Local and regional effects structuring aquatic insect assemblages at multiple spatial scales in a Mainland-Island region of the Atlantic Forest
- 317 Downloads
Species diversity can be a result of environmental and spatial constrains that act at small and large spatial scales. An important question in community ecology is to know the contribution of each one in studies with multiple spatial scales. We examined aquatic insect assemblages in small streams from the Atlantic Forest in a mainland-island scenario, with the aim of measuring which variables explain the β-diversity of insects at three spatial scales (streams, ecoregions, mainland-island). We sampled 20 streams across four ecoregions, two on the mainland and two on the island. Spatial distribution of streams was hierarchical and ecoregions were isolated. The β-diversity decreased with increasing spatial scale, where higher values were found among streams and not among ecoregions or mainland-island. Our results indicate that the contribution of environmental and spatial predictors to the β-diversity of aquatic insect varies according to the scale of observation. Environmental variables of water and riparian forest had a greater effect on β-diversity among stream sites, while spatial and landscape (physical barriers) variables seem to be key factors at larger scales (ecoregions and mainland-island, respectively), which can prevent dispersal. Our study shows that local environmental heterogeneity had a great importance for maintaining regional diversity of aquatic insects.
KeywordsMetacommunity Alpha diversity Beta diversity Low-order streams
We would like to Rafael Schmitt, Franciéle Garcês da Silva, Javier Toso, Jéssica Pires, Juliano Bogoni, Renata Calixto, and Tamyris Gregolini for help during fieldwork. The authors would like to thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for the Doctoral and Post-Doctoral scholarship (PNPD) received during the study period. M.I.M.H thanks CNPq for the scholarship Research Productivity (Process: 303800/2010-0). We also thank the logistical support provided by the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), as well as the Lagoa do Peri Municipal Park. We thank the Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio/MMA) and Fundação do Meio Ambiente (FATMA-SC) for permission to collect material (permit #32333-3 to MIMH).
- Bain, M. B. & N. J. Stevenson, 1999. Aquatic Habitat Assessment: Common Methods. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.Google Scholar
- Bisheimer, M. V., C. Santos & V. E. Carlson, 2013. A mata Atlântica da Ilha de Santa Catarina, 2nd ed. Lagoa Editora, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
- Bonnet, A. & M. H. Queiroz, 2006. Estratificação vertical de bromélias epifíticas em diferentes estádios sucessionais da Floresta Ombrófila Densa, Ilha de Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29: 217–228.Google Scholar
- Brower, J. E., J. H. Zar & C. N. Von-Ende, 1998. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, Boston.Google Scholar
- Domínguez, E., C. Molineri, M. Pescador, M. Hubbard & C. Nieto, 2006. Aquatic Biodiversity in Latin America: Ephemeroptera of South America, Vol. 2. Pensoft, Moscow.Google Scholar
- Domínguez, E. & H. R. Fernández, 2009. Macroinvertebrados Bentónicos Sudamericanos: Sistemática y Biología. Fundación Miguell Lillo, Tucumán.Google Scholar
- Klein, A. H. F., J. T. Menezes, F. L. Diehl, J. G. N. Abreu & M. Polette, 2006. Erosão e progradação do litoral brasileiro—Santa Catarina. In Muehe, D. (ed), Erosão e Progradação do Litoral Brasileiro. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília: 401–436.Google Scholar
- Legendre, P. & L. Legendre, 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Oksanen, J, F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, R. G. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens, E. Szoecs & H. Wagner, 2013. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0–7 [available on internet at http://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html].
- Pires, M. M., C. B. Kotzian, M. R. Spies & V. A. Baptista, 2016. Comparative assessment of aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in irrigated rice fields and wetlands through different spatial scales: an additive partitioning approach. Marine and Freshwater Research 67: 368–379.Google Scholar
- R Core Team, 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria [Available on internet at http://www.R-project.org].
- Veech, J. A. & T. O. Crist, 2009. Partition: software for hierarchical partitioning of species diversity. Program version 3.0 [available on internet athttp://www.users.muohio.edu/cristto/partition.htm].
- Veloso, H. P., A. L. R. Rangel-Filho & J. C. A. Lima, 1991. Classificação da vegetação brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Rio de Janeiro: 124.Google Scholar
- Ward, J. V., 1992. Aquatic Insect Ecology: Biology and Habitat. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- Wiggins, G. B., 1996. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera), 2nd ed. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar