Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 796, Issue 1, pp 7–18 | Cite as

Ecological differentiation in cryptic rotifer species: what we can learn from the Brachionus plicatilis complex

  • Carmen Gabaldón
  • D. Fontaneto
  • M. J. Carmona
  • J. Montero-Pau
  • M. Serra
ROTIFERA XIV Review Paper

Abstract

In recent decades, the use of molecular techniques in rotifers has revealed the existence of many cryptic species. Although strong competition is expected among cryptic species, these species are often sympatric. Here, we present a review of sympatric cryptic rotifer species, focusing on those cases in which niche differentiation has been investigated. There are at least 42 cryptic rotifer species complexes, and species coexistence is commonly reported. Ecological differentiation among cryptic species has been detected in several complexes. However, the only available information regarding mechanisms that allow cryptic species coexistence is for several species of the Brachionus plicatilis complex: B. plicatilis, B. ibericus, B. rotundiformis and B. manjavacas. According to these studies, when species differ in body size, niche differentiation is related to abiotic and biotic factors (e.g. the differential use of resources and vulnerability to predation). In contrast, if species are almost identical in body size, their biotic niches and competitive abilities are very similar, and niche differentiation is facilitated by the differences in the species responses to fluctuating, physical environment in combination with the divergence in life-history traits related to diapause. Further studies of additional cryptic rotifer species are essential to know the generality of these conclusions.

Keywords

Brachionus plicatilis Coexistence Ecological differentiation Molecular taxonomy Morphological taxonomy Phylogenetically closely related species ecological differentiation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the former Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, co-financed with European Union FEDER funds (CGL2009-07364 and CGL2012-30779). C.G. was supported by a predoctoral contract from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (BES2010-036384) and a fellowship from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (EEBB-1-14-08222). We thank two anonymous reviewers who improved the previous versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Adler, P. B., J. Hillerislambers & J. M. Levine, 2007. A niche for neutrality. Ecology Letters 10: 95–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amarasekare, P., 2000. Coexistence of competing parasitoids on a patchily distributed host: local versus spatial mechanisms. Ecology 81: 1286–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begon, M., M. Mortimer & D. J. Thompson, 1996. Interspecific competition population ecology: a unified study of animals and plants. Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernardo, U., P. A. Pedata & G. Viggiani, 2007. Phenotypic plasticity of pigmentation and morphometric traits in Pnigalio soemius (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 97: 101–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickford, D., D. J. Lohman & N. S. Sodhi, 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birky Jr, C. W., C. Ricci, G. Melone & D. Fontaneto, 2011. Integrating DNA and morphological taxonomy to describe diversity in poorly studied microscopic animals: new species of the genus Abrochtha Bryce, 1910 (Rotifera: Bdelloidea: Philodinavidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 723–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campillo, S., E. M. García-Roger, D. Martínez-Torres & M. Serra, 2005. Morphological stasis of two species belonging to the L-morphotype in the Brachionus plicatilis species complex. Hydrobiologia Springer 546: 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campillo, S., E. M. García-Roger, M. J. Carmona & M. Serra, 2010. Local adaptation in rotifer populations. Evolutionary Ecology 25: 933–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campillo, S., M. Serra, M. J. Carmona & A. Gómez, 2011. Widespread secondary contact and new glacial refugia in the halophilic rotifer Brachionus plicatilis in the Iberian Peninsula. PloS One 6: e20986.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chase, J. & M. Leibold, 2003. Ecological Niches: linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesson, P., 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesson, P. & N. Huntly, 1989. Short-term instabilities and long-term community dynamics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4: 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chesson, P. & N. Huntly, 1997. The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities. The American Naturalist 150: 519–553.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciros-Pérez, J., M. J. Carmona & M. Serra, 2001a. Resource competition between sympatric sibling rotifer species. Limonology and Oceanography American Society of Limnology and Oceanography 46: 1511–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciros-Pérez, J., A. Gómez & M. Serra, 2001b. On the taxonomy of three sympatric sibling species of the Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera) complex from Spain, with the description of B. ibericus n. sp. Journal of Plankton Research 23: 1311–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ciros-Pérez, J., M. J. Carmona, S. Lapesa & M. Serra, 2004. Predation as a factor mediating resource competition among rotifer sibling species. Limonology and Oceanography American Society of Limnology and Oceanography 49: 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Comín, F., X. Rodó & P. Comín, 1992. Lake Gallocanta (Aragón, NE Spain): a paradigm of fluctuations at different scales of time. Limnetica 8: 79–86.Google Scholar
