Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental displacement of longnose dace, Rhinichthys cataractae (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae), reveals rapid fish avoidance of a stormwater drain in an urban watershed

  • Primary Research Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land-use change associated with human development can alter aquatic habitat and imperil aquatic species. Fish are challenged when urban streams are altered, for example for stormwater conveyance, but little is known about how such activities influence the space use of individual fish. Electronic tagging and experimental displacement of fish can be used to explore site fidelity and homing behaviour of fish and can therefore be useful for testing hypotheses about space use and habitat selection. In this study, we used experimental displacement to determine how longnose dace (LND, Rhinichthys cataractae) utilize reaches within a watershed that have varying degrees of degradation. LND were tagged using passive integrated transponders (PIT tags), transported upstream, and released either into the natural stream reach, impaired stormwater drain reach, or at their confluence. Fixed PIT antennas were used to monitor movement of the PIT-tagged fish among the three reaches for a period of 3 weeks. LND exhibited dramatic and rapid selection against the stormwater drain. No LND moved into the drain and 97% of fish transported to the drain left within 24 h. LND were actively avoiding the stormwater drain, emphasizing the need for enhancement work to improve the biological connectivity of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aymes, J. C. & J. Rives, 2009. Detection efficiency of multiplexed passive integrated transponder antennas is influenced by environmental conditions and fish swimming behaviour. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 18: 507–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bélangerz, G. & M. A. Rodríguez, 2005. Homing behaviour of stream-dwelling brook charr following experimental displacement. Journal of Fish Biology 59: 987–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, S. M., J. D. Midwood, K. M. Stamplecoskie & S. J. Cooke, 2015. Seasonal movements and residency of small-bodied fish in a north temperate urban watershed demonstrate connectivity between a stream and stormwater drain. Hydrobiologia 742: 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, A., 1987. Restoring the sinuosity of artificially straightened stream channels. Environmental Geology and Water Sciences 10: 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, N. J., K. M. Stamplecoskie, J. D. Thiem & S. J. Cooke, 2013. Comparison of detection efficiency among three sizes of half-duplex passive integrated transponders using manual tracking and fixed antenna arrays. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 33: 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Santos, T., A. Haro & S. Walk, 1996. A passive integrated transponder (PIT) tag system for monitoring fishways. Fisheries Research 28: 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, S. & M. Ladle, 2005. Diel migration and site fidelity in a stream-dwelling cyprinid, Leuciscus leuciscus. Journal of Fish Biology 50: 1117–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, S. J., S. G. Hinch, M. C. Lucas & M. Lutcavage, 2012. Biotelemetry and biologging. In Zale, A. V., D. L. Parrish & T. M. Sutton (eds), Fisheries Techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda: 819–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunjak, R. A., 1996. Winter habitat of selected stream fishes and potential impacts from land-use activity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunjak, R. A. & G. Power, 1986. Winter biology of the blacknose dace, Rhinichthys atratulus, in a southern Ontario stream. Environmental Biology of Fishes 17: 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, R. & K. N. Eshleman, 2004. Land-use change and hydrologic processes: a major focus for the future. Hydrological Processes 18: 2183–2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon, D., A. H. Arthington, M. O. Gessner, Z. I. Kawabata, D. J. Knowler, C. Lévêque & C. A. Sullivan, 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81: 163–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, E. A., H. Li & C. B. Schrek, 1983. Habitat suitability index models: longnose dace. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-82/10.33, Washington.

  • Fausch, K. D., C. E. Torgersen, C. V. Baxter & H. W. Li, 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes a continuous view of the river is needed to understand how processes interacting among scales set the context for stream fishes and their habitat. BioScience 52: 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, J. L., 1957. Movement of stream fishes in Missouri. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 85: 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, W. J. & K. M. Andrews, 2004. PIT tagging: simple technology at its best. BioScience 54: 447–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibsons, J. R. & J. H. Gee, 1972. Ecological segregation between longnose and blacknose dace (Genus Rhinichthys) in the Mink River, Manitoba. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29: 1245–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, O. T. & J. R. Karr, 1978. Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59: 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. P. & B. Jonsson, 1994. Homing of Atlantic salmon: effects of juvenile learning on transplanted post-spawners. Animal Behaviour 47: 220–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. & G. Grossman, 1987. Home range estimates for three North American stream fishes. Copeia 2: 376–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hondzo, M., 1998. Dissolved oxygen transfer at the sediment-water interface in a turbulent flow. Water Resource Research 34: 3525–3533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huey, R. B., 1991. Physiological consequences of habitat selection. American Naturalist 137: 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth, M., S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 1995. The effects of recreated instream and ecotone structures on the fish fauna of an epipotamal river. Hydrobiologia 303: 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, R. A., 1988. Habitat utilization by Hawaiian stream fishes with reference to community structure in oceanic island streams. Environmental Biology of Fishes 22: 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, J. K., T. E. Lauer & M. L. Weinman, 2006. Impacts of channelization on stream habitats and associated fish assemblages in east central Indiana. The American Midland Naturalist 156: 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, M. C. & E. Baras, 2000. Methods for studying spatial behaviour of freshwater fishes in the natural environment. Fish and Fisheries 1: 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maarschalk-Bliss, S., 2014. Seasonal variation in assemblage structure and movement of small stream fish in an urban environment. M.Sc. Thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa.

  • McDonald, J. H., 2009. Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, D. M. & T. M. Burton, 1995. Size-related habitat use by longnose dace (Rhinichtys cataractae). American Midland Naturalist 133: 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, M. J. & J. L. Meyer, 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 32: 333–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Railsback, S. F., R. H. Lamberson, B. C. Harvey & W. E. Duffy, 1999. Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish. Ecological Modelling 123: 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K. S., 1978. Channel geometry in the riffle-pool sequence. Geografiska Annaler Series A 60: 23–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, M. A., 2002. Restricted movement in stream fish: the paradigm is incomplete, not lost. Ecology 83: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J., 2003. Assessing the habitat requirements of stream fishes: an overview and evaluation of different approaches. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132: 953–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, J. M., A. Haro & R. A. Cunjak, 2000. Field test of a new method for tracking small fishes in shallow rivers using passive integrated transponder (PIT) technology. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 1326–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, I. J., 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. BioScience 41: 704–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. B. & E. J. Crossman, 1998. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Galt House Publications, Oakville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, D. L. & D. Dudgeon, 2010. Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 344–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco & J. M. Melillo, 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R. G., 1979. Homing mechanism of spawning white suckers in Wolf Lake, New York. New York Fish and Game Journal 26: 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zydlewski, G. B., A. Haro, K. G. Whalen & S. D. McCormick, 2001. Performance of stationary and portable passive transponder detection systems for monitoring of fish movements. Journal of Fish Biology 58: 1471–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Stamplecoskie for helping develop and install the telemetry arrays. In addition, we thank M. Cvetkovic, C. DellePalme, A. Da Silva, and A. Wilson for assistance in the field. We also thank E. Katic and B. Chakraburtty for continued support. Funding for this project came from a Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant and Research Tools and Infrastructure Grant to Cooke as well as generous support from the National Capital Commission Greenbelt program. Cooke is further supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program. Lennox is supported by an NSERC graduate scholarship. Data were collected in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care administered by the Carleton University Animal Care Committee (B10-12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan D. Midwood.

Additional information

Handling editor: M. Power

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crawford, C., Midwood, J.D., Lennox, R.J. et al. Experimental displacement of longnose dace, Rhinichthys cataractae (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae), reveals rapid fish avoidance of a stormwater drain in an urban watershed. Hydrobiologia 767, 197–206 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2499-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2499-3

Keywords

Navigation