Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 810, Issue 1, pp 133–144 | Cite as

An improved method for in vitro culture of glochidia in freshwater mussel Cristaria plicata (Mollusca, Bivalvia)

  • Xue-Yan Ma
  • Hai-Bo Wen
  • Jun Zou
  • Wu Jin
  • Dan Hua
  • Ruo-Bo GuEmail author
  • Pao XuEmail author
FRESHWATER BIVALVES

Abstract

We established an improved method for in vitro culture of glochidia in freshwater mussel Cristaria plicata and compared the transformation percentage in L-15 basic medium supplemented with different plasma from host fish or two non-host fish species. The results showed that the metamorphosis rate of glochidia cultured with host fish plasma and non-host fish plasma was all above 96%. High-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels were significantly lower in host fish plasma than in non-host fish plasma (P < 0.05), suggesting that LDL may be an important nutrient for glochidia metamorphosis. There were no significant differences in the 15-day survival and growth of juvenile mussels obtained from groups with non-host fish plasma under 1100/dish (C5) and a high concentration of antibiotics (D7), as compared with the control (A4) (P > 0.05). The method developed herein not only provides a simplified in vitro culture method for glochidia at a reduced cost, but it also improves the culture efficiency. The method and medium composition may be further improved in studies investigating the long-term growth of juvenile mussels, and it would greatly benefit artificial breeding and germplasm resource preservation for this important species.

Keywords

Non-parasitic metamorphosis Metamorphosis rate Nutrition factor Juvenile mussel culture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Special Scientific Research Funds for Central Non-profit Institutes, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (2016GH10), National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of Freshwater Fisheries Research Center (2015JBFM02) and Ocean and Fishery Bureau of Jiangsu Province (Y2014-38), for providing financial support for this project. We also appreciate the insightful comments from the anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Bai, Y. Z., J. L. Li & B. B. Pan, 2008. Comparison of the parasitism effect of glochidia of triangle mussle (Hyriopsis cumingii) in five host fishes. Freshwater Fisheries 38(1): 3–5, 43.Google Scholar
  2. Bieler, R., J. G. Carter & E. V. Coan, 2010. Classification of Bivalve Families. In Bouchet, P., & J.-P. Rocroi (eds), Nomenclator of Bivalve Families. Malacologia 52(2): 113–133.Google Scholar
  3. Bogan, A. E., 2008. Global diversity of freshwater mussels (Mollusca, Bivalvia) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595(1): 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christian, A. D. & J. L. Harris, 2010. An introduction to directions in freshwater mollusk conservation: molecules to ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27(2): 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dodd, B. J., M. C. Barnhart & C. L. Rogers-Lowery, 2005. Cross-resistance of largemouth bass to glochidia of Unionid mussels. Journal of Parasitology 91(5): 1064–1072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gordon, M. E., J. B. Layzer & L. M. Madison, 1994. Glochidial host of Villosa taeniata (Mollusca: Unionoidea). Malacological Review 27: 113–114.Google Scholar
  7. Haag, W. R. & M. L. Warren, 1999. Mantle displays of freshwater mussels elicit attacks from fish. Freshwater Biology 42(1): 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hua, D., G. C. Xu, H. B. Wen & Y. F. Wang, 2005. Study on the host efficiency of the three kind of fish for Anodonta woodiana pacifica. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Nature Science) 24(3): 213–216.Google Scholar
  9. Hua D., R. J. Neves & Y. Jiao, 2013. Effects of algal density, water flow and substrate type on culturing juveniles of the rainbow mussel (Villosa iris) (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a laboratory recirculating system [J]. Aquaculture, 195(1–2): 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hudson, R. & C. Shelbourne, 1990. Improved in vitro culture of parasitic freshwater mussel glochidia. Report to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, AL.Google Scholar
  11. Isom, B. G. & R. G. Hudson, 1982. In vitro culture of parasitic freshwater mussel glochidia. The Nautilus 96: 147–151.Google Scholar
  12. Isom, B. G. & R. G. Hudson, 1984. Freshwater Mussels and Their Fish Hosts; physiological aspects. The Journal of Parasitology 70: 318–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keller, A. E. & S. G. Zam, 1990. Simplification of in vitro culture techniques for freshwater mussels. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 9(10): 1291–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kovitvadhi, S., U. Kovitvadhi, P. Sawangwong, A. Thongpan, & J. Machado, 2006. Optimization of diet and culture environment for larvae and juvenile freshwater pearl mussels, Hyriopsis (Limnoscapha) myersiana Lea, 1856. Invertebrate Reproduction & Development 49(1): 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lima, P., K. Uthaiwan, S. Kovitvadhi & J. Machado, 2006. In vitro culture of glochidia from the freshwater mussel Anodonta cygnea. Invertebrate Biology 125(1): 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lima, P., M. L. Lima, K. Uthaiwan, K. Satit, C. Owen & J. Machado, 2012. A review on the “in vitro” culture of freshwater mussel (Unionoida). Hydrobiologia 691: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loveless, R., S. Raymond, J. Inman, R. Hudson & M. Fairfax, 1999. Isolation, identification and control of bacteria which threaten in vitro cultures of freshwater mussel glochidia. In Abstracts, 1st Symposium of the Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society, Chattanooga, TN, March, p. 79.Google Scholar
  18. Meyers, T. R., R. E. Millemann & C. A. Fustish, 1980. Glochidiosis of salmonid fishes. IV. Humoral and tissue responses of coho and Chinook salmon to experimental infection with Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) (Pelecypoda: Margaritanidae). Journal of Parasitology 66(2): 274–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Milam, C. D., J. L. Farris, J. Van-Hassel & M. L. Barfield, 2000. Reintroduction of native freshwater mussels using in vivo and in vitro propagation techniques. In Tankersley, R. A., D. I. Warmolts, G. T. Watters, B. J. Armitage, P. D. Johnson & R. S. Butler (eds.), Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH: 53–61.Google Scholar
  20. Owen, C. T., 2009. Investigations for the conservation and propagation of freshwater mussels. Dissertation, University of Louisville, Louisville.Google Scholar
  21. Owen, C. T., J. E. Alexander & M. McGregor, 2010. Control of microbial contamination during in vitro culture of larval unionid mussels. Invertebrate Reproduction & Development 54(4): 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reece, F. T., 2014. Studies on the In Vitro Propagation of Freshwater Mussels with Implications for Improving Juvenile Health. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  23. Reuling, F. H., 1919. Acquired immunity to an animal parasite. Journal of Infectious Diseases 24(1): 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers-Lowery, C. L., R. V. Dimock Jr. & R. E. Kuhn, 2007. Antibody response of bluegill sunfish during development of acquired resistance against the larvae of the freshwater mussel Utterbackia imbecillis. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 31(2): 143–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Su, F. Y., H. J. Wang, B. Z. Pan, X. Q. Liu & H. Z. Wang, 2009. Assessment of species status of mollusca in the mid-lower Yangtze Lakes. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 33(6): 1051–1058.Google Scholar
  26. Tankersley, R. A., 2000. Fluorescence techniques for evaluating lipid content of larval and juvenile mussels. In Tankersley, R. A., D. I. Warmolts, G. T. Watters, B. J. Armitage, P. D. Johnson & R. S. Butler (eds.), Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, OH: 115–125.Google Scholar
  27. Tedla, S & C. H. Fernando, 1969. Observations on the glochidia of Lampsilis radiata (Gmelin) infesting yellow perch, Perca flavescens (Mitchill) in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 47: 705–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Uthaiwan, K., N. Noparatnaraporn & J. Machado, 2001. Culture of glochidia of the freshwater pearl mussel Hyriopsis myersiana (Lea, 1856) in artificial media. Aquaculture 195(195): 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uthaiwan, K., P. Pakkong, N. Noparatnaraporn, L. Vilarinho & J. Machado, 2002. Study of a suitable fish plasma for in vitro culture of glochidia Hyriopsis myersiana. Aquaculture 209(1–4): 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waller, D. L., L. E. Holland, L. G. Mitchell & T. W. Kammer, 1985. Artificial infestation of largemouth bass and walleye with glochidia of Lampsilis ventricosa (Pelecypoda: Unionidae). Freshwater Invertebrate Biology 4(3): 152–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weaver, L. R., G. B. Pardue & R. J. Neves, 1991. Reproductive biology and fish hosts of the Tennessee Clubshell Pleurobema oviforme (Mollusca: Unionidae) in Virginia. American Midland Naturalist 126(1): 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wen, H. B., 2009. Study of germplasm of major economic freshwater mollusks of China. Dissertation, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing.Google Scholar
  33. Wen, H. B., L. H. Qiu, R. B. Gu, G. C. Xu, D. Hua & P. Xu, 2009. The Host Efficiency of Two Kinds of Fish for Glochidia of Hyriopsis cumingii and Impact on Plasma Biochemical Indexes of Host Fish. Chinese Journal of Zoology 44(5): 92–97.Google Scholar
  34. Wen, H. B., R. B. Gu, D. Hua, L. H. Qiu, G. C. Xu & P. Xu, 2011. Culture of glochidia of Hyriopsis cumingii in artificial media and morphological variation of transformed juvenile. Journal of Wuhan University (Nature Science Ed.) 57(1): 57–62.Google Scholar
  35. Xie, M. Q. & G. Q. Li, 2003. Modern Parasites. Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou.Google Scholar
  36. Yeager, B. & C. F. Saylor, 1995. Fish hosts for four species of freshwater mussels (Pelecypoda: Unionidae) in the upper Tennessee River Drainage. American Midland Naturalist 133(1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang, M. H., L. Xu, G. L. Xie, Y. B. Liu, X. M. Liu, S. C. Song, S. Ouyang & X. P. Wu, 2013. Species diversity, distribution and conservation of freshwater mollusk in Poyang Lake basin. Marine Sciences 37(8): 114–124.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wuxi Fishery CollegeNanjing Agriculture UniversityWuxiChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Genetic Breeding and Aquaculture Biology of Freshwater Fishes, Ministry of Agriculture, Freshwater Fisheries Research CenterChinese Academy of Fishery SciencesWuxiChina
  3. 3.Sino-US Cooperative Laboratory for Germplasm Conservation and Utilization of Freshwater Mollusks, Freshwater Fisheries Research CenterChinese Academy of Fishery SciencesWuxiChina

Personalised recommendations