Genital morphology and allometry differ by species and sex in Malawi cichlid fishes

Abstract

The African cichlid fishes show great diversity in mating displays and reproductive strategies, yet species differences in genital morphology have been little studied. Observational notes have described broad sex differences in external genital shape between males and females, but these differences have not been quantified. We examined three aspects of genital morphology (relative anogenital distance, relative vent length, and relative external genital area) in two riverine and eleven Lake Malawi African cichlid species from eight genera. We find the most sexually distinct morphology in the Lake Malawi rock cichlids and the least sexual dimorphism in the riverine outgroup; additionally, diversity in metrics within genus indicates that these traits are recently evolving. Sexual dimorphism in morphology is present in most species, and, in the Lake Malawi species, multivariate discriminant analysis allows for accurate assignment of gonadal sex based on genital morphology and body size. This will serve as a useful method for sexing fish in a nonlethal fashion and provides a starting point for further examination of the evolution of genital morphology in this diverse group of fishes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Anderson, C. M. & R. B. Langerhans, 2015. Origins of female genital diversity: predation risk and lock-and-key explain rapid divergence during an adaptive radiation. Evolution 69: 2452–2467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, G. W., 2000. The Cichlid Fishes: Nature’s Grand Experiment in Evolution. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brawand, D., C. E. Wagner, Y. I. Li, M. Malinsky, I. Keller, S. Fan, O. Simakov, A. Y. Ng, Z. W. Lim, E. Bezault, J. Turner-Maier, J. Johnson, R. Alcazar, H. J. Noh, P. Russell, B. Aken, J. Alfoldi, C. Amemiya, N. Azzouzi, J.-F. Baroiller, F. Barloy-Hubler, A. Berlin, R. Bloomquist, K. L. Carleton, M. A. Conte, H. D’Cotta, O. Eshel, L. Gaffney, F. Galibert, H. F. Gante, S. Gnerre, L. Greuter, R. Guyon, N. S. Haddad, W. Haerty, R. M. Harris, H. A. Hofmann, T. Hourlier, G. Hulata, D. B. Jaffe, M. Lara, A. P. Lee, I. MacCallum, S. Mwaiko, M. Nikaido, H. Nishihara, C. Ozouf-Costaz, D. J. Penman, D. Przybylski, M. Rakotomanga, S. C. P. Renn, F. J. Ribeiro, M. Ron, W. Salzburger, L. Sanchez-Pulido, M. E. Santos, S. Searle, T. Sharpe, R. Swofford, F. J. Tan, L. Williams, S. Young, S. Yin, N. Okada, T. D. Kocher, E. A. Miska, E. S. Lander, B. Venkatesh, R. D. Fernald, A. Meyer, C. P. Ponting, J. T. Streelman, K. Lindblad-Toh, O. Seehausen & F. Di Palma, 2014. The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in African cichlid fish. Nature 513: 375–381.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan, P. L. R. & R. O. Prum, 2016. Mechanisms and evidence of genital coevolution: the roles of natural selection, mate choice, and sexual conflict. In Rice, W. & S. Gavrilets (eds), The Genetics and Biology of Sexual Conflict. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York: 385–405.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campos-Mendoza, A., B. J. McAndrew, K. Coward & N. Bromage, 2004. Reproductive response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to photoperiodic manipulation; effects on spawning periodicity, fecundity and egg size. Aquaculture 231: 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chervinski, J., 1983. Sexual dimorphism in tilapias. Aquaculture 35: 171–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman, R. M. & A. P. Galvani, 1998. Egg size determines offspring size in neotropical cichlid fishes (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Copeia 1998: 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Couldridge, V. C. K., 2002. Experimental manipulation of male egg spots demonstrates female preference for one large spot in Pseudotropheus lombardoi. Journal of Fish Biology 60: 726–730.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ding, B., D. W. Daugherty, M. Husemann, M. Chen, A. E. Howe & P. D. Danley, 2014. Quantitative genetic analyses of male color pattern and female mate choice in a pair of cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. PLoS One 9: e114798.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Duponchelle, F., E. Paradis, A. J. Ribbink & G. F. Turner, 2008. Parallel life history evolution in mouthbrooding cichlids from the African Great Lakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 15475–15480.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, J. P., C. Gasparini, G. I. Holwell, I. W. Ramnarine, T. E. Pitcher & A. Pilastro, 2011. Intraspecific evidence from guppies for correlated patterns of male and female genital trait diversification. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278: 2611–2620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernald, R. D., 1977. Quantitative behavioral observations of Haplochromis burtoni under semi-natural conditions. Animal Behavior 25: 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernald, R. D. & N. R. Hirata, 1977. Field study of Haplochromis burtoni: habitats and co-habitant. Environmental Biology of Fishes 2: 299–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferreira, F., M. M. Santos, M. A. Reis-Henriques, N. M. Vieira & N. M. Monteiro, 2010. Sexing blennies using genital papilla morphology or ano-genital distance. Journal of Fish Biology 77: 1432–1438.