The most widespread pressure impacting river ecological status is the degradation of key hydromorphologic elements, such as sediment type and flow rate. However, almost nothing is known about the quantitative relationship between benthic invertebrate abundance and these elements. This synthesis compiles quantitative data on physical requirements and thresholds for invertebrates relative to two hydromorphologic factors: substrate size and hydraulic energy (measured as shear stress). Both factors are commonly a focus of river rehabilitation. However, we found only limited literature data that we could use to identify invertebrate preferences (189 taxa). Preferred substrate sizes of all stream epifauna we examined varied between 0.05 and 400 mm and they prefer shear stresses from 0.13 to 3.67 N m−2. There was no difference in variation of preferred conditions between the examined taxonomic levels. We suspect that taxa preferring hydraulic environments with shear stresses < 0.64 N m−2 are affected more by environmental factors than solely being constrained by substrate or hydraulic energy preferences. Such taxa might be useful as sensitive indicator species for evaluating stream integrity. Hence, to optimize restoration success for riverine biota, hydromorphological forces should be mitigated by manipulating habitat complexity in a way that it enhances intact ecological processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allan, J. D. & M. M. Castillo, 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Springer, Dordrecht.
Ambühl, H., 1960. Die Bedeutung der Strömung als ökologischer Faktor. PhD, ETH Zürich.
Angradi, T. R., 1999. fine sediment and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Appalachian streams: a field experiment with biomonitoring applications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 49–66.
Barnes, J. B., I. P. Vaughan & S. J. Ormerod, 2013. Reappraising the effects of habitat structure on river macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 58: 2154–2167.
Beauger, A., N. Lair, P. Reyes-Marchant & J. L. Peiry, 2006. The distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in a reach of the River Allier (France), in relation to riverbed characteristics. Hydrobiologia 571: 63–76.
Bérg, K., P. Jónasson & K. W. Ockelmann, 1962. The respiration of some animals from the Profundal Zone of a lake. Hydrobiologia 19: 1–39.
Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S. Katz, G. M. Kondolf, P. S. Lake, R. Lave, J. L. Meyer, T. K. O’Donnell, L. Pagano, B. Powell & E. Sudduth, 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636–637.
Birk, S., W. Bonne, A. Borja, S. Brucet, A. Courrat, S. Poikane, A. G. Solimini, W. Van de Bund, N. Zampoukas & D. Hering, 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators 18: 31–41.
Borchardt, D., 1993. Effects of flow and refugia on drift loss of benthic macroinvertebrates: implications for habitat restoration in lowland streams. Freshwater Biology 29: 221–227.
Bradbeer, P. A. & A. A. Savage, 1980. Some observations on the distribution and life history of Caenis robusta Eaton (Ephemeroptera) in Cheshire and North Shropshire, England. Hydrobiologia 68: 87–90.
Brodersen, K. P., O. L. E. Pedersen, I. R. Walker & M. T. Jensen, 2008. Respiration of midges (Diptera; Chironomidae) in British Columbian lakes: oxy-regulation, temperature and their role as palaeo-indicators. Freshwater Biology 53: 593–602.
Buss, D., D. Baptista, J. Nessimian & M. Egler, 2004. Substrate specificity, environmental degradation and disturbance structuring macroinvertebrate assemblages in neotropical streams. Hydrobiologia 518: 179–188.
Chessman, B. C., K. A. Fryirs & G. J. Brierly, 2006. Linking geomorphic character, behaviour and condition to fluvial biodiversity: implications for river management. Aquatic Conservation 16: 267–288.
Chester, E. T. & B. J. Robson, 2011. Drought refuges, spatial scale and recolonisation by invertebrates in non-perennial streams. Freshwater Biology 56: 2094–2104.
Culp, J. M., S. J. Walde & R. W. Davies, 1983. Relative importance of substrate particle size and detritus to stream benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40: 1568–1574.
Davis, J. A. & L. A. Barmuta, 1989. An ecologically useful classification of near-bed flows in streams and rivers. Freshwater Biology 21: 271–282.
Dewson, Z. S., A. B. W. James & R. G. Death, 2007. A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26: 401–415.
Dolédec, S., N. Lamouroux, U. Fuchs & S. Mérigoux, 2007. Modelling the hydraulic preferences of benthic macroinvertebrates in small European streams. Freshwater Biology 52: 145–164.
Downes, B. J. & J. Lancaster, 2010. Does dispersal control population densities in advection-dominated systems? A fresh look at critical assumptions and a direct test. Journal of Animal Ecology 79: 235–248.
Downes, B. J., P. S. Lake, A. Glaister & N. R. Bond, 2006. Effects of sand sedimentation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of lowland streams: are the effects consistent? Freshwater Biology 51: 144–160.
Duan, X., Z. Wang, M. Xu & K. Zhang, 2009. Effect of streambed sediment on benthic ecology. International Journal of Sediment Research 24: 325–338.
EEA, 2000. European Waters – Assessment of Status and Pressures. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.
Elliott, J. M., 2008. The ecology of riffle beetles (Coleoptera: Elmidae). Freshwater Reviews 1: 189–203.
Elosegi, A. & S. Sabater, 2013. Effects of hydromorphological impacts on river ecosystem functioning: a review and suggestions for assessing ecological impacts. Hydrobiologia 712: 129–143.
Fehér, J., J. Gáspár, K. Szurdiné-Veres, A. Kiss, P. Kristensen, M. Peterlin, L. Globevnik, T. Kirn, S. Semerádova, A. Künitzer, U. Stein, K. Austnes, C. Spiteri, T. Prins, E. Laukkonen & A.-S. Heiskanen, 2012. Hydromorphological alterations and pressures in European rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters. Thematic assessment for EEA Water 2012 Report. European Topic Centre on Inland, Coastal and Marine Waters, Prague, ETC/ICM Technical Report 2/2012.
Feld, C. K. & D. Hering, 2007. Community structure of function: effects of environmental stress on benthic macroinvertebrates at different spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 52: 1380–1399.
Feld, C. K., S. Birk, D. C. Bradley, D. Hering, J. Kail, A. Marzin, A. Melcher, D. Nemitz, M. L. Pedersen, F. Pletterbauer, D. Pont, P. F. M. Verdonschot & N. Friberg, 2011. From natural to degraded rivers and back again: a test of restoration ecology theory and practice. Advances in Ecological Research 44: 119–209.
Fox, J. & S. Weisberg, 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214.
Gabel, F., X.-F. Garcia, I. Schnauder & M. Pusch, 2012. Effects of ship-induced waves on littoral benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 57: 2425–2435.
Gibbins, C., R. J. Batalla & D. Vericat, 2010. Invertebrate drift and benthic exhaustion during disturbance: response of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) to increasing shear stress and river-bed instability. River Research and Applications 26: 499–511.
Gore, J. A., 1996. Responses of aquatic biota to hydrological change. In Petts, G. E. & P. Calow (eds), River Biota, Diversity and Dynamics. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 209–230.
Graeber, D., M. Pusch, S. Lorenz & M. Brauns, 2013. Cascading effects of flow reduction on the benthic invertebrate community in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia 717: 147–159.
Graf, W., A. W. Lorenz, J. M. Tierno de Figueroa, S. Lücke, M. J. López-Rodríguez, J. Murphy & A. Schmidt-Kloiber, 2007. Plecoptera Indicator Database. Euro-limpacs project, Workpackage 7 – indicators of ecosystem health, Task 4, www.freshwaterecology.info, version 5.0 (accessed on 29.11.2012).
Graf, W., A. W. Lorenz, J. M. Tierno de Figueroa, S. Lücke, M. J. López-Rodríguez & C. Davie, 2009. Distribution and ecological preferences of European freshwater organisms. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia-Moscow.
Growns, I. O. & J. A. Davis, 1994. Longitudinal changes in near-bed flows and macroinvertebrate communities in a Western Australian stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 417–438.
Haase, P., D. Hering, S. C. Jähnig, A. W. Lorenz & A. Sundermann, 2013. The impact of hydromorphological restoration on river ecological status: a comparison of fish, benthic invertebrates, and macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 704: 475–488.
Hart, D. & C. Finelli, 1999. Physical-biological coupling in streams: the pervasive effects of flow on benthic organisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 363–395.
Hauer, C., G. Unfer, W. Graf, P. Leitner, B. Zeiringer & H. Habersack, 2012. Hydro-morphologically related variance in benthic drift and its importance for numerical habitat modelling. Hydrobiologia 683: 83–108.
