Dimorphic male squid show differential gonadal and ejaculate expenditure
Under intense sexual selection, males less successful in fighting and mate guarding often adopt alternative reproductive tactics. In many species, males employing alternative tactics show not only behavioral differences, but also divergences in morphology and physiology, a phenomenon called intrasexual male dimorphism. Herein, we investigated intrasexual male dimorphism in the loliginid squid Doryteuthis plei, associated with alternative mating tactics. We show that small males (sneakers) have spermatophores with discontinuously smaller sperm mass and longer spermatozoa than large males (consorts). Moreover, sneakers produce club-like spermatangia, whereas consorts produce hook-like spermatangia, each type of spermatangia associated with a different female storage site and adoption of a distinct mating position. We also show that dimorphic males have different gonadal investment, sneakers showing higher increment rates in testis mass and higher investment in spermatophoric complex than consorts. Under the complex squid mating system, with two distinct fertilization environments, we hypothesize that sneakers may maximize their reproductive success by both investing more in gonad growth and partitioning ejaculates into extra mating opportunities, whereas consorts may benefit from investment in somatic growth. Squids may be the first example of animals that, even with distinct sperm storage sites, fit the general predictions of sneaks and guards theoretical models.
KeywordsAllocation trade-off Allometry Alternative reproductive tactics Conditional strategy Intrasexual male dimorphism Male–male competition Sperm competition Status dependence
This study was conducted as part of the first author’s Master dissertation in the Graduate Program in Zoology of the Department of Zoology, at the University of São Paulo (USP). The authors appreciate the financial support and grants provided by CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel), CAPES/PROEX and CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—Proc. 477233/2013-9). The authors are also grateful for the support from the following laboratories and institutions: “Centro de Biologia Marinha” (logistic support for animal collection and maintenance, light microscopy facilities), “Laboratório de Cultivo e Estudos de Cnidaria” (light microscopy facilities), “Laboratório de Entomologia e Aracnologia” (light microscopy facilities), and “Laboratório de Biologia Celular de Invertebrados Marinhos” (citocentrifuge facilities for spermatozoa preparation). The authors specially thank Dr. Alvaro E. Migotto, from “Centro de Biologia Marinha,” for the invaluable assistance during in vitro experimentation and digital filming of the spermatophoric reaction, Dr. Glauco Machado (USP) for his helpful critical reading of the research proposal, Dr. Bruno Buzatto (University of Southwestern Australia) for the inestimable assistance and critical comments concerning statistical analyses, and the colleagues at CIAC 2015 Symposium (Hakodate, Japan) for all comments and suggestions that helped to improve this study. Glauco Machado, Bruno Buzatto, Vlad Laptikhovsky, and an anonymous reviewer helped to improve the quality of the manuscript and are greatly appreciated. This is a contribution of NP-BioMar (Research Center for Marine Biodiversity, USP).
Online Resource 3 Digital filming of in vitro experiment of spermatophoric reaction and hook-like spermatangium formation in a consort male (mantle length = 252.0 mm) of the squid Doryteuthis plei, conducted under a Zeiss SV-11 stereomicroscope coupled to a Sony NEX FS700 digital camera. The spermatophore was dissected from the spermatophoric sac of the anesthetized male and placed in a Petri dish filled with filtered seawater. The spermatophoric reaction was induced by rapidly pulling the cap thread, aided by dissecting forceps. The reaction encompasses a series of complex evagination processes of membranes and tunics of the spermatophore, resulting on the formation of a hook-like spermatangium (i.e., everted spermatophore containing the sperm mass). (WMV 26364 kb)
Online Resource 4 Digital filming of in vitro experiment of spermatophoric reaction and club-like spermatangium formation in a sneaker male (mantle length = 106.0 mm) of the squid Doryteuthis plei, conducted under a Zeiss SV-11 stereomicroscope coupled to a Sony NEX FS700 digital camera. The spermatophore was dissected from the spermatophoric sac of the anesthetized male and placed in a Petri dish filled with filtered seawater. The spermatophoric reaction was induced by rapidly pulling the cap thread, aided by dissecting forceps. The reaction encompasses a series of complex evagination processes of membranes and tunics of the spermatophore, resulting on the formation of a club-like spermatangium (i.e., everted spermatophore containing the sperm mass). (WMV 9283 kb)
- Andersson, M., 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- Bates, D., M. Machler, B. M. Bolker & S. C. Walker, 2005. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48.Google Scholar
- Boletzky, S. V., 1986. Encapsulation of cephalopod embryos: a search for functional correlations. American Malacological Bulletin 4: 217–227.Google Scholar
- Fields, W. G., 1965. The structure, development, food relations, reproduction, and life history of the squid Loligo opalescens Berry. Fisheries Bulletin 131: 1–108.Google Scholar
- Gage, M. J. G., P. Stockley & G. A. Parker, 1995. Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 350: 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hanlon, R. T., 1998. Mating systems and sexual selection in the squid Loligo: How might commercial fishing on spawning squids affect them? California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations Reports 39: 92–100.Google Scholar
- Hanlon, R. T. & J. B. Messenger, 1996. Cephalopod Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Hanlon, R. T., M. J. Smale & W. H. H. Sauer, 2002. The mating system of the squid Loligo vulgaris reynaudii (Cephalopoda, Mollusca) off South Africa: fighting, guarding, sneaking, mating and egg laying behavior. Bulletin of Marine Science 71: 331–345.Google Scholar
- Hirohashi, N., M. Tamura-Nakano, F. Nakaya, T. Iida & Y. Iwata, 2016. Sneaker male squid produce long-lived spermatozoa by modulating their energy metabolism. The Journal of Biological Chemistry: jbc-M116.Google Scholar
- Moltschaniwskyj, N. A., K. Hall, M. R. Lipinski, J. E. A. R. Marian, M. Nishiguchi, M. Sakai, D. J. Shulman, B. Sinclair, D. L. Sinn, M. Staudinger, R. Van Gelderen, R. Villanueva & K. Warnke, 2007. Ethical and welfare considerations when using cephalopods as experimental animals. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 17: 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team, 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
- Shuster, S. M. & M. J. Wade, 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
- Simmons, L. W., J. L. Tomkins & J. Hunt, 1999. Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 266(145): 150.Google Scholar
- Sinervo, B. & K. R. Zamudio, 2001. The evolution of alternative reproductive strategies: fitness differential, heritability, and genetic correlation between the sexes. The American Genetic Association 92: 198–205.Google Scholar
- Taborsky, M., R. F. Oliveira & J. Brockmann, 2008. The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions. In Oliveira, R. F., M. Taborsky & H. J. Brockmann (eds), Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–21.Google Scholar