  18. Cracraft, J., 1989. Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation. In Otte, D. & J. Endler (eds), Speciation and its Consequences. Sinauer Associates, New York: 28–59.Google Scholar
  19. Dayrat, B., 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Derry, A. M., P. D. N. Hebert & E. E. Prepas, 2003. Evolution of rotifers in saline and subsaline lakes: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Limnology and Oceanography 48: 675–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Donner, J., 1965. Ordnung Bdelloidea (Rotatoria, Rädertiere). Bestimmungsbücher zur Bodenfauna Europas 6.Google Scholar
  22. Fontaneto, D., 2014. Molecular phylogenies as a tool to understand diversity in rotifers. International Review of Hydrobiology 99: 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fontaneto, D., W. H. De Smet & C. Ricci, 2006. Rotifers in saltwater environments, re-evaluation of an inconspicuous taxon. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK Cambridge University Press 86: 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fontaneto, D., I. Giordani, G. Melone & M. Serra, 2007a. Disentangling the morphological stasis in two rotifer species of the Brachionus plicatilis species complex. Hydrobiologia 583: 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fontaneto, D., E. A. Herniou, C. Boschetti, M. Caprioli, G. Melone, C. Ricci & T. G. Barraclough, 2007b. Independently evolving species in asexual bdelloid rotifers. PloS Biology 5: 914–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fontaneto, D., M. Kaya, E. A. Herniou & T. G. Barraclough, 2009. Extreme levels of hidden diversity in microscopic animals (Rotifera) revealed by DNA taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53: 182–189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fontaneto, D., N. Iakovenko, I. Eyres, M. Kaya, M. Wyman & T. G. Barraclough, 2011. Cryptic diversity in the genus Adineta Hudson & Gosse, 1886 (Rotifera: Bdelloidea: Adinetidae): a DNA taxonomy approach. Hydrobiologia 662: 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fontaneto, D., C. Q. Tang, U. Obertegger, F. Leasi F. & T. G. Barraclough, 2012. Different diversification rates between sexual and asexual organisms. Evolutionary Biology 39: 262–270Google Scholar
  29. Fontaneto, D., J.-F. Flot & C. Q. Tang, 2015. Guidelines for DNA taxonomy with a focus on the meiofauna. Marine Biodiversity 45: 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fu, Y., K. Hirayama & Y. Natsukari, 1991a. Morphological differences between two types of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis O.F. Müller. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 151: 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fu, Y., K. Hirayama & Y. Natsukari, 1991b. Genetic divergence between S and L type strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis O.F. Müller. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 151: 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Futuyma, D. J. & C. Mitter, 1996. Insect-plant interactions: the evolution of component communities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences The Royal Society 351: 1361–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gabaldón, C. & M. J. Carmona, 2015. Allocation patterns in modes of reproduction in two facultatively sexual cryptic rotifer species. Journal of Plankton Research 37: 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gabaldón, C., J. Montero-Pau, M. Serra & M. J. Carmona, 2013. Morphological similarity and ecological overlap in two rotifer species. PloS One 8: e57087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Gabaldón, C., M. J. Carmona, J. Montero-Pau & M. Serra, 2015a. Long-term competitive dynamics of two cryptic rotifer species: diapause and fluctuating conditions. PloS One 10: e0124406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Gabaldón, C., J. Montero-Pau, M. J. Carmona & M. Serra, 2015b. Life-history variation, environmental fluctuations and competition in ecologically similar species: modeling the case of rotifers. Journal of Plankton Research 37: 953–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gabaldón, C., M. Serra, M. J. Carmona & J. Montero-Pau, 2015c. Life-history traits, abiotic environment and coexistence: the case of two cryptic rotifer species. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 465: 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. García-Morales, A. E. & M. Elías-Gutiérrez, 2013. DNA barcoding of freshwater rotifera in Mexico: evidence of cryptic speciation in common rotifers. Molecular Ecology Resources 13: 1097–1107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gendron, R., 1987. Models and mechanisms of frequency-dependent predation. American Naturalist 130: 603–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gilbert, J. J. & E. J. Walsh, 2005. Brachionus calyciflorus is a species complex: Mating behavior and genetic differentiation among four geographically isolated strains. In Herzig, A., R. D. Gulati, C. D. Jersabek & L. May (eds), Rotifera X. Springer, Dordrecht: 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gómez, A., 2005. Molecular ecology of rotifers: from population differentiation to speciation. Hydrobiologia Springer 546: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gómez, A., M. Temprano & M. Serra, 1995. Ecological genetics of a cyclical parthenogen in temporary habitats. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8: 601–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gómez, A., M. J. Carmona & M. Serra, 1997. Ecological factors affecting gene flow in the Brachionus plicatilis complex (Rotifera). Oecologia Springer 111: 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gómez, A., M. Serra, G. Carvalho & D. H. Lunt, 2002. Speciation in ancient cryptic species complexes: evidence from the molecular phylogeny of Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Evolution The Society for the Study of Evolution 56: 1431–1444.Google Scholar
