Skip to main content

Succession and seasonal dynamics of the epifauna community on offshore wind farm foundations and their role as stepping stones for non-indigenous species

Abstract

In recent years, offshore wind energy in the shelf seas of the southern North Sea is experiencing a strong growth. Foundations are introduced in mainly sandy sediments, and the resulting artificial reef effect is considered one of the main impacts on the marine environment. We investigated the macrobenthic fouling community that developed on the concrete foundations of the first wind turbines built in Belgian marine waters. We observed a clear vertical zonation, with a distinction between a Telmatogeton japonicus dominated splash zone, a high intertidal zone characterised by Semibalanus balanoides, followed by a mussel belt in the low intertidal–shallow subtidal. In the deep subtidal, the species turnover was initially very high, but the community was soon dominated by few species (Jassa herdmani, Actiniaria spp. and Tubularia spp.), and only seasonal dynamics within this species assemblage were observed after 1–1½ years. Ten non-indigenous species (NIS) were found. In the intertidal, eight out of the seventeen typical intertidal species observed were NIS, while only two out of a species pool of 80 species were NIS in the deep subtidal. NIS were found to use the foundations to expand their range and strengthen their strategic position in the area.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Ambrose, R. F. & T. W. Anderson, 1990. Influence of an artificial reef on the surrounding infaunal community. Marine Biology 107: 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, M. H., M. Berggren, D. Wilhelmsson & M. C. Öhman, 2009. Epibenthic colonization of concrete and steel pilings in a cold-temperate embayment: a field experiment. Helgoland Marine Research 63: 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barros, F., A. J. Underwood & M. Lindegarth, 2001. The influence of rocky reefs on structure of benthic macrofauna in nearby soft-sediments. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52: 191–199.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boero, F. & F. Fresi, 1986. Zonation and evolution of a rocky bottom hydroid community. Marine Ecology 7: 123–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bohnsack, J. A., 1989. Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioural preference? Bulletin of Marine Science 44: 631–645.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bohnsack, J. A. & D. L. Sutherland, 1985. Artificial reef research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science 37: 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bourget, E. & M. Harvey, 1998. Spatial analysis of recruitment of marine invertebrates on arborescent substrata. Biofouling 12: 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buschbaum, C., D. Lackschewitz & K. Reise, 2012. Nonnative macrobenthos in the Wadden sea ecosystem. Ocean & Coastal Management 68: 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caine, E. A., 1987. Potential effect of floating dock communities on a South Carolina estuary. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 108: 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Claereboudt, M. R., D. Bureau, J. Cote & J. H. Himmelman, 1994. Fouling development and its effect on the growth of juvenile giant scallops (Placopecten magellanicus) in suspended culture. Aquaculture 121: 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coates, D. A., Y. Deschutter, M. Vincx & J. Vanaverbeke, 2014. Enrichment and shifts in macrobenthic assemblages in an offshore wind farm area in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Marine Environmental Research 95: 1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Connell, S. D., 2001. Urban structures as marine habitats: an experimental comparison of the composition and abundance of subtidal epibiota among pilings, pontoons and rocky reefs. Marine Environmental Research 52: 115125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Connell, J. H. & R. O. Slatyer, 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. The American Naturalist 111: 1119–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Connor, D. W. & K. Hiscock, 1996. Data collection methods. In Hiscock, K. (ed), Marine Nature Conservation Review: Rationale and Methods. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough: 51–65, 126–158.

  15. Connor, D. W., J. H. Allen, N. Golding, K. L. Howell, L. M. Lieberknecht, K. Northen & J. B. Reker, 2004. The marine habitat classification for Britain and Ireland version 04.05. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cresson, P., S. Ruitton & M. Harmelin-Vivien, 2014. Artificial reefs do increase secondary biomass production: mechanisms evidenced by stable isotopes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 509: 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daro, M. H., 1970. Etude écologique d’un brise-lames de la côte belge: 2. Biologie et développement saisonnier des espèces. Annales de la Société Royale Zoologique de Belgique 100(3): 159–189.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dean, T. A. & L. E. Hurd, 1980. Development in an estuarine fouling community: the influence of early colonists on later arrivals. Oecologia 46: 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dewsbury, B. M. & J. W. Fourqurean, 2010. Artificial reefs concentrate nutrients and alter benthic community structure in an oligotrophic, subtropical estuary. Bulletin of Marine Science 86: 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. EMU, 2008. Kentish flats offshore wind farm turbine foundation faunal colonisation diving survey. Report nr. 08/J/1/03/1034/0839/AMB/Nov 2008.

  21. Fabi, G., F. Luccarini, M. Panfili, C. Solustri & A. Spagnolo, 2002. Effects of an artificial reef on the surrounding soft-bottom community (central Adriatic Sea). ICES Journal of Marine Science 59: 343–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forteath, G. N. R., G. B. Picken, R. Ralph & J. Williams, 1982. Marine growth studies on the North Sea oil platform Montrose Alpha. Marine Ecology Progress Series 8: 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Genzano, G. N., 1998. Hydroid epizoites on Tubularia crocea and Sertularella mediterranea from the intertidal of Mar del Plata, Argentina. Biologiya Morya 24: 126–129.