Hering, D., J. Arovitta, A. Baattrupp-Pedersen, K. Brabec, T. Buijze, F. Ecke, N. Friberg, M. Gielczewski, K. Januschke, J. Kohler, B. Kupilas, A. Lorenz, S. Muhar, A. Paillex, M. Poppe, T. Schmidt, S. Schmutz, J. E. Vermaat, P. Verdonschot & R. Verdonschot, 2015. Contrasting the roles of section length and instream habitat enhancement for river restoration success: a field study on 20 European restoration projects. Journal of Applied Ecology 52: 1518–1527.
Holomuzki, J. R. & B. J. F. Biggs, 2000. Taxon-specific responses to high-flow disturbance in streams: implications for population persistence. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 670–679.
Imbert, J. B. & J. Perry, 2000. Drift and benthic invertebrate responses to stepwise and abrupt increases in non-scouring flow. Hydrobiologia 436: 191–208.
Int Panis, L., L. Bervoets & R. Verheyen, 1994. The spatial distribution of Caenis horaria (L., 1758) (Caenidae, Ephemeroptera) in a pond in Niel (Belgium). Bulletin et annales de la Société entomologique de Belgique 131: 47–52.
Jähnig, S. C. & A. W. Lorenz, 2008. Substrate-specific macroinvertebrate diversity patterns following stream restoration. Aquatic Sciences - Research Across Boundaries 70: 292–303.
Janauer, G. A., U. Schmidt-Mumm & B. Schmidt, 2010. Aquatic macrophytes and water current velocity in the Danube River. Ecological Engineering 36: 1138–1145.
Johnson, R. K., 1995. The indicator concept in freshwater biomonitoring. In Cranston, P. (ed.), Chironomids: From Genes to Ecosystems. CSIRO Publications, Melbourne: 11–27.
Jowett, I. G., 2000. Flow management. In Collier, K. J. & M. J. Winterbourn (eds), New Zealand Stream Invertebrates: Ecology and Implications for Management. New Zealand Limnological Society, Christchurch: 289–312.
Jowett, I. G., 2003. Hydraulic constraints on habitat suitability for benthic invertebrates in gravel-bed rivers. River Research and Applications 19: 495–507.
Kail, J. & D. Hering, 2009. The influence of adjacent stream reaches on the local ecological status of Central European mountain streams. River Research and Applications 25: 537–550.
Kakouei, K., J. Kiesel, J. Kail, M. Pusch & S. C. Jähnig, 2017. Quantitative hydrological preferences of benthic stream invertebrates in Germany. Ecological Indicators 79: 163–172.
Krumbein, W. C. & L. L. Sloss, 1963. Stratigraphy and Sedimentation. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.
Lake, P. S., 2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 573–592.
Lamouroux, N., S. Mérigoux, S. Dolédec & T. H. Snelder, 2013. Transferability of hydraulic preference models for aquatic macroinvertebrates. River Research and Applications 29: 933–937.
Lange, C., M. Schneider, M. Mutz, M. Haustein, M. Halle, M. Seidel, H. Sieker, C. Wolter & R. Hinkelmann, 2015. Model-based design for resoration of a small urban river. Journal of Hydro-environment Research 9: 226–236.
Lorenz, A. W. & C. K. Feld, 2013. Upstream river morphology and riparian land use overrule local restoration effects on ecological status assessment. Hydrobiologia 704: 489–501.
Lorenz, A. W., S. C. Jähnig & D. Hering, 2009. Re-meandering German lowland streams: qualitative and quantitative effects of restoration measures on hydromorphology and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management 44: 745–754.
Lorenz, S., V. Martinez-Fernández, C. Alonso, E. Mosselman, D. García de Jalón, M. González del Tánago, B. Belletti, D. Hendriks & C. Wolter, 2016a. Fuzzy cognitive mapping for predicting hydromorphological responses to multiple pressures in rivers. Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 559–566.
Lorenz, S., M. Leszinski & D. Graeber, 2016b. Meander reconnection method determines restoration success for macroinvertebrate communities in a German lowland river. International Review of Hydrobiology 101: 123–131.
