Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 780, Issue 1, pp 125–134 | Cite as

The potential ecologically sustainable yield of vendace (Coregonus albula) from large Finnish lakes

  • Timo J. MarjomäkiEmail author
  • Tapio Keskinen
  • Juha Karjalainen
EUROPEAN LARGE LAKES IV

Abstract

Vendace, Coregonus albula (L.), is the main target for commercial fishing in Finnish lakes but is notorious for its strong and unpredictable stock fluctuations. The new Fishing Act in Finland stipulates that fisheries must be managed in an ecologically, economically and socially sustainable manner based on the best available knowledge. We estimated the potential ecologically sustainable yield (ESY) for the Finnish commercial inland vendace fisheries using the available information for the biological variables affecting vendace production, and including the effect of the uncertainty and natural variability of the key variables on the accuracy and precision of our estimate. Our estimate of potential ESY with 50% likelihood is 8–13 M kg a−1. The high uncertainty in the estimate stems firstly from the fact that estimating the potential requires extrapolation of parameter values from historical time series that have not covered this potential stage of exploitation and secondly from our limited knowledge regarding the probability and duration of the long-term recession periods (i.e. several sequential very sparse year classes) typical of vendace populations. As increasing yield will require increased fishing effort, intensifying the exploitation of the vendace stocks must be accompanied by adaptive fisheries management, a well-functioning management cycle and development of management institutions promoting stakeholder participation.

Keywords

Adaptive management Ecosystem service Precaution Risk Social Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Professor Roger Jones has kindly checked the language.

References

  1. Auvinen, H., I. Kolari, A. Pesonen & J. Jurvelius, 2004. Mortality of 0+ vendace (Coregonus albula) caused by predation and trawling. Annales Zoologici Fennici 41: 339–350.Google Scholar
  2. Charles, A., 2001. Sustainable Fishery Systems. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Evans, C. D., P. J. Chapman, J. M. Clark, D. T. Monteith & M. S. Cressers, 2006. Alternative explanations for rising dissolved organic carbon export from organic soils. Global Change Biology 12: 2044–2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. FAO, 1995. Report of the expert consultation on guidelines for the responsible fisheries management. FAO Fisheries Reports 519: 1–100.Google Scholar
  5. Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, 2013. Commercial inland fishery 2012. Riista- ja kalatalous – Tilastoja 6/2013. Official Statistics of Finland – Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery. 29 p.Google Scholar
  6. Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, 2014. Recreational fishing 2012. Riista- ja kalatalous – Tilastoja 1/2014. Official Statistics of Finland – Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery. 59 p.Google Scholar
  7. Hilborn, R. & C. J. Walters, 1992. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment. Chapman and Hall, New York, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huusko, A. & P. Hyvärinen, 2005. A high harvest rate induces a tendency to generation cycling in a freshwater fish population. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hynynen, J., 2004. Anthropogenic changes in Finnish lakes during the past 150 years inferred from benthic invertebrates and their sedimentary remains. Jyväskylä Studies in Biological and Environmental Science 141: 1–45.Google Scholar
  10. IPCC, 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Jurvelius, J., R. Riikonen, T. J. Marjomäki & J. Lilja, 2000. Mortality of pike-perch (Stizostedion lucioperca), brown trout (Salmo trutta) and landlocked salmon (Salmo salar m. sebago) caught as by-catch in pelagic trawling in a lake. Fisheries Research 45: 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jurvelius, J., H. Auvinen, I. Kolari & T. J. Marjomäki, 2005. Density and biomass of smelt (Osmerus eperlanus) in five Finnish lakes. Fisheries Research 73: 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Järvi, T. H., 1919. Muikku ja muikkukannat (Coregonus albula L.) eräissä Suomen järvissä 1. Keitele. Suomen Kalatalous 5: 1–284.Google Scholar
  14. Karjalainen, J., H. Auvinen, H. Helminen, T. Marjomäki, T. Niva, J. Sarvala & M. Viljanen, 2000. Unpredictability of fish recruitment: interannual variation in young-of-the-year vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) abundance. Journal of Fish Biology 56: 837–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kettunen, M., P. Vihervaara, S. Kinnunen, D. D’Amato, T. Badura, M. Argimon & P. Ten Brink, 2012. Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic Countries. TemaNord 559: 1–290.Google Scholar
  16. Korhonen, P. K., P. Hyvärinen, V. Leppäniemi, K. Johansson & M. Ahonen, 2004. Taimen ja kuha troolin sivusaaliina Oulujärvellä. Kala- ja riistaraportteja 334: 1–20.Google Scholar
  17. Kritzberg, E. S. & S. M. Ekström, 2012. Increasing iron concentrations in surface waters – a factor behind brownification? Biogeosciences 9: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lake Päijänne LTER, 2015. Muikun ja siian poikasaikasarjat. http://www.paijanne.org/pages/fi/projektit/cornet/tuloksia.php.
  19. Lappalainen, J., H. Dörner & K. Wysujack, 2003. Reproduction biology of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) – a review. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 12: 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leslie, P. H., 1945. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33: 183–212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Marjomäki, T. J., 2004. Recruitment variability in vendace, Coregonus albula (L.), and its consequences for vendace harvesting. Jyväskylä Studies in Biological and Environmental Science 127: 1–66.Google Scholar
  22. Marjomäki, T. J. & M. Huolila, 1994. Yield, stock fluctuation, total mortality and growth of Lake Puulavesi vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) in 1984–1992. Jyväskylän yliopiston biologian laitoksen tiedonantoja 68: 37–66. (In Finnish, English summary).Google Scholar
  23. Marjomäki, T. J. & J. Kirjasniemi, 1995. Density dependent growth of vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)): a modelling analysis. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. Advances in Limnology 46: 89–96.Google Scholar
  24. Marjomäki, T. J., H. Auvinen, H. Helminen, A. Huusko, J. Sarvala, P. Valkeajärvi, M. Viljanen & J. Karjalainen, 2004. Spatial synchrony in the inter-annual population variation of vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) in Finnish inland waters. Annales Zoologici Fennici 1: 225–240.Google Scholar
