Behavioral studies have often examined parental care by measuring phenotypic plasticity of behavior within a species. Phylogenetic studies have compared parental care among species, but only at broad categories (e.g., care vs. no care). Here we provide a detailed account that integrates phylogenetic analysis with quantitative behavioral data to better understand parental care behavior in the Cuatro Ciénegas cichlid, Herichthys minckleyi. We found that H. minckleyi occurs in a clade of sexually monochromatic or weakly dichromatic monogamous species, but that male and female H. minckleyi have dramatically different reproductive coloration patterns, likely as a result of sexual selection. Furthermore, we found that males are polygynous; large males guard large territories, and smaller males may attempt alternative mating tactics (sneaking). Finally, compared to the closely related monogamous Rio Grande cichlid, H. cyanoguttatus, males of H. minckleyi were present at their nests less often and performed lower rates of aggressive offspring defense, and females compensated for the absence of their mates by performing higher levels of offspring defense. Body color, mating system, and parental care in H. minckleyi appear to have evolved after it colonized Cuatro Ciénegas, and are likely a result of evolution in an isolated, stable environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Ah-King, M., C. Kvarnemo & B. S. Tullberg, 2005. The influence of territoriality and mating system on the evolution of male care: a phylogenetic study on fish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 371–382.
Alonzo, S. H., 2010. Social and coevolutionary feedbacks between mating and parental investment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 99–108.
Artigas Azas, J. M., 1992. The Herichthys labridens species group. The Cichlid Room Companion. http://www.cichlidae.com/article.php?id=6. Viewed 13 June 2011.
Artigas Azas, J. M., 1994a. La Mojarra del Desierto: Herichthys minckleyi. The Cichlid Room Companion. Viewed 18 May 2014.
Artigas Azas, J. M., 1994b. La Mojarra de dos colores: Herichthys bartoni. Cichlid News 4: 10–12, 18–20.
Artigas Azas, J. M., 1996. Herichthys labridens, La Mojarra Caracolera. The Cichlid Room Companion. Viewed 18 May 2014.
Artigas Azas, J. M., 2006. La Mojarra de Tamasopo – Herichthys tamasopoensis. Cichlid News 15: 18–25.
Badyaev, A. V. & G. E. Hill, 2003. Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 27–49.
Baerends, G. P. & J. M. Baerends-van Roon, 1950. An introduction to the study of the ethology of cichlid fishes. Behaviour (Supplement) 1: 1–242.
Balshine-Earn, S., 1995. The costs of parental care in Galilee St Peter’s fish, Sarotherodon galilaeus. Animal Behaviour 50: 1–7.
Barlow, G. W., 1974. Contrasts in social behavior between Central American cichlid fishes and coral-reef surgeon fishes. American Zoologist 14: 9–34.
Barlow, G. W., 1976. The Midas cichlid in Nicaragua. In Thorson, T. B. (ed.), Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes. School of Life Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska: 333–358.
Barlow, G. W., 1983. Do gold Midas cichlid fish win fights because of their color, or because they lack normal coloration? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13: 197–204.
Barlow, G. W., 1991. Mating systems among cichlid fishes. In Keenleyside, M. H. A. (ed.), Cichlid Fishes: Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution. Chapman and Hall University Press, Cambridge: 173–190.
Barlow, G. W., 2000. The Cichlid Fishes, Nature’s Grand Experiment in Evolution. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA.
Baylis, J. R., 1981. The evolution of parental care in fishes, with reference to Darwin’s rule of male sexual selection. Environmental Biology of Fishes 6: 223–251.
Benjamini, Y. & Y. Hochberg, 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57: 289–300.
Brown, W. H., 1953. Introduced fish species of the Guadalupe River Basin. Texas Journal of Science 2: 245–251.
Brown, J. M., S. M. Hedtke, A. R. Lemmon & E. M. Lemmon, 2010. When trees grow too long: investigating the causes of highly inaccurate Bayesian branch length estimates. Systematic Biology 59: 145–161.
Buchanan, T. M., 1971. The reproductive ecology of the Rio Grande Cichlid, Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum (Baird and Girard). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
Chakrabarty, P., M. P. Davis, R. Berquist, K. Gledhill, J. Sparks & L. Frank, 2011a. Evolution of the light organ system in ponyfishes (Teleostei:Leiognathidae). Journal of Morphology 272: 704–721.