Lyche-Solheim, A., C. K. Feld, S. Birk, G. Phillips, L. Carvalho, G. Morabito, U. Mischke, N. Willby, M. Søndergaard, S. Hellsten, A. Kolada, M. Mjelde, J. Böhmer, O. Miler, M. Pusch, C. Argillier, E. Jeppesen, T. Lauridsen & S. Poikane, 2013. Ecological status assessment of European lakes: a comparison of metrics for phytoplankton, macrophytes, benthic invertebrates and fish. Hydrobiologia 704: 57–74.
Mackie, G. L., 2007. Biology of Freshwater Corbiculid and Sphaeriid Clams of North America. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin New Series, Columbus.
Maxted, J. R., B. F. Evans & M. R. Scarsbrook, 2003. Development of standard protocols for macroinvertebrate assessment of soft-bottomed streams in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37: 793–807.
McCabe, D. J. & N. J. Gotelli, 2000. Effects of disturbance frequency, intensity, and area on assemblages of stream macroinvertebrates. Oecologia 124: 270–279.
Meier, C., P. Haase, P. Rolauffs, K. Schindehütte, F. Schöll, A. Sundermann & D. Hering, 2006. Methodisches Handbuch Fließgewässerbewertung. Handbuch zur Untersuchung und Bewertung von Fließgewässern auf der Basis des Makrozoobenthos vor dem Hintergrund der EGWasserrahmenrichtlinie. http://www.fliessgewaesserbewertung.de/downloads/abschlussbericht20060331anhangIX.pdf.
Menninger, H. L. & M. A. Palmer, 2006. Restoring ecological communities: from theory to practice. In Falk, D. A., M. A. Palmer & J. B. Zedler (eds), Foundations of Restoration Ecology. Island Press, Washington, DC: 88–112.
Mérigoux, S. & S. Dolédec, 2004. Hydraulic requirements of stream communities: a case study on invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 49: 600–613.
Mérigoux, S., N. Lamouroux, J.-M. Olivier & S. Dolédec, 2009. Invertebrate hydraulic preferences and predicted impacts of changes in discharge in a large river. Freshwater Biology 54: 1343–1356.
Miller, S. W., P. Budy & J. C. Schmidt, 2010. Quantifying macroinvertebrate responses to in-stream habitat restoration: applications of meta-analysis to river restoration. Restoration Ecology 18: 8–19.
Milner, V. S. & D. J. Gilvear, 2012. Characterization of hydraulic habitat and retention across different channel types; introducing a new field-based technique. Hydrobiologia 694: 219–233.
Milner, V. S., N. J. Willby, D. J. Gilvear & C. Perfect, 2015. Linkages between reach-scale physical habitat and invertebrate assemblages in upland streams. Marine and Freshwater Research 66: 438–448.
Möbes-Hansen, B. & J. A. Waringer, 1998. The influence of hydraulic stress on microdistribution patterns of zoobenthos in a sandstone brook (Weidlingbach, Lower Austria). International Review of Hydrobiology 83: 381–396.
Monk, W. A., P. J. Wood, D. M. Hannah, C. A. Extence, R. P. Chadd & M. J. Dunbar, 2012. How does macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution influence ecohydrological relationships in riverine ecosystems? Ecohydrology 5: 36–45.
Muotka, T. & J. Syrjänen, 2007. Changes in habitat structure, benthic invertebrate diversity, trout populations and ecosystem processes in restored forest streams: a boreal perspective. Freshwater Biology 52: 724–737.
Pabst, S., N. Scheifhacken, J. Hesselschwerdt & K. M. Wantzen, 2008. Leaf litter degradation in the wave impact zone of a pre-alpine lake. Hydrobiologia 613: 117–131.
Palmer, M. A., H. L. Menninger & E. Bernhardt, 2010. River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55: 205–222.
Pan, B. Z., Z. Y. Wang & M. Z. Xu, 2012. Macroinvertebrates in abandoned channels: assemblage characteristics and their indications for channel management. River Research and Applications 28: 1149–1160.
Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks & J. C. Stromberg, 1997. The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47: 769–784.
Poole, W. & K. Stewart, 1976. The vertical distribution of macrobenthos within the substratum of the Brazos river, Texas. Hydrobiologia 50: 151–160.
Power, M. E., J. R. Holomuzki & R. L. Lowe, 2013. Food webs in Mediterranean rivers. Hydrobiologia 719: 119–136.
