Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Burbot Lota lota has many desirable qualities as a study organism and as an indicator species for the quality of freshwater systems in northern latitudes (Stapanian et al., 2010). It is the only truly freshwater member of the cod family (Gadidae) and one of only two species of freshwater fish that have a circumpolar range (McPhail & Lindsey, 1970; McPhail & Paragamian, 2000). Burbot occupy the widest range of depths of all fishes found in the Laurentian Great Lakes basin (e.g., small streams to at least 300 m in Lake Superior) (Boyer et al., 1989). Burbot are among the few freshwater fishes known to communicate via vocalizations (Cott, 2013; Cott et al., 2013). Burbot are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbances, particularly dams and increased water temperatures (reviewed by Stapanian et al., 2010). However, nearly extirpated Burbot populations have recovered in some systems without stocking, following improved water quality and decreased predation from invasive species (Stapanian & Madenjian, 2007; Stapanian et al., 2006, 2008, 2010). Although external sexual dimorphism is subtle and seasonal, the testes of Burbot are very large compared with most other fishes (Cott et al., 2013) and Burbot exhibit sexual differences in range (Stapanian et al., 2013a) and uptake of contaminants (Madenjian et al., 2013, 2014; Stapanian et al., 2013b). Burbot have been shown to be ideal organisms for studies of contaminants in freshwater systems, revealing, for example that latitudinal trends in polychlorinated biphenyl congener distributions are more complex than previously thought (Stapanian et al., 2014), and like in “higher” vertebrates, androgen levels may enhance mercury elimination in teleost fish (Madenjian et al., 2015).
World-wide, many Burbot populations are threatened, endangered, or have been extirpated (reviewed by Stapanian et al., 2010). Although illegally stocked Burbot have spread in the upper Colorado River system (USA) (Gardunio et al., 2011), the species is often ignored in fish management and conservation programs (McPhail & Paragamian, 2000; Stapanian et al., 2010). This is due in part to its unpopularity as a sport and commercial fish in much of its range, despite studies indicating that Burbot meat is palatable and nutritious (Brannion, 1930; Tack et al., 1947; Staba, 1979; Addis, 1990; Stapanian & Kakuda, 2008 and references therein). Burbot ecology is poorly studied compared with that of most freshwater predators in North America and Western Europe (McPhail & Paragamian, 2000). Burbot larvae are difficult to culture for a variety of reasons, including a delicate body structure, small size at hatch, and live feed requirement for at least 5 weeks following alimentary tract development. These difficulties sometimes hamper restoring imperiled populations in some systems (e.g., Hardy & Paragamian, 2013).
In this special section of Hydrobiologia, we have assembled seven papers on diverse topics in Burbot ecology, culture, and management. They include a subset of the presentations given at the Fifth International Burbot Symposium, held during the International Congress on the Biology of Fish in Edinburgh, Scotland on 04 August 2014. Our primary objectives are to improve our understanding of Burbot and better management practices for this key species.
References
Addis, P. B., 1990. Omega-3 fatty acid content of Lake Superior fish. University of Minnesota, Minnesota Extension Service, Home Economics Publication HE-FO-5618-B, Minneapolis, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Boyer, L. F., R. A. Cooper, D. T. Long & T. M. Askew, 1989. Burbot (Lota lota) biogenic sedimentary structures in Lake Superior. Journal of Great Lakes Research 15: 174–185.
Brannion, H., 1930. The marketing of ling (burbot). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 60: 199–203.
Cott, P. A., 2013. Life History and Reproductive Ecology of a Mid-winter Spawner: The Burbot (Lota lota). Ph.D. Thesis. Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
Cott, P. A., T. A. Johnston, J. M. Gunn & D. M. Higgs, 2013. Hearing sensitivity of the burbot. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 1699–1704.
Gardunio, E. I., C. A. Myrick, R. A. Ridenour, R. M. Keith & C. J. Amadio, 2011. Invasion of illegally introduced burbot in the upper Colorado River Basin, USA. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27(S1): 36–42.
Hardy, R. & V. L. Paragamian, 2013. A synthesis of Kootenai burbot stock history and future management goals. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 1671–1679.
Madenjian, C. P., M. A. Stapanian, R. R. Rediske & J. P. O’Keefe, 2013. Sexual difference in PCB concentrations in burbot (Lota lota) from Lake Erie. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 65: 300–308.
Madenjian, C. P., M. A. Stapanian, P. A. Cott, R. R. Rediske & J. P. O’Keefe, 2014. Polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations in burbot Lota lota from Great Slave Lake are low but vary by sex. Archives in Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 66: 529–537.
Madenjian, C. P., M. A. Stapanian, P. A. Cott, D. P. Krabbenhoft, W. H. Edwards, L. M. Ogilvie & J. G. Mychek-Londer, 2015. Difference in mercury concentrations between sexes of burbot (Lota lota) suggests an important role of testosterone. Archives in Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 68: 678–688.
McPhail, J. D. & C. C. Lindsey, 1970. Freshwater fishes of northwestern Canada and Alaska. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 173.
McPhail, J. D. & V. L. Paragamian, 2000. Burbot biology and life history. In Paragamian, V. L. & D. H. Willis (eds), Burbot Biology, Ecology, and Management. Publication No. 1, American Fisheries Society, Fisheries Management Section, Bethesda, Maryland: 11–23.
Staba, E. J., 1979. Potential pharmaceutical use of the burbot (Lota lota, Linneaeus). University of Minnesota Sea Grant Program, Sea Grant Research Notes, Minneapolis.
Stapanian, M. A. & C. P. Madenjian, 2007. Evidence that lake trout served as a buffer against sea lamprey predation on burbot in Lake Erie. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:238–245.
Stapanian, M. A. & Y. Kakuda, 2008. Some effects of freezing techniques on burbot meat. In Paragamian, V. L. & D. Burnett (eds), Burbot: Ecology, Management, and Culture. American Fisheries Society, Fisheries Management Section Publication, Bethesda, Maryland: 257–270.
Stapanian, M. A., C. P. Madenjian & L. D. Witzel, 2006. Evidence that sea lamprey control led to recovery of the burbot population in Lake Erie. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135: 1033–1043.
Stapanian, M. A., C. P. Madenjian, C. Bronte, M. Ebener, R. O’Gorman & J. Stockwell, 2008. Status of burbot populations in the Laurentian Great Lakes: a synthesis. In Paragamian, V. L. & D. Burnett (eds), Burbot: Ecology, Management, and Culture. American Fisheries Society, Fisheries Management Section Publication, Bethesda, Maryland: 111–130.
Stapanian, M. A., V. L. Paragamian, C. P. Madenjian, J. R. Jackson, J. Lappalainen, M. J. Evanson & M. D. Neufeld, 2010. World-wide status of burbot and conservation measures. Fish and Fisheries 11: 34–56.
Stapanian, M. A., L. D. Witzel & A. Cook, 2013a. Temporal changes and sexual differences in spatial distribution of burbot in Lake Erie. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142: 1724–1732.
Stapanian, M. A., C. P. Madenjian, R. R. Rediske & J. P. O’Keefe, 2013b. Sexual differences in proportions of PCB congeners in burbot (Lota lota) from Lake Erie. Chemosphere 93: 1615–1623.
Stapanian, M. A., C. P. Madenjian, P. Cott, R. R. Rediske & J. P. O’Keefe, 2014. Polychlorinated biphenyl congener distributions in burbot: evidence for a latitude effect. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 33: 2448–2454.
Tack, P. I., R. Ingalls, J. F. Klocke, H. Baeder, D. C. Cederquist, E. Musser & M. A. Ohlson, 1947. Preparation, utilization, and vitamin concentrations of the burbot Lota lota maculosa (Lesherer). Michigan Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 29: 286–302.
Acknowledgments
This collection is dedicated to the memory of Adrienne Marie (Petersen) Stapanian. We miss you, Sunshine. We thank the numerous reviewers and the authors for their efforts. P. Kocovsky reviewed an earlier draft of this paper. We appreciate the cooperation and assistance we received from the Editor and Editorial Office. Use of trade, product, or firm name does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This article is Contribution 1942 of the U. S. Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Guest editors: Martin A. Stapanian & Christopher A. Myrick / Ecology, Culture, and Management of Burbot
This themed section contains an extra article available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2422-y
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stapanian, M.A., Myrick, C.A. Ecology, culture, and management of Burbot: an introduction. Hydrobiologia 757, 1–2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2380-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2380-4