, Volume 765, Issue 1, pp 317–327 | Cite as

Effects of fine wood on macroinvertebrate drift in four boreal forest streams

  • Å. Enefalk
  • E. Bergman
Primary Research Paper


Most studies of stream wood have focused on pieces ≥0.1 m diameter. However, this approach may overlook an important feature of small streams, where wood <0.1 m can constitute the majority of wood pieces. We examined the effect of fine wood (FW) on local drift of stream macroinvertebrates. The study was carried out at seven sites in four boreal forest streams, from early June to mid-August 2011. This was done by anchoring bundles of FW at each site and measuring drift upstream and downstream of each bundle. We hypothesized that FW would increase drift density, biomass and diversity of aquatic invertebrates. Ten weeks after FW addition, aquatic drift density was higher downstream than upstream of FW bundles, while drift biomass and drift diversity did not differ significantly downstream and upstream of FW.


Invertebrates Colonization FWD In-stream wood Small woody debris 



We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments which greatly improved the manuscript. We are also thankful to Professor Bror Jonsson and Professor Larry Greenberg for insightful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. We are thankful to Weronika Gorny for generous assistance in the identification of invertebrates and to Maria Malmström who provided help with all kinds of laboratory issues. We would also like to thank the landowners who kindly let us put FW in their streams and gave valuable information about liming and fishing of the streams. Funding was provided by the Department of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University.