Quinlan, R. & J. P. Smol, 2001. Chironomid-based inference models for estimating end-of-summer hypolimnetic oxygen from south-central Ontario shield lakes. Freshwater Biology 46: 1529–1551.
R Core Team, 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org.
Rabeni, C. F. & G. W. Minshall, 1977. Factors affecting micro-distribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos 29: 33–43.
Reice, S. R., 1980. The role of substratum in benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution and litter decomposition in a woodland stream. Ecology 61: 580–590.
Robson, B. J. & E. T. Chester, 1999. Spatial patterns of invertebrate species richness in a river: the relationship between riffles and microhabitats. Austral Ecology 24: 599–607.
Robson, B. J. & B. D. Mitchell, 2010. Metastability in a river subject to multiple disturbances may constrain restoration options. Marine and Freshwater Research 61: 778–785.
Robson, B. J., E. T. Chester & J. A. Davis, 1999. Manipulating the intensity of near-bed turbulence in rivers: effects on benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 42: 645–653.
Roni, P., K. Hanson, T. Beechie, G. Pess, M. Pollock & D. M. Bartley, 2005. Habitat Rehabilitation for Inland Fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 484, FAO, Rome.
Roni, P., K. Hanson & T. Beechie, 2008. Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 856–890.
Schmidt-Kloiber, A. & D. Hering, 2015. An online tool that unifies, standardises and codifies more than 20,000 European freshwater organisms and their ecological preferences. Ecological Indicators 53: 271–282.
Schnauder, I., S. Rudnick, X.-F. Garcia & J. Aberle, 2010. Incipient Motion and Drift of Benthic Invertebrates in Boundary Shear Layers. In Dittrich, K., J. Aberle & P. Geisenhainer (eds), Riverflow 2010. Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau, Karlsruhe.
Schröder, M., J. Kiesel, A. Schattmann, S. C. Jähnig, A. W. Lorenz, S. Kramm, H. Keizer-Vlek, P. Rolauffs, W. Graf, P. Leitner & D. Hering, 2013. Substratum associations of benthic invertebrates in lowland and mountain streams. Ecological Indicators 30: 178–189.
Shvidchenko, A. B., G. Pender & T. B. Hoey, 2001. Critical shear stress for incipient motion of sand/gravel streambeds. Water Resources Research 37: 2273–2283.
Singh, J., O. P. Gusain & M. P. Gusain, 2010. Benthic insect-substratum relationship along an altitudinal gradient in a Himalayan stream, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 36: 215–231.
Söhngen, B., J. Koop, S. Knight, J. Rythönen, P. Beckwith, N. Ferrari, J. Iribarren, T. Keevin, C. Wolter & S. Maynord, 2008. Considerations to Reduce Environmental Impacts of Vessels. PIANC Report 99. PIANC, Brussels.
Sonderegger, D., 2012. SiZer: SiZer: significant zero crossings. R package version 0.1-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SiZer.
Sousa, W. P., 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 353–391.
Sponseller, R. A., E. F. Benfield & H. M. Valett, 2001. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology 46: 1409–1424.
Statzner, B., 1981. The relationship between “hydraulic stress” and microdistributions of benthic macroinvertebrates in a lowland running water system, the Schierenseebrooks (North Germany). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 91: 192–218.
Statzner, B., J. A. Gore & V. H. Resh, 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 307–360.
Statzner, B., F. Kohmann & A. G. Hildrew, 1991. Calibration of FST-hemispheres against bottom shear stress in a laboratory flume. Freshwater Biology 26: 227–231.
Stoll, S., P. Breyer, J. D. Tonkin, D. Früh & P. Haase, 2016. Scale-dependent effects of river habitat quality on benthic invertebrate communities – implications for stream restoration practice. Science of the Total Environment 553: 495–503.
Sundermann, A., C. Antons, N. Cron, A. W. Lorenz, D. Hering & P. Haase, 2011a. Hydromorphological restoration of running waters: effects on benthic invertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Biology 56: 1689–1702.
Sundermann, A., S. Stoll & P. Haase, 2011b. River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings. Ecological Applications 21: 1962–1971.
Sundermann, A., M. Gerhardt, H. Kappes & P. Haase, 2013. Stressor prioritization in riverine ecosystems: Benthic invertebrates assemblages are shaped by water quality rather than by local habitat structure. Ecological Indicators 27: 83–96.