  24. Gili, J. M. & R. G. Hughes, 1995. The ecology of marine benthic hydroids. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 33: 351–426.

  25. Gittenberger, A., M. Rensing, H. Stegenga & B. Hoeksema, 2010. Native and non-native species of hard substrata in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen 33: 21–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Glasby, T. M. & S. D. Connell, 2001. Orientation and position of substrata have large effects on epibiotic assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 214: 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Glasby, T. M., S. D. Connell, M. G. Holloway & C. L. Hewitt, 2007. Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? Marine Biology 151: 887–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grossman, G. D., G. P. Jones & W. Seaman, 1997. Do artificial reefs increase regional fish production? A review of existing data. Fisheries 22: 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Høisæter, T., 1989. Biological notes on some Pyramidellidae (Gastropoda: Opistobranchia) from Norway. Sarsia 74: 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horn, H. S., 1974. The ecology of secondary succession. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Houziaux, J.-S., F. Kerckhof, K. Degrendele, M. Roche, A. Norro, 2008. The Hinder Banks: yet an important area for the Belgian marine biodiversity? Belgian Science Policy D/2008/1191/7.

  32. Joschko, T. J., B. H. Buck, L. Gutow & A. Schröder, 2008. Colonisation of an artificial hard substrate by Mytilus edulis in the German Bight. Marine Biology Research 4: 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kerckhof, F., J. Haelters & S. Gollasch, 2007. Alien species in the marine and brackish ecosystem: the situation in Belgian waters. Aquatic Invasions 2: 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kerckhof, F., B. Rumes, T. J. Jacques, S. Degraer & A. Norro, 2010. Early development of the subtidal marine biofouling on a concrete offshore windmill foundation on the Thornton Bank (Southern North Sea): first monitoring results. International Journal of the Society for Underwater Technology 29: 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Knott, N. A., A. J. Underwood, M. G. Chapman & T. M. Glasby, 2004. Epibiota on vertical and on horizontal surfaces on natural reefs and on artificial structures. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84: 1117–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koehl, M. A. R., 2007. Mini review: hydrodynamics of larval settlement into fouling communities. Biofouling 23: 357–368.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Krone, R., L. Gutow, T. J. Joschko & A. Schröder, 2013. Epifauna dynamics at an offshore foundations—Implications of future wind power farming in the North Sea. Marine Environmental Research 85: 1–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Langhamer, O., 2012. Artificial reef effect in relation to offshore renewable energy conversion: state of the art (review article). The Scientific World Journal. doi:10.1100/2012/386713. (article ID 386713).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Leewis, R. J., G. W. N. M. van Moorsel & H. W. Waardenburg, 2000. Shipwrecks on the Dutch Continental Shelf as artificial reefs. In Jensen, A. C., K. J. Collins & A. P. M. Lockwood (eds), Artificial reefs in European Seas. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht: 419–434.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Leonhard, S.B. & J. Pedersen, 2006. Benthic communities at Horns Rev before, during and after construction of Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm. Final report 2005. Udarbejdet af Bio/consult as for ELSAM Engineering, 96.

  41. Lindahl, U., M. C. Öhman & C. K. Schelten, 2001. The 1997/1998 mass mortality of corals: effects on fish communities on a Tanzanian coral reef. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42: 127–131.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lindeboom, H., H. J. Kouwenhoven, M. J. N. Bergman, S. Bouma, S. Brasseur, R. Daan, R. C. Fijn, D. de Haan, S. Dirksen, R. van Hal, R. H. R. Lambers, R. ter Hofstede, K. L. Krijgsveld, M. Leopold & M. Scheidat, 2011. Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zone; a compilation. Environmental Research Letters 6: 035101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lintas, C. & R. Seed, 1994. Spatial variation in the fauna associated with Mytilus edulis on a wave-exposed rocky shore. Journal of Molluscan studies 60: 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Little, C. & J. A. Kitching, 1996. The Biology of Rocky Shores. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Maar, M., K. Bolding, J. K. Petersen, J. L. S. Hansen & K. Timmermann, 2009. Local effects of blue mussels around turbine foundations in an ecosystem model of Nysted off-shore wind farm, Denmark. Journal of Sea Research 62: 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. MacLeod, P. & I. Valiela, 1975. The effects of density and mutual interference by a predator: a laboratory study of predation by the nudibranch Coryphella rufibranchialis on the hydroid Tubularia larynx. Hydrobiologia 47: 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nelson, L. N. & S. F. Craig, 2011. Role of the sea anemone Metridium senile in structuring a developing subtidal fouling community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 421: 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens & H. Wagner, 2013. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-7. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.