Chakrabarty, P., M. P. Davis, W. L. Smith, Z. H. Baldwin & J. S. Sparks, 2011b. Is sexual selection driving diversification of the bioluminescent ponyfishes (Teleostei: Leiognathidae)? Molecular Ecology 20: 2818–2834.
Cohen, A. E., D. A. Hendrickson, C. Parmesan & J. C. Marks, 2005. Habitat segregation among trophic morphs of the Cuatro Cienégas cichlid (Herichthys minckleyi). Hidrobiológica 15: 169–181.
Cunningham, E. J. A. & T. R. Birkhead, 1998. Sex roles and sexual selection. Animal Behaviour 56: 1311–1321.
Davies, N. B., 1989. Sexual conflict and the polygamy threshold. Animal Behaviour 38: 226–234.
De La Maza-Benignos, M. & M. D. L. Lozano-Vilano, 2013. Description of three new species of the genus Herichthys (Perciformes: Cichlidae) from eastern Mexico, with redescription of H. labridens, H. steindachneri, and H. pantostictus. Zootaxa 3734: 101–129.
De la Maza-Benignos, M., C. P. Ornelas-García, M. de Lourdes Lozano-Vilano, M. E. García-Ramírez & I. Doadrio, 2014. Phylogeographic analysis of genus Herichthys (Perciformes: Cichlidae), with descriptions of Nosferatu new genus and H. tepehua n. sp. Hydrobiologia: 1–31.
Dijkstra, P. D., O. Seehausen & T. G. G. Groothuis, 2005. Direct male-male competition can facilitate invasion of new colour types in Lake Victoria cichlids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 58: 136–143.
Emlen, S. T. & L. W. Oring, 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.
Fink, W. L., 1982. The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 8: 254–264.
Garland, T. & S. C. Adolph, 1994. Why not to do 2-species comparative studies – limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiological Zoology 67: 797–828.
Gittleman, J. L., 1989. The comparative approach in ethology: aims and limitations. In Bateson, P. P. G. & P. H. Klopfer (eds), Perspectives in Ethology, Vol. 8. Plenum Press, New York: 55–83.
Gonzalez-Voyer, A. & N. Kolm, 2010. Parental care and investment. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0021907.
Gonzalez-Voyer, A., J. L. Fitzpatrick & N. Kolm, 2008. Sexual selection determines parental care patterns in cichlid fishes. Evolution 62: 2015–2026.
Goodwin, N. B., S. Balshine & J. D. Reynolds, 1998. Evolutionary transitions in parental care in cichlid fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 265: 2265–2272.
Gross, M. R., 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 92–98.
Gross, M. R., 2005. The evolution of parental care. Quarterly Review of Biology 80: 37–45.
Gross, M. R. & R. C. Sargent, 1985. The evolution of male and female parental care in fishes. American Zoologist 25: 807–822.
Grüter, C. & B. Taborsky, 2005. Sex ratio and the sexual conflict about brood care in a bi-parental mouthbrooder. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 58: 44–52.
Hofmann, H. A., M. E. Benson & R. D. Fernald, 1999. Social status regulates growth rate: consequences for life-history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 14171–14176.
Hulsey, C. D., J. Marks, D. A. Hendrickson, C. A. Williamson, A. E. Cohen & M. J. Stephens, 2006. Feeding specialization in Herichthys minckleyi: a trophically polymorphic fish. Journal of Fish Biology 68: 1399–1410.
Hulsey, C. D., P. R. Hollingsworth, Jr. & J. A. Fordyce, 2010. Temporal diversification of Central American cichlids. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 279.
Itzkowitz, M., 1984. Parental division of labor in a monogamous fish. Behaviour 89: 251–261.
Itzkowitz, M., 1985. Sexual differences in offspring defense in a monogamous cichlid fish. Zeitschrift Tierpsychologie 70: 247–255.
Itzkowitz, M. & J. Nyby, 1982. Field observations of parental behavior of the Texas cichlid, Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum. American Midland Naturalist 108: 364–368.
IUCN, 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2013.2. www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 31 May 2014.
Katoh, R., H. Munehara & M. Kohda, 2005. Alternative male mating tactics of the substrate brooding cichlid Telmatochromis temporalis in Lake Tanganyika. Zoological Science 22: 555–561.
Keenleyside, M. H. A., 1983. Mate desertion in relation to adult sex ratio in the biparental cichlid fish Herotilapia multispinosa. Animal Behaviour 31: 683–688.
Keenleyside, M. H. A., 1991. Parental care. In Keenleyside, M. H. A. (ed.), Cichlid Fishes: Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution. Chapman and Hall University Press, Cambridge: 191–208.
Keenleyside, M. H. A. & R. W. Mackereth, 1992. Effects of loss of male parent on brood survival in a biparental cichlid fish. Environmental Biology of Fishes 34: 207–212.
Keenleyside, M. H. A., R. C. Bailey & V. H. Young, 1990. Variation in the mating system and associated parental behaviour of captive and free-living Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum (Pisces, Cichlidae). Behaviour 112: 202–221.
Kidd, M. R., N. Duftner, S. Koblmüller, C. Sturmbauer & H. A. Hofmann, 2012. Repeated parallel evolution of parental care strategies within Xenotilapia, a genus of cichlid fishes from Lake Tanganyika. PLoS One 7: e31236.
Kokko, H. & M. D. Jennions, 2008. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 919–948.
Kokko, H. & M. D. Jennions, 2012. Sex differences in parental care. In Royle, N., P. T. Smiseth & M. Kölliker (eds), The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 101–116.
Kokko, H., H. Klug & M. D. Jennions, 2012. Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment. Ecology Letters 15: 1340–1351.
Konings, A., 1989. Cichlids from Central America. TFH Publications, Neptune, NJ.
Konings, A., 1994. An extremely rare colour morph of Herichthys minckleyi. The Cichlid Yearbook, Vol. 4. Cichlid Press, St. Leon-Rot: 68–69.
Kornfield, I. L. & R. K. Koehn, 1975. Genetic variation and speciation in New World cichlids. Evolution 29: 427–437.
Kornfield, I. & J. N. Taylor, 1983. A new species of polymorphic fish, Cichlasoma minckleyi, from Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico (Teleostei: Cichladae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 96: 253–269.
Kornfield, I., D. C. Smith & P. S. Gagnon, 1982. The cichlid fish of Cuatro Ciénegas, Mexico: direct evidence of conspecificity among distinct trophic morphs. Evolution 36: 658–664.
Kvarnemo, C. & I. Ahnesjö, 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 404–408.
Lampert, L. & E. Hanneman, 2002. Herichthys deppii (Heckel, 1840): rediscovering a lost species. Buntbarsche Bulletin 208: 10.
Lehtonen, T. K., B. B. M. Wong, K. Lindström & A. Meyer, 2011a. Species divergence and seasonal succession in rates of mate desertion in closely related Neotropical cichlid fishes. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 65: 607–612.
Lehtonen, T. K., B. B. M. Wong, P. A. Svensson & A. Meyer, 2011b. Adjustment of brood care behaviour in the absence of a mate in two species of Nicaraguan crater lake cichlids. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 65: 613–619.
Lewis, P. O., 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50: 913–925.
Liem, K. E. & L. S. Kaufman, 1984. Intraspecific macroevolution: functional biology of the polymorphic cichlid species Cichlasoma minckleyi. In Echelle, A. A. & I. Kornfield (eds), Evolution of Species Flocks. University of Maine Press, Orono, ME: 203–215.
Losos, J. B., 1999. Uncertainty in the reconstruction of ancestral character states and limitations on the use of phylogenetic comparative methods. Animal Behaviour 58: 1319–1324.
Maddison, W. P. & D. R. Maddison, 2011. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, Version 2.75 http://mesquiteproject.org.
Mank, J. E., D. E. L. Promislow & J. C. Avise, 2005. Phylogenetic perspectives in the evolution of parental care in ray-finned fishes. Evolution 59: 1570–1578.
Martin, T. R., 2000. Range extension for Rio Grande cichlid Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum (Pisces: Cichlidae) in Texas. Texas Journal of Science 52: 173–175.
Martins, E. P., 1996. Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior. Oxford University Press, New York.
McDonald, J. H., 2009. Handbook of Biological Statistics, 2nd ed. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, MD.
McKaye, K. R., 1977. Competition for breeding sites between the cichlid fishes of Lake Jiloá, Nicaragua. Ecology 58: 291–302.
McKaye, K. R., 1986. Mate choice and size assortative pairing by the cichlid fishes of Lake Jiloá, Nicaragua. Journal of Fish Biology 29: 135–150.
McMahan, C. D., A. D. Geheber & K. R. Piller, 2010. Molecular systematics of the enigmatic Middle American genus Vieja. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 1293–1300.
Miller, R. M., W. L. Minckleyi & S. M. Norris, 2005. Freshwater Fishes of Mexico. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Minckley, W. L., 1969. Environments of the bolson of Cuatro Ciénegas, Coahuila, Mexico, with special reference to the aquatic biota. Texas Western Press, The University of Texas at El Paso, Science Series 2: 1–65.
Mock, D. W. & M. Fujioka, 1990. Monogamy and long-term pair bonding in vertebrates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 39–43.
Moore, A. J. & P. J. Moore, 1999. Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 266: 711–716.
Morley, J. I. & S. Balshine, 2002. Faithful fish: territory and mate defence favour monogamy in an African cichlid fish. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 52: 326–331.
Nagoshi, M., 1987. Survival of broods under parental care and parental roles of the cichlid fish, Lamprologus toae, in Lake Tanganyika. Ichthyological Research 34: 71–75.
Neil, S. J., 1984. Field studies of the behavioral ecology and agonistic behavior of Cichlasoma meeki (Pisces: Cichlidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 10: 59–68.
Nelson, J. S., 2006. Fishes of the World, 4th ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Nunney, L. & K. A. Campbell, 1993. Assessing minimum viable population size: demography meets population genetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 234–239.
O’Connell, L. A., B. J. Matthews & H. A. Hofmann, 2012. Isotocin regulates paternal care in a monogamous cichlid fish. Hormones and Behavior 61: 725–733.
O’Hara, R. B. & D. J. Kotze, 2010. Do not log-transform count data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1: 118–122.
Oldfield, R. G., 2009. Captive breeding observations support the validity of a recently described cichlid species in Lake Apoyo, Nicaragua. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Occasional Papers 741: 1–14.
Oldfield, R. G., 2011. Aggression and welfare in a common aquarium fish, the Midas cichlid. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 14: 340–360.
Oldfield, R. G. & H. A. Hofmann, 2011. Neuropeptide regulation of social behavior in a monogamous cichlid fish. Physiology and Behavior 102: 296–303.
Oldfield, R. G., R. Harris, D. A. Hendrickson & H. A. Hofmann, 2013. Vasotocin and androgen pathways are associated with mating system variation in North American cichlid fishes. Hormones and Behavior 64: 44–52.
Olson, V. A., T. J. Webb, R. P. Freckleton & T. Székely, 2009. Are parental care trade-offs in shorebirds driven by parental investment or sexual selection? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 672–682.
Podos, J., 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s finches. Nature 409: 185–188.
Price, J. J., M. K. Clapp & K. E. Omland, 2011. Where have all the trees gone? The declining use of phylogenies in animal behaviour journals. Animal Behaviour 81: 667–670.
Rambaut, A. & A. J. Drummond, 2009. Tracer v1.5. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer. Viewed 28 February 2013.
Reis, R. E., S. O. Kullander & C. J. Ferraris, Jr. (eds), 2003. Check List of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. Edipucrs Publisher, Porto Alegre.
Reynolds, J. D., 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 68–72.
Rogers, W., 1987. Sex ratio, monogamy and breeding success in the Midas cichlid (Cichlasoma citrinellum). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 21: 47–51.
Ronquist, F. & J. P. Huelsenbeck, 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
Royle, N. J., P. T. Smiseth & M. Kölliker, 2012. The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sage, R. D. & R. K. Selander, 1975. Trophic radiation through polymorphism in cichlid fishes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72: 4669–4673.
Salzburger, W., 2009. The interaction of sexually and naturally selected traits in the adaptive radiations of cichlid fishes. Molecular Ecology 18: 169–185.
Schliewen, U., K. Rassmann, M. Markmann, J. Markert, T. Kocher & D. Tautz, 2001. Genetic and ecological divergence of a monophyletic cichlid species pair under fully sympatric conditions in Lake Ejagham, Cameroon. Molecular Ecology 10: 1471–1488.
Seehausen, O., P. J. Mayhew & J. J. M. van Alphen, 1999. Evolution of colour patterns in East African cichlid fish. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 514–534.
Shine, R., 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Quarterly Review of Biology 64: 419–461.
Slatkin, M., 1984. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 622–630.
Smith, W. L., P. Chakrabarty & J. S. Sparks, 2008. Phylogeny, taxonomy, and evolution of Neotropical cichlids (Teleostei:Cichlidae:Cichlinae). Cladist 24: 1–17.
Staeck, W. & H. Linke, 1985. American Cichlids II: Large Cichlids, A Handbook for Their Identification, Care, and Breeding. Tetra-Verlag, Melle, Germany.
