Aquatic invertebrate communities in tank bromeliads: how well do classic ecological patterns apply?
- 553 Downloads
Tank bromeliads (Bromeliaceae) often occur in high densities in the Neotropics and represent a key freshwater habitat in montane forests, housing quite complex invertebrate communities. We tested the extent to which there are species richness–altitude, richness–environment, richness–size, richness–habitat complexity and richness–isolation relationships for the aquatic invertebrate communities from 157 bromeliads in Cusuco National Park, Honduras. We found that invertebrate species richness and abundance correlated most strongly, and positively, with habitat size, which accounted for about a third of the variance in both. Apart from bromeliad size (equivalent of the species–area relationship), we found remarkably little evidence of classic biogeographic and ecological relationships with species richness in this system. Community composition correlated with altitude, bromeliad size and position, though less than 20% of the variation was accounted for by the tested variables. The turnover component of dissimilarity between the communities correlated with altitude, while the nestedness-resultant component was related to bromeliad size. The unexplained variance could reflect a large stochastic component in the system, associated with the ephemerality of the habitat patches (both the plants themselves and the fluctuations in their water content) and stochasticity due to the dispersal dynamics in the system. We conclude that there is a small contribution of classic biogeographic factors to the diversity and community composition of aquatic invertebrates communities in bromeliads. This may be due to the highly dynamic nature of this system, with small patch sizes and high emigration rates. The patterns may mostly be driven by factors affecting colonisation success.
KeywordsAlpha diversity Altitudinal gradient Beta diversity Species diversity Species–elevation relationship Species–isolation relationship
- Benzing, D. H., 2000. Bromeliaceae: Profile of an Adaptive Radiation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Dézerald O., T. Stanislas, C. Leroy, J. Carrias, B. Corbara, A. Dejean & R. Céréghino, 2014. Environmental determinants of macroinvertebrate diversity in small water bodies: insights from tank-bromeliads. Hydrobiologia 723: 77–86. Google Scholar
- Field, R. & P. R. Long, 2007. Cusuco National Park, Honduras: Ecology of a Meso-American Cloud Forest. Operation Wallacea Ltd, Old Bolingbroke.Google Scholar
- Field, R., B. A. Hawkins, H. V. Cornell, D. J. Currie, J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, J.-F. Guégan, D. M. Kaufman, J. T. Kerr, G. G. Mittelbach, T. Oberdorff, E. M. O’Brien & J. R. G. Turner, 2009. Spatial species-richness gradients across scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Biogeography 36: 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fish, D., 1976. Structure and composition of the aquatic invertebrate community inhabiting epiphytic bromeliads in South Florida and the discovery of an insectivorous bromeliad. PhD dissertation. University of Florida.Google Scholar
- Frank, J. H. & L. P. Lounibos, 1983. Phytotelmata: Terrestrial Plants as Hosts for Aquatic Insect Communities. Plexus, Medford, NJ.Google Scholar
- Frank, J. H., S. Sreenivasan, P. J. Benshoff, M. A. Deyrup, G. B. Edwards, S. E. Halbert, A. B. Hamon, M. D. Lowman, E. L. Mockford, R. H. Scheffrahn, G. J. Steck, M. C. Thomas, T. J. Walker & W. C. Welbourne, 2004. Invertebrate animals extracted from native Tillandsia (Bromeliales: Bromeliaceae) in Sarasota County, Florida. Florida Entomologist 87: 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilbert, B., D. S. Srivastava & K. R. Kirby, 2008. Niche partitioning at multiple scales facilitates coexistence among mosquito larvae. Oikos 117: 944–950.Google Scholar
- Grytnes, J. A. & C. M. McCain, 2007. Elevational patterns in species richness. In Levin, S. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Elsevier, Inc., Oxford.Google Scholar
- Lopez, L. C. S., D. A. Goncalves, A. Mantovani & R. I. Rios, 2002. Bromeliad ostracods pass through amphibian (Scinaxax perpusillus) and mammalian guts alive. Hydrobiologia 485: 209–211.Google Scholar
- MacArthur, R. H. & E. O. Wilson, 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Mendes, H. F., T. Andersen & M. Jocque, 2011. A new species of Polypedilum Kieffer from bromeliads in Parque Nacional Cusuco, Honduras (Chironomidae: Chironominae). Zootaxa 3062: 46–54.Google Scholar
- Ngai, J. T., K. R. Kirby, B. Gilbert, B. M. Starzomski, A. D. J. Pelletier & J. C. R. Conner, 2008. The impact of land-use change on larval insect communities: testing the role of habitat elements in conservation. Ecoscience 15: 160–168.Google Scholar
- Picado, C., 1913. Les Bromeliacees Epiphytes. Bulletin Scientifique Tome 47: 216–360.Google Scholar
- R Studio, 2012. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (Version 0.96.122) [Computer Software]. RStudio, Boston.Google Scholar
- Rohde, K., 1992. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity—the search for the primary cause. Oikos 65: 514–527.Google Scholar
- StatSoft, Inc., 2012. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 11. www.statsoft.com.
- ter Braak, C. J. F. & P. Šmilauer, 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca NY.Google Scholar