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fryer, G. & T. D. Iles, 1972. The Cichlid Fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Getinet, G. T., 2008. Effects of maternal age on fecundity, spawning interval, and egg quality of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 39: 671–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guerrero III, R. D. & W. L. Shelton, 1974. An aceto-carmine squash method for sexing juvenile fishes. The Progressive Fish-Culturist 36: 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hale, E. A., J. R. Stauffer Jr. & D. M. Megan, 1998. Exceptions to color being a sexually dimorphic character in Melanochromis auratus (Teleostei:Cichlidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 9: 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heinen-Kay, J. L. & R. B. Langerhans, 2013. Predation-associated divergence of male genital morphology in a livebearing fish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26: 2135–2146.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hert, E., 1991. Female choice based on egg-spots in Pseudotropheus aurora Burgess 1976, a rock-dwelling cichlid of Lake Malawi, Africa. Journal of Fish Biology 38: 951–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Joyce, D. A., D. H. Lunt, M. J. Genner, G. F. Turner, R. Bills & O. Seehausen, 2011. Repeated colonization and hybridization in Lake Malawi cichlids. Current Biology 21: R108–R109.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kocher, T. D., 2004. Adaptive evolution and explosive speciation: the cichlid fish model. Nature Reviews Genetics 5: 288–298.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kolm, N., N. B. Goodwin, S. Balshine & J. D. Reynolds, 2006. Life history evolution in cichlids 2: directional evolution of the trade-off between egg number and egg size. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 76–84.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Konings, A. F., 2007. Malawi Cichlids in Their Natural Habitat. Cichlid Press, El Paso.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Langerhans, R. B., C. A. Layman & T. J. DeWitt, 2005. Male genital size reflects a tradeoff between attracting mates and avoiding predators in two live-bearing fish species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 7618–7623.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Malinsky, M., R. J. Challis, A. M. Tyers, S. Schiffels, Y. Terai, B. P. Ngatunga, E. A. Miska, R. Durbin, M. J. Genner & G. F. Turner, 2015. Genomic islands of speciation separate cichlid ectomorphs in an East African crater lake. Science 350: 1493–1498.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Martin, Z. P. & L. M. Page, 2015. Comparative morphology and evolution of genital papillae in a genus of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Copeia 2015: 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nichols, P., M. J. Genner, C. van Oosterhout, A. Smith, P. Parsons, H. Sungani, J. Swanstrom & D. A. Joyce, 2014. Secondary contact seeds phenotypic novelty in cichlid fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 20142272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ribbink, A. J., B. A. Marsh, A. C. Marsh, A. C. Ribbink & B. J. Sharp, 1983. A preliminary survey of the cichlid fishes of rocky habitats in Lake Malawi. South African Journal of Zoology 3: 149–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schneider, C. A., W. S. Rasband & K. W. Eliceiri, 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 671–675.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Theis, A., W. Salzburger & B. Egger, 2012. The function of anal fin egg-spots in the cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni. PLoS One 7: e29878.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Theis, A., T. Bosia, T. Roth, W. Salzburger & B. Egger, 2015. Egg-spot pattern and body size asymmetries influence male aggression in haplochromine cichlid fishes. Behavioral Ecology 26: 1512–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Trewavas, E., 1983. Tilapiine Fishes of the Genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis, and Danakilia. British Museum (Natural History). Cornell University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wickler, W., 1965. Signal value of the genital tassel in the male Tilapia macrochir Blgr. (Pisces: Chichlidae). Nature 208: 595–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the North Carolina State University and the WM Keck Center for Behavioral Biology for funding; David M. Reif for statistical consultation and comments; and M. Kaitlyn Stanley and Natalie B. Roberts for assistance with photography.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily C. Moore.

Additional information

Guest editors: S. Koblmüller, R. C. Albertson, M. J. Genner, K. M. Sefc & T. Takahashi / Advances in Cichlid Research II: Behavior, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, E.C., Roberts, R.B. Genital morphology and allometry differ by species and sex in Malawi cichlid fishes. Hydrobiologia 791, 127–143 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2912-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Genital morphology
  • Cichlid fishes
  • Sexual dimorphism
  • Anogenital distance
  • Genital papilla