  45. Gómez, A., J. Montero-Pau, D. H. Lunt & M. Serra, 2007. Persistent genetic signatures of colonization in Brachionus manjavacas rotifers in the Iberian Peninsula. Molecular Ecology 16: 3228–3240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Grover, J., 1997. Resource Competition. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hardin, G., 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131: 1292–1297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hillbricht-Ilkowska, A., 1983. Morphological variation of Keratella cochlearis (Gosse) in Lake Biwa, Japan. Hydrobiologia 104: 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hua-Bing, L. & X. Yi-Long, 2008. Sympatric speciation in rotifers: evidence from molecular phylogenetic relationships and reproductive isolation among Brachionus calyciflorus clones. Acta Entomologica Sinica 51: 1099–1128.Google Scholar
  50. Kimpel, D., J. Gockel, G. Gerlach & O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, 2015. Population structuring in the monogonont rotifer Synchaeta pectinata: high genetic divergence on a small geographical scale. Freshwater Biology 60: 1364–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kirk, K. L., 2002. Competition in variable environments: experiments with planktonic rotifers. Freshwater Biology 47: 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Knowlton, N., 1993. Sibling species in the sea. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kutikova, L. A. & C. H. Fernando, 1995. Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas (Rotatoria) in inland waters of tropical latitudes Brachionus calyciflorus tropical in waters. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 80: 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lapesa, S., T. W. Snell, D. M. Fields & M. Serra, 2002. Predatory interactions between a cyclopoid copepod and three sibling rotifer species. Freshwater Biology Wiley Online Library 47: 1685–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lapesa, S., T. W. Snell, D. M. Fields & M. Serra, 2004. Selective feeding of Arctodiaptomus salinus (Copepoda, Calanoida) on co-occurring sibling rotifer species. Freshwater Biology 49: 1053–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leasi, F., C. Q. Tang, W. H. De Smet & D. Fontaneto, 2013. Cryptic diversity with wide salinity tolerance in the putative euryhaline Testudinella clypeata (Rotifera, Monogononta). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 168: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Leibold, M. A., 1995. The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. Ecology 76: 1371–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Leibold, M. & M. McPeek, 2006. Coexistence of the niche and neutral perspectives in community ecology. Ecology 87: 1399–1410.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Li, L., C. Niu & R. Ma, 2010. Rapid temporal succession identified by COI of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas in Xihai Pond, Beijing, China, in relation to ecological traits. Journal of Plankton Research 32: 951–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mayden, R. L., 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In Claridge, M. F., H. A. Dawah & M. R. Wilson (eds), Species: the Units of Diversity. Chapman and Hall, New York: 381–423.Google Scholar
  61. Mayr, E., 1995. Species, classification, and evolution. In Arai, R., M. Kato & Y. Doi (eds), Biodiversity and Evolution. National Science Museum Foundation, Tokyo: 3–12.Google Scholar
  62. Mills, S., J. A. Alcántara-Rodríguez, J. Ciros-Pérez, A. Gómez, A. Hagiwara, K. Hinson Galindo, C. D. Jersabek, R. Malekzadeh-Viayeh, F. Leasi, J.-S. Lee, D. B. Mark Welch, S. Papakostas, S. Riss, H. Segers, M. Serra, R. Shiel, R. Smolak, T. W. Snell, C.-P. Stelzer, C. Q. Tang, R. L. Wallace, D. Fontaneto & E. J. Walsh, 2016. Fifteen species in one: deciphering the Brachionus plicatilis species complex (Rotifera. Hydrobiologia submitted to this special issue, Monogononta) through DNA taxonomy.Google Scholar
  63. Montero-Pau, J., E. Ramos-Rodríguez, M. Serra & A. Gómez, 2011. Long-term coexistence of rotifer cryptic species. PloS One 6: e21530.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Nicholls, B. & P. A. Racey, 2006. Contrasting home-range size and spatial partitioning in cryptic and sympatric pipistrelle bats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Obertegger, U., D. Fontaneto & G. Flaim, 2012. Using DNA taxonomy to investigate the ecological determinants of plankton diversity: explaining the occurrence of Synchaeta spp. (Rotifera, Monogononta) in mountain lakes. Freshwater Biology 57: 1545–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Obertegger, U., G. Flaim & D. Fontaneto, 2014. Cryptic diversity within the rotifer Polyarthra dolichoptera along an altitudinal gradient. Freshwater Biology 59: 2413–2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ortells, R., A. Gómez & M. Serra, 2003. Coexistence of cryptic rotifer species: ecological and genetic characterisation of Brachionus plicatilis. Freshwater Biology 48: 2194–2202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ortells, R., T. W. Snell, A. Gómez & M. Serra, 2000. Patterns of genetic differentiation in resting egg banks of a rotifer species complex in Spain. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 149: 529–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pfenninger, M. & K. Schwenk, 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central 7: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Puillandre, N., M. V. Modica, Y. Zhang, L. Sirovich, M. C. Boisselier, C. Cruaud, M. Holford & S. Samadi, 2012. Large-scale species delimitation method for hyperdiverse groups. Molecular Ecology 21: 2671–2691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ricci, C., 2001. A reconsideration of the taxonomic status of Macrotrachela quadricornifera (Rotifera, Bdelloidea). Habitat 255: 273–277.Google Scholar