  25. Marjomäki, T. J., O. Urpanen & J. Karjalainen, 2014. Two-year cyclicity in recruitment of a fish population is driven by an inter-stage effect. Population Ecology 56: 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell, M., J. Vanberg & M. Sipponen, 2012: Commercial inland fishing in member countries of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission (EIFAC): operational environments, property rights regimes and socio-economic indicators. Country profiles. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  27. Muje, K., M. Lindroos, T. J. Marjomäki & J. Karjalainen, 2004. Interlocked sustainable use of multiple fish stocks – modelling biological and socio-economic conditions in Finnish vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) fisheries. Annales Zoologici Fennici 41: 375–390.Google Scholar
  28. Nordqvist, O. 1897. Muikusta ja muikkukalastuksesta Viitasaaren pitäjässä. Suomen Kalastuslehti 6/1897: 2–10, 22–28.Google Scholar
  29. Peltonen, H., J. Ruuhijärvi, T. Malinen & J. Horppila, 1999. Estimation of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) and smelt (Osmerus eperlanus (L.)) stocks with virtual population analysis, hydroacoustics and gillnet CPUE. Fisheries Research 44: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ricker, W. E., 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 191: 1–382.Google Scholar
  31. Rockwood, L. L., 2015. Introduction to population ecology, 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell, Chishester.Google Scholar
  32. Salonen, E., 1999. The vendace stock and fisheries in Lake Inari. Boreal Environment Research 3: 307–319.Google Scholar
  33. Sarvala, J., H. Helminen, V. Saarikari, S. Salonen & K. Vuorio, 1998. Relations between planktivorous fish abundance, zooplankton and phytoplankton in three lakes of differing productivity. Hydrobiologia 363: 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sarvala, J., H. Helminen & H. Auvinen, 1999. Portrait of a flourishing freshwater fishery: Pyhäjärvi, a lake in SW-Finland. Boreal Environment Research 3: 329–345.Google Scholar
  35. Sipponen, M., 1999. The Finnish inland fisheries system. Biological research reports from the University of Jyväskylä 73: 1–81.Google Scholar
  36. Sipponen, M. & P. Valkeajärvi, 2002. The manageability of inland fisheries for Lake Päijänne, Finland: the case of co-management and self-regulation. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. Special Issues Advanced Limnology 57: 589–600.Google Scholar
  37. Sipponen, M., K. Muje, T. J. Marjomäki, P. Valkeajärvi & J. Karjalainen, 2006. Interlocked use of inland fish resources – a new management strategy under private property rights. Fisheries Management and Ecology 13: 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stokes, K. & R. Law, 2000. Fishing as an evolutionary force. Marine Ecology Progress Series 208: 307–309.Google Scholar
  39. Suuronen, P., T. Turunen, M. Kiviniemi & J. Karjalainen, 1995. Survival of vendace (Coregonus albula) escaping from a trawl cod end. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 2527–2533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Turunen, T., A. Käkelä & H. Hyvärinen, 1994. Trawling stress and mortality in undersized (<40 cm) brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Fisheries Research 19: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Valkeajärvi, P., 1983. Muikun (Coregonus albula L.) kalastus ja kannanvaihtelut Konnevedessä. Jyväskylän yliopiston Biologian laitoksen Tiedonantoja 33: 7–38.Google Scholar
  42. Valkeajärvi, P. & T. J. Marjomäki, 2004. Perch (Perca fluviatilis) as a factor in recruitment variations of vendace (Coregonus albula) in Lake Konnevesi, Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 41: 329–338.Google Scholar
  43. Valkeajärvi, P. & T. J. Marjomäki, 2013. Konneveden kalakannat vuosina 1978–2010. Riista- ja kalatalous. Tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 5(2013): 1–29.Google Scholar
  44. Valkeajärvi, P., H. Auvinen, R. Riikonen & P. Salmi, 2002. Monitoring of vendace stocks in Finland. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. Special Issues Advanced Limnology 57: 677–685.Google Scholar
  45. Valkeajärvi, P., T. J. Marjomäki & M. Raatikainen, 2012a. Päijänteen ja Tehinselän muikku- ja siikakannat 1985–2010. Riista- ja kalatalous. Tutkimuksia ja selvityksiä 3(2012): 1–35.Google Scholar
  46. Valkeajärvi, P., J. Syrjänen, A. Eloranta, J. Kivinen, K. Sivonen, O. Sivonen & I. Vesikko 2012b. Vieläkö on villejä järvitaimenia – Keski-Suomen järvitaimenhanke 2011. RKTL:n työraportteja 4/2012: 1–13.Google Scholar
  47. Viljanen, M., 1986. Biology, propagation, exploitation and management of vendace (Coregonus albula L.) in Finland. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Beihefte Ergebnisse der Limnologie 22: 73–97.Google Scholar
  48. Viljanen, M., T. Turunen & P. Väisänen, 2004. Fluctuations in year-class strength and growth of the vendace (Corefgonus albula (L.)) in the small, mesohumic, oligotrophic Suomunjärvi, a lake in eastern Finland. Anneles Zoologici Fennici 41: 241–248.Google Scholar
  49. Vuorenmaa, J., M. Forsius & J. Mannio, 2006. Increasing trends of total organic carbon concentrations in small forest lakes in Finland from 1987 to 2003. Science of the Total Environment 365: 47–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timo J. Marjomäki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tapio Keskinen
    • 2
  • Juha Karjalainen
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological and Environmental ScienceUniversity of JyväskyläUniversity of JyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Natural Resource Institute FinlandJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations