Habitat structure shaping megabenthic communities inhabiting subtidal soft bottoms along the Algarve coast (Portugal)
- 314 Downloads
The present study analysed the megabenthic diversity in subtidal soft bottoms and assessed the main environmental drivers of megabenthic community organisation along the Algarve coast (southern Portugal). We tested the hypothesis that megabenthic communities respond to the same environmental drivers than macrofauna. We found that similar to macrofauna, megafaunal communities were organised in relation to the depth of closure, light reaching the bottom, and the hydrodynamic conditions related with exposure within the shallower areas. The influence of the main river outflow prevailed over other drivers, but only up to 9 m depth. We found that seven different spatial units should be considered, each characterised by different indicator species. Additionally, among a total of 412 taxa collected between 4 and 50 m depth, we provide the characteristics of the 64 commonest species in terms of occurrence, frequency, distribution, abundance, bathymetric and sedimentary preferences, which constitutes most valuable information for ecosystem modelling. Megabenthic alpha diversity decreased with depth, contrary to evenness and was higher in the proximity of the river Guadiana and in highly exposed shores. We conclude that the megafauna, which is significantly quicker to collect and analyse, can provide an accurate alternative to macrofauna sampling, as their communities are shaped by the same drivers.
KeywordsSubtidal megabenthic communities Spatial scale Alpha diversity Community composition Coastal zone
The authors would like to acknowledge the crew of the RV “Diplodus” for their professionalism in conducting the sampling surveys and the IPMA technical staff for their helpful assistance in collecting and sampling the biological material. Marta M. Rufino is funded by a post-doctoral grant of IPMA, within the EU project SAFI (FP7-SPACE-2013-1, grant agreement nº 607155). Paulo Vasconcelos is funded by a post-doctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/26348/2006) awarded by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT - Portugal). Species identified in this study, with the respective abundance and biomass are archived in the PANGAEA database at the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.859802). The authors also thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that improved the revised version of the manuscript.
- Beaumont, N. J., M. C. Austen, J. P. Atkins, D. Burdon, S. Degraer, T. P. Dentinho, S. Derous, P. Holm, T. Horton, E. van Ierland, A. H. Marboe, D. J. Starkey, M. Townsend & T. Zarzycki, 2007. Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54(3): 253–265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. & V. Gomez-Rubio. 2008. Applied spatial data analysis with R UseR! series, Springer. 2nd edn. 2013, xviii+405 pp.Google Scholar
- Catalán, I. A., M. T. Jiménez, J. I. Alconchel, L. Prieto & J. L. Muñoz, 2006. Spatial and temporal changes of coastal demersal assemblages in the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain) in relation to environmental conditions. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 53(11–13): 1402–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chícharo, L., A. Chicharo, M. Gaspar, F. Alves & J. Regala, 2002a. Ecological characterization of dredged and non-dredged bivalve fishing areas off south Portugal. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 82: 41–50.Google Scholar
- Coll, M., C. Piroddi, J. Steenbeek, K. Kaschner, F. B. R. Lasram, J. Aguzzi, E. Ballesteros, C. N. Bianchi, J. Corbera, T. Dailianis, R. Danovaro, M. Estrada, C. Froglia, B. S. Galil, J. M. Gasol, R. Gertwagen, J. Gil, F. Guilhaumon, K. Kesner-Reyes, M. S. Kitsos, A. Koukouras, N. Lampadariou, E. Laxamana, C. M. L. F. de la Cuadra, H. K. Lotze, D. Martin, D. Mouillot, D. Oro, S. Raicevich, J. Rius-Barile, J. I. Saiz-Salinas, C. San Vicente, S. Somot, J. Templado, X. Turon, D. Vafidis, R. Villanueva & E. Voultsiadou, 2010. The biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: estimates, patterns, and threats. PLoS One 5(8): e11842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Costa, M., 1994. Agitação marítima na costa portuguesa. Anais do Instituto Hidrográfico 13(1994): 35–40.Google Scholar
- Cressie, N. A. C., 1991. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- De’Ath, G., 2002. Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species-environment relationships. Ecology 83(4): 1105–1117.Google Scholar
- Dolbeth, M., I. Viegas, F. Martinho, J. C. Marques & M. A. Pardal, 2006. Population structure and species dynamics of Spisula solida, Diogenes pugilator and Branchiostoma lanceolatum along a temporal-spatial gradient in the south coast of Portugal. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 66(1–2): 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dufrêne, M. & P. Legendre, 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67(3): 345–366.Google Scholar
- Ferreira, Ó., P. Ciavola, R. Taborda, M. Bairros & J. A. Dias, 2000. Sediment mixing depth determination for steep and gentle foreshores. Journal of Coastal Research 16(3): 830–839.Google Scholar
- Gaspar, M. B., F. Leitao, M. N. Santos, M. Sobral, L. Chícharo, A. Chícharo & C. C. Monteiro, 2002. Influence of mesh size and tooth spacing on the proportion of damaged organisms in the catches of the Portuguese clam dredge fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59(6): 1228–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Janssen, G. & S. Mulder, 2005. Zonation of macrofauna across sandy beaches and surf zones along the Dutch coast. Oceanologia 47(2): 265.Google Scholar
- Magalhães, F., 2001. Os sedimentos da plataforma continental portuguesa: contrastes espaciais, perspectiva temporal, potencialidades económicas. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon.Google Scholar
- Marina, P., J. L. Rueda, J. Urra, C. Salas, S. Gofas, J. E. García Raso, F. Moya, T. García, N. López-González & R. Laiz-Carrión, 2015. Sublittoral soft bottom assemblages within a marine protected area of the northern Alboran Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 95(5): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moita, I., 1986. Carta dos sedimentos superfiais. Notícia explicativa da folha SED 7 e 8. Instituto Hidrográfico, Lisboa, 18.Google Scholar
- Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, B. O’Hara, G. L., M. Simpson, P. Solymos, H. H.Stevens & H. Wagner, 2015. Vegan: community ecology Package. R package version 2.3-0. edn. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
- Pebesma, E. J. & R. S. Bivand, 2005. Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5(2): 9–13.Google Scholar
- Pires, H. N. O., 1989. O clima de Portugal, Alguns Aspectos do Clima de Agitação Marítima de Interesse para a Navegação na Costa de Portugal. In: (INMG), I. N. d. M. e. G. (ed). Lisboa, 34.Google Scholar
- R Core Team, 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
- Reyes, J. L., J. T. Martins, J. Benavente, Ó. Ferreira, F. J. Gracia, J. M. Alveirinho-Dias & F. López-Aguayo, 1999. Gulf of Cadiz beaches: A comparative response to storm events. Boletín-Instituto Español de Oceanografía 15(1–4): 221–228.Google Scholar
- Rosa, F., M. M. Rufino, Ó. Ferreira, A. Matias, A. Brito & M. Gaspar, 2013. The influence of coastal processes on inner shelf sediment distribution: the Eastern Algarve Shelf (Southern Portugal). Geologica Acta 11(1): 59–73.Google Scholar
- Rueda, J. L., C. Salas & S. Gofas, 2000. A molluscan community from coastal bioclastic bottoms in Strait of Gibraltar area. Iberus 18(1): 95–123.Google Scholar
- Wang, Y., U. Naumann, S. T. Wright & D. I. Warton, 2012. mvabund – an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution: no-noGoogle Scholar
- Warton, D. I., S. D. Foster, G. De’ath, J. Stoklosa & P. K. Dunstan, 2014. Model-based thinking for community ecology. Plant Ecology: 1–14Google Scholar