Stormwater ponds can contain comparable biodiversity to unmanaged wetlands in urban areas
Urban freshwaters provide a range of ecosystem services, including stormwater management, water treatment, biodiversity, and aesthetics. Management of freshwaters should aim to maximise as many of these services as possible, but managers are often focused on individual services. To test for the biodiversity value of stormwater management ponds (SMPs) in Ottawa, Canada, 20 SMPs were surveyed for macroinvertebrates using standardised sampling techniques. These were compared against 10 wetlands that were not managed for stormwater control (a combination of ornamental lakes, natural lakes, and nature reserves) in and around the same urban area (a total of 30 ponds). Natural wetlands and SMPs were very different in their water chemistry, which was correlated with the proportion of urban land use within 1 km of the site, with higher conductivity in SMPs with increasing urban land cover (P = 0.046). Despite this, natural wetlands and the richest SMPs contained similar levels of biodiversity and similar macroinvertebrate community structure. This study highlights that stormwater management can occur alongside biodiversity enhancement in urban areas, but correlations between urban land use, water chemistry, and the structure of biological communities suggests that run-off from urban areas is likely a major factor in structuring biological communities in built-up regions.
KeywordsUrban Wetland Invertebrate Diversity Stormwater Canada
- Ackley, J. W. & P. A. Meylan, 2010. Watersnake Eden: use of stormwater retention ponds by mangrove salt marsh snakes (Nerodia clarkii compressicauda) in urban Florida. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 5: 17–22.Google Scholar
- Barton, K., 2013. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn, R package version 1.9.13.
- Downing, J. A., Y. T. Prairie, J. J. Cole, C. M. Duarte, L. J. Tranvik, R. G. Striegel, W. H. McDowell, P. Kortelainen, N. F. Caraco, J. M. Melack & J. J. Middelburg, 2006. The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds and impoundments. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 2388–2397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Downing, J. A., J. J. Cole, J. J. Middelburg, R. G. Striegel, C. M. Duarte, P. Kortelainen, Y. T. Prairie & K. A. Laube, 2008. Sediment organic carbon burial in agriculturally eutrophic impoundments over the last century. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22:GB1018.Google Scholar
- Dudgeon, D., A. H. Arthington, M. O. Gessner, Z. I. Kawabata, D. J. Knowler, C. Lévêque, R. J. Naiman, A. H. Prieur-Richard, D. Soto, M. L. J. Stiassny & C. A. Sullivan, 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81: 163–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Environment Agency and Ponds Conservation Trust, 2002. A guide to monitoring the ecological quality of ponds and canals using PSYM. PCTPR, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Goertzen, D. & F. Suhling, 2013. Promoting dragonfly diversity in cities: major determinants and implications for urban pond design. Journal of Insect Conservation 17: 399–409.Google Scholar
- Jones, F. C., K. M. Somers, B. Craig & T. B. Reynoldson, 2007. Ontario Benthos Biomonitoring Network: Protocol Manual. Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto.Google Scholar
- Natural Resources Canada, 2009. Geobase: Land Cover, circa 2000-Vector. Center for Topographic Information, Earth Sciences Sector. Natural Resources Canada, Sherbrooke.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team, 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
- Sala, O. E., F. S. Chapin, III, J. J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L. F. Huenneke, R. B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D. M. Lodge, H. A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, iacute, N. L. Poff, M. T. Sykes, B. H. Walker, M. Walker & D. H. Wall, 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774.Google Scholar
- Sanderson, E. W., M. Jaiteh, M. A. Levy, K. H. Redford, A. V. Wannebo & G. Woolmer, 2002. The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild: the human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. Bioscience 52: 891–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stoddard, J. L., D. S. Jeffries, A. Lukewille, T. A. Clair, P. J. Dillon, C. T. Driscoll, M. Forsius, M. Johannessen, J. S. Kahl, J. H. Kellogg, A. Kemp, J. Mannio, D. T. Monteith, P. S. Murdoch, S. Patrick, A. Rebsdorf, B. L. Skjelkvale, M. P. Stainton, T. Traaen, H. van Dam, K. E. Webster, J. Wieting & A. Wilander, 1999. Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe. Nature 401: 575–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Whitehead, P. G., R. W. Battarbee, J. Crossman, J. A. Elliott, R. Wilby, D. T. Monteith & M. Kernan, 2012. River and lake water quality: future trends. NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/17812.