.M. Warfe, B.J. Pusey, D.P. Ward, M.M. Douglas, P.M. Davies & S.E. Bunn, 2012. Consumer–resource coupling in wet–dry tropical rivers. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 310-322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Select Committee on Northern Australia, 2014. Pivot North: Inquiry into the Development of Northern Australia: Final Report. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia.

  • Kahlert, M. & B.G. McKie, 2014. Comparing new and conventional methods to estimate benthic algal biomass and composition in freshwaters. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 16, 2627-2634.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuglerová, L., R. Jansson, A. Ågren, H. Laudon & B. Malm-Renöfält, 2014. Groundwater discharge creates hotspots of riparian plant species richness in a boreal forest stream network. Ecology, 95, 715-725.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, R.G. & J.M. Sharp Jr, 1992. On the relationship between river-basin geomorphology, aquifer hydraulics, and ground-water flow direction in alluvial aquifers. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 104, 1608-1620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larned, S.T., V.I. Nikora & B.J.F. Biggs, 2004. Mass-transfer-limited nitrogen and phosphorus uptake by stream periphyton: a conceptual model and experimental evidence. Limnology and Oceanography, 49, 1992-2000.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon, P.E., 1956. A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory density. Forest Science, 2, 314-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. & J.P. Riley, 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27, 31-36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myrstener, M., G. Rocher‐Ros, R.M. Burrows, A.K. Bergström, R. Giesler & R.A. Sponseller, 2018. Persistent nitrogen limitation of stream biofilm communities along climate gradients in the Arctic. Global Change Biology, 12, 3680-3691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R.J., J.M. Melillo, M.A. Lock, T.E. Ford & S.R. Reice, 1987. Longitudinal patterns of ecosystem processes and community structure in a subarctic river continuum. Ecology, 68, 1139-1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedrist, G.H., M. Cantonati & L. Füreder, 2018. Environmental harshness mediates the quality of periphyton and chironomid body mass in alpine streams. Freshwater Science, 37, 519-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, N., D. Warfe, P. Close, B. Pusey, R. Dobbs, C. Davies, D. Valdez & P. Davies, 2017a. Carbon sources for aquatic food webs of riverine and lacustrine tropical waterholes with variable groundwater influence. Marine and Freshwater Research, 68, 442-451.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, N.E., R.J. Naiman, D.M. Warfe, T.D. Jardine, M.M. Douglas, S.E. Bunn & P.M. Davies, 2017b. Productivity and connectivity in tropical riverscapes of Northern Australia: ecological insights for management. Ecosystems, 20, 492-514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, B.J., 2011. Aquatic Biodiversity in Northern Australia: Patterns, Threats and Future. Charles Darwin University Press (CDU Press), Darwin, Northern Territory.

  • R Core Development Team, 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocher-Ros, G., R.A. Sponseller, A.-K. Bergström, M. Myrstener & R. Giesler, in press. Stream metabolism controls diel patterns and evasion of CO2 in Arctic streams. Global Change Biology, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14895.

  • Schneider, S.C., M. Kahlert & M.G. Kelly, 2013. Interactions between pH and nutrients on benthic algae in streams and consequences for ecological status assessment and species richness patterns. Science of the Total Environment, 444, 73-84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sear, D.A., P.D. Armitage & F.H. Dawson, 1999. Groundwater dominated rivers. Hydrological Processes, 13, 255-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R.J., 1996. An introduction to algal ecology in freshwater benthic habitats. In: Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.L., Lowe, R.L. (Eds), Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A., pp. 3-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R.J., 1997a. Resource thresholds and stream ecosystem sustainability. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16, 410-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R.J., 1997b. Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16, 248-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T., S. Guo, L. Tan, T. Li, R.M. Burrows & Q. Cai, 2019. Temporal effects of groundwater on physical and biotic components of a Karst stream. Water, 11, 1299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taniwaki, R.H., C.D. Matthaei, T.K.M. Cardoso, S.F.B. Ferraz, L.A. Martinelli & J.J. Piggott, 2019. The effect of agriculture on the seasonal dynamics and functional diversity of benthic biofilm in tropical headwater streams. Biotropica, 51, 18-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, S., J. Schult, M. Douglas & A. Lautenschlager, 2017. Recovery of benthic primary producers from flood disturbance and its implications for an altered flow regime in a tropical savannah river (Australia). Aquatic Botany, 136, 9-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, S.A. & A.V. Padovan, 2005. The seasonal accrual and loss of benthic algae (Spirogyra) in the Daly River, an oligotrophic river in tropical Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 56, 317-327.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, S.A., I.T. Webster & J.H. Schult, 2011. Metabolism in a groundwater-fed river system in the Australian wet/dry tropics: tight coupling of photosynthesis and respiration. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 30, 603-620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, S.A., E.A. Garcia & M.M. Douglas, 2012. The response of benthic algal biomass to nutrient addition over a range of current speeds in an oligotrophic river. Freshwater Science, 31, 1233-1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, S.A. & M.M. Douglas, 2014. Benthic algal resilience to frequent wet-season storm flows in low-order streams in the Australian Tropical Savanna. Freshwater Science, 33, 1030-1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valett, H.M., S.G. Fisher, N.B. Grimm & P. Camill, 1994. Vertical hydrologic exchange and ecological stability of a desert stream ecosystem. Ecology, 75, 548-560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfe, D.M., N.E. Pettit, P.M. Davies, B.J. Pusey, S.K. Hamilton, M.J. Kennard, S.A. Townsend, P. Bayliss, D.P. Ward, M.M. Douglas, M.A. Burford, M. Finn, S.E. Bunn & I.A. Halliday, 2011. The ‘wet–dry’ in the wet–dry tropics drives river ecosystem structure and processes in northern Australia. Freshwater Biology, 56, 2169-2195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D.R., S.M. Collins, E.M. Purvis, M.J. Kaylor & H.A. Bechtold, 2017. Spatial variability in light yields colimitation of primary production by both light and nutrients in a forested stream ecosystem. Ecosystems, 20, 198-210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Nyikina-Mangala Traditional Owners of the country in which this study took place and the Walalakoo Aboriginal Corporation and the Kimberley Land Council for facilitating the research. We thank John Watson (traditional owner), Marlon Smith (Walalakoo Ranger), the Ymardoo Warra Rangers, Damien Giles (Ranger co-ordinator) and Karen Dayman (Kimberley Land Council/NESP). We thank Chris Keogh for assistance with field sampling, Jennifer Middleton, Michael Smirk and Chris Brouwer for laboratory nutrient analyses and Daniel Gwinn for his statistical advice. This project was supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP Northern Australia Environmental Resources Hub Project 1.3.3), Griffith University and the University of Western Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Room 4.27, Sir Samuel Griffith Building (N78), 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD, 4111, Australia

    Ryan M. Burrows & Mark J. Kennard

  2. School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

    Leah Beesley, Michael M. Douglas & Bradley J. Pusey

  3. Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia

    Michael M. Douglas & Bradley J. Pusey

Authors
  1. Ryan M. Burrows
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leah Beesley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael M. Douglas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bradley J. Pusey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark J. Kennard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan M. Burrows.

Additional information

Handling editor: Judit Padisák

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10750_2020_4176_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Table S1. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients and P-values for correlations among explanatory variables and benthic algal biomass fractions. (XLSX 28 kb)

10750_2020_4176_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx

Table S2. Model-averaged parameters for all terms included in the global models (all data and subset data) predicting algal biomass for each algal fraction (total chlorophyll a, diatoms, green algae, and cyanobacteria). (XLSX 16 kb)

10750_2020_4176_MOESM3_ESM.tiff

Figure S1. Plots of the relationship between water velocity and algal biomass for (a) total algal biomass (i.e. total chlorophyll a), (b) green algae, (c) diatoms, and (d) cyanobacteria. (TIFF 16875 kb)

10750_2020_4176_MOESM4_ESM.tiff

Figure S2. Plots of the relationship between 222Rn concentrations and algal biomass for (a) total algal biomass (i.e. total chlorophyll a), (b) green algae, (c) diatoms, and (d) cyanobacteria. (TIFF 16875 kb)

10750_2020_4176_MOESM5_ESM.tiff

Figure S3. Plots of the relationship between water velocity and algal biomass for (a) total algal biomass (i.e. total chlorophyll a), (b) green algae, (c) diatoms, and (d) cyanobacteria. (TIFF 16875 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burrows, R.M., Beesley, L., Douglas, M.M. et al. Water velocity and groundwater upwelling influence benthic algal biomass in a sandy tropical river: implications for water-resource development. Hydrobiologia 847, 1207–1219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04176-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04176-3

Keywords

  • Primary production
  • Radon
  • Nutrients
  • Tropical river
  • Floodplain