Swanson, B. O., A. C. Gibb, J. C. Marks & D. A. Hendrickson, 2003. Trophic polymorphism and behavioral differences decrease intraspecific competition in a cichlid, Herichthys minckleyi. Ecology 84: 1441–1446.
Swanson, B. O., A. C. Gibb, J. C. Marks & D. A. Hendrickson, 2005. Do movement patterns differ between laboratory and field suction feeding behaviors in a Mexican cichlid? Environmental Biology of Fishes 74: 201–208.
Taborsky, M., 1994. Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Advances in the Study of Behavior 23: 1–100.
Taylor, J. N. & R. R. Miller, 1983. Cichlid fishes (genus Cichlasoma) of the Rio Panuco Basin, eastern Mexico, with description of a new species. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas 104: 1–24.
Thomas, G. H. & T. Székely, 2005. Evolutionary pathways in shorebird breeding systems: sexual conflict, parental care, and chick development. Evolution 59: 2222–2230.
Townshend, T. J. & R. J. Wootton, 1985. Variation in the mating system of a biparental cichlid fish, Cichlasoma panamense. Behaviour 95: 181–197.
Trapani, J., 2003a. Morphological variability in the Cuatro Ciénegas cichlid, Cichlasoma minckleyi. Journal of Fish Biology 62: 276–298.
Trapani, J., 2003b. Geometric morphometric analysis of body-form variability in Cichlasoma minckleyi, the Cuatro Ciénegas cichlid. Environmental Biology of Fishes 68: 357–369.
Trapani, J., 2004. A morphometric analysis of polymorphism in the pharyngeal dentition of Cichlasoma minckleyi (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Archives of Oral Biology 49: 825–835.
Turner, G. F. & M. T. Burrows, 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London (Series B) 260: 287–292.
van den Berghe, E. P. & K. R. McKaye, 2001. Reproductive success of maternal and biparental care in a Nicaraguan cichlid fish, Parachromis dovii. In Coleman, R. M. (ed.), Cichlid Research: State of the Art. Journal of Aquariculture and Aquatic Sciences 9: 49–65.
van Dijk, R. E., A. Pogány, J. Komdeur, P. Lloyd & T. Székely, 2010. Sexual conflict predicts morphology and behavior in two species of penduline tits. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 107.
van Doorn, G. S., P. Edelaar & F. J. Weissing, 2009. On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection. Science 326: 1704–1707.
Wagner, C. E., L. J. Harmon & O. Seehausen, 2012. Ecological opportunity and sexual selection together predict adaptive radiation. Nature 487: 366–369.
Westneat, D. F. & R. C. Sargent, 1996. Sex and parenting: the effects of sexual conflict and parentage on parental strategies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 87–91.
Wisenden, B. D., 1994. Factors affecting male mate desertion in the biparental cichlid fish (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum) in Costa Rica. Behavioral Ecology 5: 439–447.
Yanagisawa, Y., 1985. Parental strategy of the cichlid fish Perissodus microlepis, with particular reference to intraspecific brood ‘farming out’. Environmental Biology of Fishes 12: 211–249.
We thank Laura Alberici da Barbiano, Chelsea Blake, Caitlin Gabor, Jorge L. Hurtado-Gonzales, Michael Jennions, Hanna Kokko, Diane Neudorf, and Amanda Winn for their helpful comments on the manuscript. The Texas Natural History Collections at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology provided access to specimens. This work was supported by an Engineering Plus National Science Foundation—ADVANCE Opportunity Grant (R.G.O.); by the Teresa Lozano Long Institute of Latin American Studies at the University of Texas at Austin from funds granted to the Institute by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation (D.A.H.); by the National Science Foundation Grants DEB-0916695 and DEB-1354149 (P.C.); and by the National Science Foundation Grant IOS-0843712, an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Fellowship, the Dwight W. and Blanche Faye Reeder Centennial Fellowship in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, and an Institute for Cellular & Molecular Biology Fellowship (H.A.H.).
Guest editors: S. Koblmüller, R. C. Albertson, M. J. Genner, K. M. Sefc & T. Takahashi / Advances in Cichlid Research: Behavior, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Oldfield, R.G., Mandrekar, K., Nieves, M.X. et al. Parental care in the Cuatro Ciénegas cichlid, Herichthys minckleyi (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Hydrobiologia 748, 233–257 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2081-4
- Cuatro Ciénegas
- Mating systems
- Sexual selection