  1. Abbe, T. B. & D. R. Montgomery, 2003. Patterns and processes of wood debris accumulation in the Queets river basin, Washington. Geomorphology 51: 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angermeier, P. L. & J. R. Karr, 1984. Relationships between woody debris and fish habitat in a small warmwater stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113: 716–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beechie, T. J. & T. H. Sibley, 1997. Relationships between channel characteristics, woody debris, and fish habitat in northwestern Washington streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126: 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beechie, T. J., M. Liermann, M. M. Pollock, S. Baker & J. Davies, 2006. Channel pattern and river-floodplain dynamics in forested mountain river systems. Geomorphology 78: 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benke, A. C., R. J. Hunter & F. K. Parrish, 1986. Invertebrate drift dynamics in a subtropical blackwater river. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 5: 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benke, A. C., K. A. Parsons & S. M. Dhar, 1991. Population and community patterns of invertebrate drift in an unregulated Coastal Plain river. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 811–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benke, A. C. & J. B. Wallace, 2003. Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers. American Fisheries Society Symposium 37: 149–177.Google Scholar
  8. Bilby, R. E. & J. W. Ward, 1989. Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size of streams in western Washington. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118: 368–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bisson, P. A., R. E. Bilby, M. D. Bryant, C. A. Dolloff, G. B. Grette, R. A. House, M. L. Murphy, K. V. Koski & J. R. Sedell, 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present and future. In Salo, E. O. & T. W. Cundy (eds.), Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions. No. 57. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle: 143–190.Google Scholar
  10. Bond, N. R., S. Sabater, A. Glaister, S. Roberts & K. Vanderkruk, 2006. Colonisation of introduced timber by algae and invertebrates, and its potential role in aquatic ecosystem restoration. Hydrobiologia 556: 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braudrick, C. A. & G. E. Grant, 2000. When do logs move in rivers? Water Resources Research 36: 571–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brittain, J. E. & T. J. Eikeland, 1988. Invertebrate drift – a review. Hydrobiologia 166: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, X., X. Wei, R. Scherer & D. Hogan, 2008. Effects of large woody debris on surface structure and aquatic habitat in forested streams, southern interior British Columbia, Canada. River Research and Applications 24: 862–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chinery, M., 1973. A field guide to the insects of Britain and Northern Europe. Collins, London.Google Scholar
  15. Clifford, H. F., 1972. A years’ study of the drifting organisms in a brown-water stream of Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 50: 975–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collier, K. J. & E. J. Bowman, 2003. Role of wood in pumice-bed streams: I: impacts of post-harvest management on water quality, habitat and benthic invertebrates. Forest Ecology and Management 177: 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Couch, C. A. & J. L. Meyer, 1992. Development and composition of the epixylic biofilm in a blackwater river. Freshwater Biology 27: 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crisp et al. in Northcote, T.G. & G. Hartman, 2008. Fishes and Forestry: Worldwide Watershed Interactions and Management. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Díez, J. R., A. Elosegi & J. Pozo, 2001. Woody debris in north Iberian streams: influence of geomorphology, vegetation, and management. Environmental Management 28: 687–698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Díez, J., A. Elosegi, E. Chauvet & J. Pozo, 2002. Breakdown of wood in the Agüera stream. Freshwater Biology 47: 2205–2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drury, D. M. & W. E. Kelso, 2000. Invertebrate colonization of woody debris in coastal plain streams. Hydrobiologia 434: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dudley, T. & N. H. Anderson, 1982. A Survey of Invertebrates Associated with Wood Debris in Aquatic Habitats. Washington State Entomological Society, Corvallis.Google Scholar
  23. Eggert, S. L. & J. B. Wallace, 2007. Wood biofilm as a food resource for stream detritivores. Limnology and Oceanography 52: 1239–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliott, J., 1968. The life histories and drifting of Trichoptera in a Dartmoor stream. The Journal of Animal Ecology 37: 615–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elliott, J. M., 1971. The distances travelled by drifting invertebrates in a Lake District stream. Oecologia 6: 350–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elliott, J., 1975. The growth rate of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) fed on maximum rations. The Journal of Animal Ecology 44: 805–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gerhard, M. & M. Reich, 2000. Restoration of streams with large wood: effects of accumulated and built-in wood on channel morphology, habitat diversity and aquatic fauna. International Review of Hydrobiology 85: 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Golladay, S. & R. Sinsabaugh, 1991. Biofilm development on leaf and wood surfaces in a boreal river. Freshwater Biology 25: 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gustafsson, P., 2011. Forest–Stream Linkages: Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) Responses to Woody Debris, Terrestrial Invertebrates and Light. Doctoral Thesis, Karlstad University.Google Scholar
  30. Hernandez, O., R. Merritt & M. Wipfli, 2005. Benthic invertebrate community structure is influenced by forest succession after clearcut logging in southeastern Alaska. Hydrobiologia 533: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffmann, A. & D. Hering, 2000. Wood-associated macroinvertebrate fauna in Central European streams. International Review of Hydrobiology 85: 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, L. B., D. H. Breneman & C. Richards, 2003. Macroinvertebrate community structure and function associated with large wood in low gradient streams. River Research and Applications 19: 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kimbirauskas, R., R. Merritt, M. Wipfli & P. Hennon, 2008. Headwater macroinvertebrate community response to riparian red alder (Alnus rubra Bong.) in southeast Alaska. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 84: 220–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lancaster, J., A. G. Hildrew & C. Gjerlov, 1996. Invertebrate drift and longitudinal transport processes in streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 572–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lester, R. E. & W. Wright, 2009. Reintroducing wood to streams in agricultural landscapes: changes in velocity profile, stage and erosion rates. River Research and Applications 25: 376–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lester, R. E., W. Wright & M. Jones-Lennon, 2007. Does adding wood to agricultural streams enhance biodiversity? An experimental approach. Marine and Freshwater Research 58: 687–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liljaniemi, P., K. Vuori, B. Ilyashuk & H. Luotonen, 2002. Habitat characteristics and macroinvertebrate assemblages in boreal forest streams: relations to catchment silvicultural activities. Hydrobiologia 474: 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malmqvist, B. & P. Sjöström, 1987. Stream drift as a consequence of disturbance by invertebrate predators. Oecologia 74: 396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Modde, T. C. & J. C. Schmulbach, 1973. Seasonal changes in the drift and benthic macroinvertebrates in the unchannelized Missouri river in south Dakota. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 52: 118–128.Google Scholar