Suren, A. M. & I. G. Jowett, 2006. Effects of floods versus low flows on invertebrates in a New Zealand gravel-bed river. Freshwater Biology 51: 2207–2227.
Timm, H., K. Mardi & T. Möls, 2008. Macroinvertebrates in Estonian streams: the effects of habitat, season, and sampling effort on some common metrics of biological quality. Estonian Journal of Ecology 57: 37–57.
Tolkamp, H., 1982. Microdistribution of macroinvertebrates in lowland streams. Hydrobiological Bulletin 16: 133–148.
Tonkin, J., S. Stoll, A. Sundermann & P. Haase, 2014. Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 59: 1843–1855.
Tyler, E. H. M., P. J. Somerfield, E. V. Berghe, J. Bremner, E. Jackson, O. Langmead, M. L. D. Palomares & T. J. Webb, 2012. Extensive gaps and biases in our knowledge of a well-known fauna: implications for integrating biological traits into macroecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21: 922–934.
USEPA (United States Environment Protection Agency), 2009. National Water Quality Inventory: Report to Congress. 2004 Reporting Cycle. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
Vaughan, I., M. Diamond, A. Gurnell, K. A. Hall, A. Jenkins, N. J. Milner, L. A. Naylor, D. A. Sear, G. Woodward & S. J. Ormerod, 2009. Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and managment. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19: 113–125.
Venables, W. N. & B. D. Ripley, 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York. ISBN 0-387-95457-0.
Verdonschot, P. F. M., B. M. Spears, C. K. Feld, S. Brucet, H. Keizer-Vlek, A. Borja, M. Elliott, M. Kernan & R. K. Johnson, 2013. A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters. Hydrobiologia 704: 453–474.
Ward, J. V. & K. Tockner, 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biology 46: 807–819.
Warfe, D. M., L. A. Barmuta & S. Wotherspoon, 2008. Quantifying habitat structure: surface convolution and living space for species in complex environments. Oikos 117: 1764–1773.
Waters, T. F., 1995. Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects, and Controls. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
Weigel, B. M., L. Z. Wang, P. W. Rasmussen, J. T. Butcher, P. M. Stewart, T. P. Simon & M. J. Wiley, 2003. Relative influence of variables at multiple spatial scales on stream macroinvertebrates in the Northern Lakes and forest ecoregion, USA. Freshwater Biology 48: 1440–1461.
Williams, D. D. & H. B. N. Hynes, 1974. The occurrence of benthos deep in the substratum of a stream. Freshwater Biology 4: 507–524.
Williams, D. D. & K. A. Moore, 1986. Microhabitat selection by a stream-dwelling amphipod – a multivariate-analysis approach. Freshwater Biology 16: 115–122.
Wolter, C. & R. Arlinghaus, 2003. Navigation impacts on freshwater fish assemblages: the ecological relevance of swimming performance. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 13: 63–89.
Wolter, C., R. Arlinghaus, A. Sukhodolov & C. Engelhardt, 2004. A model of navigation induced currents in inland waterways and implications for juvenile fish displacement. Environmental Management 34: 656–668.
Wolter, C., 2010. Functional vs scenic restoration – challenges to improve fish and fisheries in urban waters. Fisheries Management and Ecology 17: 176–185.
Wolter, C., S. Lorenz, S. Scheunig, C. Schomaker, V. Martinez-Fernandez, C. Alonso, D. Garcia de Jalon, M. Gonzalez del Tanago, E. Mosselman, D. Hendriks & B. Beletti, 2015. Hydromorphic change and biotic response challenge efficient river rehabilitation. In: Angelopoulos, N., T. Buijse, M. van Oorschot & E. Kampa (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on River and Stream Restoration “Novel Approaches to Assess and Rehabilitate Modified Rivers”. FP7 REFORM deliverable 7.5: 79–84.
We thank Daniel Graeber for helpful comments on statistics and an anonymous reviewer for his help in linguistic editing of the manuscript. This study was supported by the project REFORM that received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration under Grant Agreement No. 282656.
Handling editor: María del Mar Sánchez-Montoya
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lorenz, S., Wolter, C. Quantitative response of riverine benthic invertebrates to sediment grain size and shear stress. Hydrobiologia 834, 47–61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-019-3908-9