  49. Osman, R. W., 1977. The establishment and development of a marine epifaunal community. Ecological Monographs 47: 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Page, H. M., J. E. Dugan, C. S. Culver & J. C. Hoesterey, 2006. Exotic invertebrate species on offshore oil platforms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 325: 101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. People, J., 2006. Mussel beds on different types of structures support different macroinvertebrate assemblages. Austral Ecology 31: 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Petersen, K. J. & T. Malm, 2006. Offshore windmill farms: threats or possibilities to the marine environment. Ambio 35: 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pickering, H. & D. Whitmarsh, 1997. Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research 31: 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pihl, L. & H. Wennhage, 2002. Structure and diversity of fish assemblages on rocky and soft bottom shores on the Swedish west coast. Journal of Fish Biology 61: 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. R Core Team, 2012. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (ISBN 3-900051-07-0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.

  56. Reubens, J., S. Degraer & M. Vincx, 2011. Aggregation and feeding behaviour of pouting (Trisopterus luscus) at wind turbines in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Fisheries Research 108: 223–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Reubens, J., U. Braeckman, J. Vanaeverbeke, C. van Colen, S. Degraer & M. Vincx, 2013. Aggregation at windmill artificial reefs: CPUE of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and pouting (Trisopterus luscus) at different habitats in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Fisheries Research 139: 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Robertson, R., 1963. Wentletraps (Epitoniidae) feeding on sea anemones and corals. Journal of Molluscan Studies 53: 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ruiz, G. M., A. L. Freestone, P. W. Fofonoff & C. Simkanin, 2009. Habitat distribution and heterogeneity in marine invasion dynamics: The importance of hard substrate and artificial structure. In Wahl, M. (ed.), Marine Hard Bottom Communities: Patterns, Dynamics, Diversity and Change, Vol. 206., Ecological studies Springer, Heidelberg: 321–332.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Russ, G. R., 1982. Overgrowth in a marine epifaunal community: competitive hierarchies and competitive networks. Oecologia 53: 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ryland, J. S., 1967. Polyzoa. Oceanography and marine biology: an annual review 5: 343–369.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Schröder, A., C. Orejas & T. Joschko, 2006. Benthos in the vicinity of the piles: FINO 1 (North Sea). In Köller, J., J. Köppel & W. Peters (eds), Offshore Wind Energy. Research on Environmental Impacts. Springer, Heidelberg: 185–200.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Shaw, S., M. J. Cremers & G. Palmers, 2002. Enabling Offshore Wind Developments. European Wind Energy Association, Brussels: 132.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Suzuki, R. & S. Hidetoshi, 2011. pvclust: hierarchical clustering with P-values via multiscale bootstrap resampling. R package version 1.2-2. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pvclust.

  65. Svane, I. & J. K. Petersen, 2001. On the problems of epibiosis, fouling and artificial reefs, a review. Marine Ecology 22: 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Whomersley, P. & G. B. Picken, 2003. Long-term dynamics of fouling communities found on offshore installations in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83: 897–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilhelmsson, D., T. Malm & M. C. Öhman, 2006. The influence of offshore windpower on demersal fish. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63(5): 775–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Witman, J. D., 1985. Biological disturbance, and rocky subtidal community structure in New England. Ecological Monographs 55: 421–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zintzen, V., 2007. Biodiversity of shipwrecks from the Southern Bight of the North Sea. Phd thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, pp 337 + annex.

  70. Zintzen, V., A. Norro, C. Massin & J. Mallefet, 2008. Temporal variation of Tubularia indivisa (Cnidaria, Tubulariidae) and associated epizoites on artificial habitat communities in the North Sea. Marine Biology 153: 405–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this paper acknowledge C-Power for the willing cooperation throughout the monitoring, in fulfilment of the monitoring requirements of their environmental permit. Field work could not have been completed without the help and smooth operation provided by the officers and crew of the RV Belgica, owned by the Belgian Ministry of Science Policy and coordinated by OD Nature, and the RV Zeeleeuw, property of the Flemish government and coordinated by VLIZ. The sampling could not have been completed without the help of Jean-Sébastien Houziaux and (in alphabetical order) K. Deneudt, F. Francken, P. Hendriks, G. Jones, G. Lacroix, C. Mahieu, J. Mallefet, D. Marsham, L. Meirlaen, R. Olemans, F. Pasotti, R. Picavet, J. Pire, G. Rooms, A. Simon, H. Tourneur, M. Vanespen, I. Vosselman, A. Witkowski and V. Woit.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilse De Mesel.

Additional information

Guest editors: Steven Degraer, Jennifer Dannheim, Andrew B. Gill, Han Lindeboom & Dan Wilhelmsson / Environmental impacts of offshore wind farms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Mesel, I., Kerckhof, F., Norro, A. et al. Succession and seasonal dynamics of the epifauna community on offshore wind farm foundations and their role as stepping stones for non-indigenous species. Hydrobiologia 756, 37–50 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2157-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Marine fouling
  • Artificial reef
  • Succession
  • Non-indigenous species