  40. Morris, L. A., R. N. Langemeier, T. R. Russell & A. Witt Jr., 1968. Effects of main stem impoundments and channelization upon the limnology of the Missouri River, Nebraska. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 97: 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nakamura, F. & F. J. Swanson, 2003. Dynamics of wood in rivers in the context ecological disturbance. In Gregory, S., K. Boyer & A. Gurnell (eds.), The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda: 279–297.Google Scholar
  42. Nielsen, H. C. & R. W. Larimore, 1973. Establishment of invertebrate communities on log substrates in the Kaskaskia River, Illinois. Ecology 54: 366–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nilsson, A. N., 1996. Aquatic Insects of North Europe: A Taxonomic Handbook. Volume 1: Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Heteroptera, Neuroptera, Megaloptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera. Apollo Books, Vester Skerninge.Google Scholar
  44. Northcote, T. G. & G. Hartman, 2008. Fishes and Forestry: Worldwide Watershed Interactions and Management. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
  45. O’Connor, N., 1991. The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonising wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia 85: 504–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Connor, N., 1992. Quantification of submerged wood in a lowland Australian stream system. Freshwater Biology 27: 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piégay, H. & A. M. Gurnell, 1997. Large woody debris and river geomorphological pattern: examples from SE France and S. England. Geomorphology 19: 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pilotto, F., A. Bertoncin, G. L. Harvey, G. Wharton & M. T. Pusch, 2014. Diversification of stream invertebrate communities by large wood. Freshwater Biology 59: 2571–2583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pitt, D. B. & D. P. Batzer, 2011. Woody Debris as a Resource for Aquatic Macroinvertebrates in Stream and River Habitats of the Southeastern United States: A Review. In Proceedings of the 2011 Georgia Water Resources Conference, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  50. Ricciardi, A. & E. Bourget, 1998. Weight-to-weight conversion factors for marine benthic macroinvertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 163: 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robison, E. G. & R. L. Beschta, 1990. Characteristics of coarse woody debris for several coastal streams of southeast Alaska, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47: 1684–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sagar, P. & G. Glova, 1992. Invertebrate drift in a large, braided New Zealand river. Freshwater Biology 27: 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sers, B. (ed.), 2011. Swedish Electrofishing RegiSter, SERS, Svenskt ElfiskeRegiSter – Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet (SLU), Institutionen för akvatiska resurser. Available on internet at [2011-05-05].
  54. Shearer, K. A., J. W. Hayes & J. D. Stark, 2002. Temporal and spatial quantification of aquatic invertebrate drift in the Maruia River, South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 36: 529–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Siler, E. R., J. B. Wallace & S. Eggert, 2001. Long-term effects of resource limitation on stream invertebrate drift. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1624–1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smock, L. A., G. M. Metzler & J. E. Gladden, 1989. Role of debris dams in the structure and functioning of low-gradient headwater streams. Ecology 70: 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spänhoff, B. & E. Cleven, 2010. Wood in different stream types: epixylic biofilm and wood-inhabiting invertebrates in a lowland versus an upland stream. Annales de Limnologie 46: 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spänhoff, B., W. Riss, P. Jäkel, N. Dakkak & E. I. Meyer, 2006. Effects of an experimental enrichment of instream habitat heterogeneity on the stream bed morphology and chironomid community of a straightened section in a sandy lowland stream. Environmental Management 37: 247–257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Strahler, A., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 38: 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Testa, S., F. Douglas Shields & C. M. Cooper, 2011. Macroinvertebrate response to stream restoration by large wood addition. Ecohydrology 4: 631–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Townsend, C. R. & A. G. Hildrew, 1976. Field experiments on the drifting, colonization and continuous redistribution of stream benthos. The Journal of Animal Ecology 45: 759–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Triska, F. J. & K. Cromack Jr., 1980. The role of wood debris in forests and streams. In Waring, R. H. (ed.), Forests: Fresh Perspectives from Ecosystem Analysis. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis: 171–190.Google Scholar
  63. Vaz, P. G., D. R. Warren, P. Pinto, E. C. Merten, C. T. Robinson & F. C. Rego, 2011. Tree type and forest management effects on the structure of stream wood following wildfires. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vaz, P. G., E. C. Merten, D. R. Warren, C. T. Robinson, P. Pinto & F. C. Rego, 2013. Which stream wood becomes functional following wildfires? Ecological Engineering 54: 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vaz, P. G., S. Dias, P. Pinto, E. C. Merten, C. T. Robinson, D. R. Warren & F. C. Rego, 2014. Effects of burn status and conditioning on colonization of wood by stream macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Science 33: 832–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wallace, J. B. & J. R. Webster, 1996. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 115–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Wallace, J. B., J. W. Grubaugh & M. R. Whiles, 1996. Influences of Coarse Woody Debris on Stream Habitats and Invertebrate Biodiversity. Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests. General Technical Report SE-94.USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Ashville: 119–129.Google Scholar
  68. Woodall, C. W. & G. C. Liknes, 2008. Climatic regions as an indicator of forest coarse and fine woody debris carbon stocks in the United States. Carbon Balance and Management 3(5): 1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Life SciencesKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations