Taxonomic quest: validating two mahseer fishes (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) through molecular and morphological data from biodiversity hotspots in India
- 181 Downloads
Mahseers, the members of the fish genus Tor, are economically important as sport and food fishes, but their population is declining in South and Southeast Asia. Taxonomic discrepancies exist in discussions surrounding a few species of mahseer in India. In this study, we hypothesize that Tor mosal is wrongly synonymized with T. putitora, and T. barakae with T. tor. To test this, we collected samples from the type localities, and from known distribution areas. We observed a clear morphological distinctiveness among these four species using Principal Component Analysis. The most prominent distinctive parameters among the four species were body depth and head length. Phylogenetic analysis using Bayesian Inference and Maximum Likelihood for both partial mtCOI and mtCytb datasets revealed monophyletic origin, and supported distinctive species level delimitation which was consensus with morphological identity. Moreover, the automatic species delimitation methods (ABGD and PTP) also quantify the four species. The mean K2P distance was 1.57% between T. putitora and T. tor, 2.60% between T. mosal and T. putitora, 3.27% between T. mosal and T. tor, and 2.63% between T. barakae and T. tor. Based on this study, we validate T. mosal and T. barakae, and provide taxonomic keys to the species.
KeywordsMahseer Tor Northeast India Brahmaputra Barak Eastern Himalaya Indo-Burma DNA barcoding Conservation
We are thankful to the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, for providing necessary facilities through core funding of the organization; and the Department of Forest, Government of Assam for necessary permission of sampling. We also acknowledge the research funding from the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, in favor of Boni Amin Laskar (SB/FT/LS-162/2012) and Shantanu Kundu (PDF/2015/000302). We thank Madeline Jarvis-Cross, a native English speaker of University of Toronto, Canada, and Dr. B. I. Choudhury, University of Toronto, Canada for technical and linguistic improvement in the MS.
BAL, and VK conceived and designed the experiment; BAL and SK collected and identified specimens; BAL captured photographs of fishes; BAL, VK and KC contributed chemicals; SK, KT and BAL generated DNA data; BAL did taxonomic and morphological analysis; VK, SK, and BAL analyzed the sequence data; BAL wrote the manuscript text; BAL, SK and VK prepared the figures; all authors reviewed the manuscript.
- Arunkumar, L. & C. Basudha, 2003. Tor barakae, a new species of mahseer fish (Cyprinidae: Cyprininae) from Manipur, India. Aquacult 4: 271–276.Google Scholar
- Desai, V. R., 2003. Synopsis of biological data on the Tor mahseer Tor tor (Hamilton, 1822). FAO Fisheries Synopsis, Rome 158: 36p.Google Scholar
- Dinesh, K., M. C. Nandeesha, P. Nautiyal & P. Aiyappa, 2010. Mahseers in India: a review with focus on conservation and management. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80: 26–38.Google Scholar
- Eschmeyer, W. N., R. Fricke and R. van der Laan, 2017. Catalog of fishes: genera, species, references. [available on internet at http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp].
- Gray, J. E., 1830–1835. Illustrations of Indian zoology; chiefly selected from the collection of Major-General Hardwicke, F. R. S., 20 parts in 2 vols. Pls. 1–202. Fishes on pls. 84–99 in vol. 1 and 88–102 in vol. 2.Google Scholar
- Hora, S. L. & D. D. Mukerji, 1936. Fish of the Naga Hills, Assam. Records of Indian Museum 38: 328–330.Google Scholar
- Hora, S. L., 1940. The game fishes of India X. The mahseer or the large scaled Barbels of India, The mosal mahseer, Barbus (Tor) mosal (Hamilton). Journal Bombay Natural History Society 41: 784–794.Google Scholar
- IUCN, 2017. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [available on internet at http://www.iucnredlist.org].
- Jayaram, K. C., 1999. The Freshwater fishes of the Indian region. Narendra Publishing House, New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Jhingran, V. G. & K. L. Sehgal, 1978. Coldwater fisheries of India. Inland Fisheries Society of India, Barrackpore.Google Scholar
- Kosygin, L., 2011. Biodiversity and conservation strategies of fishes of the Tlawng river, Mizoram, India, with some new records. In Kosygin, L. (ed.), Biodiversity, ecology and conservation of rivers and streams of North East India. Akansha Publishing House, New Delhi: 1–13.Google Scholar
- Kottelat, M., 2013. The fishes of the inland waters of southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supplementary 27: 1–663.Google Scholar
- Laskar, B. A., M. J. Bhattacharjee, B. Dhar, P. Mahadani, S. Kundu & S. K. Ghosh, 2013. The species dilemma of northeast Indian mahseer (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae): DNA barcoding in clarifying the riddle. PLoS ONE 8: e53704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McDonald, J. A., 1948. Circumventing the Mahseer and other Sporting Fish in India and Burma. Natraj publication, Dehradun.Google Scholar
- Menon, A. G. K., 1992. Taxonomy of mahseer fishes on the genus Tor of Gray with description of new species from Deccan. Journal Bombay Natural History Society 89: 244–258.Google Scholar
- Nautiyal, P., 2006. Rising awareness and efforts to conserve the Indian mahseers. Current Science 91: 1604.Google Scholar
- Sambrook, J. & D. W. Russell, 2001. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbour, New York.Google Scholar
- Talwar, P. K. & A. G. Jhingran, 1991. Inland fishes of india and adjacent countries. Oxford and IBH publishing, New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Thomas, H. S., 1897. The rod in india. Thacker and Company, London.Google Scholar
- Vishwanath, W., 2010. Tor barakae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2010: eT168258A6471070 downloaded on 19 September 2017.Google Scholar