  72. Rodriguez-Puebla, C., A. H. Encinas, S. Nieto & J. Garmendia, 1998. Spatial and temporal patterns of annual precipitation variability over the Iberian Peninsula. International Journal of Climatology 18: 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rothhaupt, K. O., 1988. Mechanistic resource competition theory applied to laboratory experiments with zooplankton. Nature 333: 660–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rundle, H. D. & P. Nosil, 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecology Letters 8: 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sarma, S. S. S., N. Iyer & H. J. Dumont, 1996. Competitive interactions between herbivorous rotifers: importance of food concentration and initial population density. Hydrobiologia 331: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schluter, D., 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 372–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Schonrogge, K., B. Barr, J. C. Wardlaw, E. Napper, M. G. Gardner, J. Breen, G. W. Elmes & J. A. Thomas, 2002. When rare species become endangered: cryptic speciation in myrmecophilous hoverflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75: 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schröder, T. & E. J. Walsh, 2007. Cryptic speciation in the cosmopolitan Epiphanes senta complex (Monogononta, Rotifera) with the description of new species. Hydrobiologia 593: 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Segers, H., 1995. Rotifera. Vol. 2. The Lecanidae (Monogononta). Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, Vol. 6. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  80. Segers, H., 2008. Global diversity of rotifers (Rotifera) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Serra, M., A. Gómez & M. J. Carmona, 1998. Ecological genetics of Brachionus sympatric sibling species. Hydrobiologia 387: 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Snell, T. W., 1987. Sex, population dynamics and resting egg production in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 144: 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stelzer, C.-P., 2006. Competition between two planktonic rotifer species at different temperatures: an experimental test. Freshwater Biology 51: 2187–2199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Suatoni, E., S. Vicario, S. Rice, T. W. Snell & A. Caccone, 2006. An analysis of species boundaries and biogeographic patterns in a cryptic species complex: the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41: 86–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Tang, C. Q., U. Obertegger, D. Fontaneto & T. G. Barraclough, 2014. Sexual species are separated by larger genetic gaps than asexual species in rotifers. Evolution 68: 2901–2916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Tilman, D., 1982. Resource Competition and Community Structure. (MPB-17). Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  87. Tokeshi, M., 2009. Species Coexistence: ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Van Valen, L., 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Violle, C., D. R. Nemergut, Z. Pu & L. Jiang, 2011. Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion. Ecology Letters 14: 782–787.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Wallace, R. L., T. W. Snell, & H. A. Smith, 2015. Rotifer: ecology and general biology. In Thorp, J., & A. Covich (eds), Freshwater Invertebrates, Vol. I, Chap 13. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  91. Walsh, E., T. Schröder, R. Wallace & R. Rico-Martinez, 2009. Cryptic speciation in Lecane bulla (Monogononta: Rotifera) in Chihuahuan Desert waters. Verhandlungen—Internationale Vereinigung fuer Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 30: 1046–1050.Google Scholar
  92. Webb, C. O., 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. American Naturalist 156: 145–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Wellborn, G. A. & R. D. Cothran, 2007. Niche diversity in crustacean cryptic species: complementarity in spatial distribution and predation risk. Oecologia Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg 154: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Werner, E. E. & J. F. Gilliam, 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wiens, J. J. & C. H. Graham, 2005. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Xiang, X., Y. Xi, X. Wen, G. Zhang, J. Wang & K. Hu, 2011. Patterns and processes in the genetic differentiation of the Brachionus calyciflorus complex, a passively dispersing freshwater zooplankton. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 59: 386–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmen Gabaldón
    • 1
  • D. Fontaneto
    • 2
  • M. J. Carmona
    • 3
  • J. Montero-Pau
    • 4
  • M. Serra
    • 3
  1. 1.Biology Centre of the CAS, Institute of HydrobiologyČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Ecosystem StudyNational Research CouncilVerbania-PallanzaItaly
  3. 3.Institute Cavanilles of Biodiversity and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  4. 4.Institute for the Conservation and Improvement of Agricultural BiodiversityPolytechnic University of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations